nvc
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Nonviolent Communication (Marshall Rosenberg) - Transform conflict into connection through observation, feelings, needs, and requests
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 44
Use verbs, not adjectives ("You raised your voice" not "You were aggressive")
- Distinctive: line 115
Ask: "What am I observing?" (just facts)
- Distinctive: line 116
Ask: "What am I feeling?" (emotion, not thought)
- Distinctive: line 117
Ask: "What need of mine is alive right now?"
- Distinctive: line 118
Ask: "What request could I make — of myself or another?"
- Distinctive: line 122
Put your agenda aside entirely
- Distinctive: line 126
Do NOT: advise, console, one-up, educate, or correct
- Distinctive: line 136
When you've done all 4 steps and the other person shows no response:
- Distinctive: line 140
The 10-Second Rule: After stating your request, wait at least 10 seconds of silence before speaking again
- Distinctive: line 149
When processing a situation through NVC:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Nonviolent Communication (NVC) Skill
"Every criticism, judgment, diagnosis, and expression of anger is the tragic expression of an unmet need." — Marshall Rosenberg
Overview
NVC (비폭력 대화) is a communication framework developed by Marshall Rosenberg that replaces habitual reactive patterns with conscious, empathic responses. It transforms how we express ourselves and hear others by focusing on four components: observations, feelings, needs, and requests.
Sub-commands
| Command | Description |
/nvc | Full 4-step NVC process on a given situation |
/nvc:observe | Practice separating observation from evaluation |
/nvc:empathy | Empathic listening — guess the other person's feelings and needs |
/nvc:request | Craft a clear, positive, actionable request |
Process
Step 1: Observation (관찰) — Without Evaluation
State what you concretely see or hear without mixing in judgment, interpretation, or evaluation.
The core distinction:
- Observation (관찰): "You arrived at 9:20 for our 9:00 meeting"
- Evaluation (평가): "You're always late" / "You don't respect my time"
Rules:
- Be specific about time and context ("When I saw X..." / "When you said Y...")
- Use verbs, not adjectives ("You raised your voice" not "You were aggressive")
- Quantify when possible ("three times this week" not "always")
- Refer to observable behavior, not assumed intent
Test: Would a video camera record this? If not, it's evaluation, not observation.
Step 2: Feeling (느낌) — Not Thinking
Identify the emotion stimulated by what you observed. Distinguish genuine feelings from thoughts disguised as feelings.
Real feelings (진짜 느낌):
- Sad (슬픔), scared (두려움), angry (분노), hurt (상처), confused (혼란), tired (피곤), hopeful (희망), grateful (감사)
Pseudo-feelings / Faux feelings (가짜 느낌) — actually judgments:
- "I feel abandoned" (implies someone abandoned you)
- "I feel manipulated" (implies someone is manipulating you)
- "I feel unappreciated" (implies others should appreciate you)
- "I feel that you don't care" (this is a thought, not a feeling)
Test: Can you say "I feel ___" and it's purely an internal state? If it requires another person to act on you, it's a judgment.
Step 3: Need (욕구) — Universal Human Needs
Connect the feeling to the underlying need — the universal human value that is or isn't being met.
Key principle: Feelings are caused by needs, not by other people's actions. Others are the stimulus, not the cause.
Categories of needs:
- Autonomy (자율성): choice, freedom, independence
- Connection (연결): belonging, intimacy, love, respect, trust
- Physical (신체적): food, rest, safety, shelter
- Meaning (의미): contribution, purpose, growth, learning
- Play (놀이): fun, humor, recreation
- Integrity (진실성): authenticity, honesty, self-worth
- Peace (평화): harmony, order, beauty
Step 4: Request (부탁) — Clear, Positive, Doable
Make a specific, positive, present-tense request — not a demand.
Request vs Demand (부탁 vs 강요):
- Request: The other person can say no without punishment
- Demand: Saying no leads to blame, guilt, or consequences
Formulation rules:
- Positive language: Say what you DO want, not what you DON'T want
- Not: "Stop yelling" → "Would you be willing to speak more softly?"
- Specific action: Observable behavior, not vague attitude change
- Not: "Be more considerate" → "Would you text me if you'll be more than 15 minutes late?"
- Present tense: Askable right now
- Check understanding: "Would you tell me what you heard me say?"
Jackal vs Giraffe Language (자칼 vs 기린 언어)
| Jackal (자칼) — Life-alienating | Giraffe (기린) — Life-enriching |
| Moralistic judgments ("You're wrong") | Observations + feelings + needs |
| Comparisons ("You're not as good as...") | Empathic connection |
| Denial of responsibility ("I had to") | Ownership ("I chose to because I value...") |
| Demands ("You must") | Requests ("Would you be willing to...") |
| Deserve-thinking ("They deserve punishment") | Restorative approach ("What needs are unmet?") |
Three Modes of NVC
1. Self-Empathy (자기 공감)
Turn inward. When triggered:
- Pause. Notice the physical sensation.
- Ask: "What am I observing?" (just facts)
- Ask: "What am I feeling?" (emotion, not thought)
- Ask: "What need of mine is alive right now?"
- Ask: "What request could I make — of myself or another?"
2. Empathy for Others (타인에 대한 공감)
Listen to understand, not to fix or reply:
- Put your agenda aside entirely
- Guess their feelings: "Are you feeling ___?"
- Guess their needs: "Because you need ___?"
- Stay with them until they exhale / relax / say "yes, exactly"
- Do NOT: advise, console, one-up, educate, or correct
3. Honest Expression (솔직한 표현)
Speak your truth without blame:
- "When I [observation], I feel [feeling] because I need [need]. Would you be willing to [request]?"
When NVC Doesn't Work: Emergency Empathy
When you've done all 4 steps and the other person shows no response:
- Stop talking. More NVC words won't help.
- Switch to Self-Empathy: Internally acknowledge YOUR feelings and needs right now
- Silent Empathy: Just be present. No words. Hold space.
- The 10-Second Rule: After stating your request, wait at least 10 seconds of silence before speaking again
- Strategic Retreat: "I can see this is hard. I'm going to give us both some space. Can we come back to this tomorrow?"
Common trap: Repeating NVC steps louder/slower when they don't work the first time. NVC is not a magic spell — if the emotional temperature is too high, switch to Active Listening only.
Output Format
When processing a situation through NVC:
## NVC Analysis
**Situation:** [brief description]
### 1. Observation (관찰)
[Concrete, specific, camera-testable facts]
### 2. Feeling (느낌)
[Genuine emotions — not thoughts or judgments]
### 3. Need (욕구)
[Universal human need connected to the feeling]
### 4. Request (부탁)
[Specific, positive, doable, present-tense request]
### Full NVC Statement
"When [observation], I feel [feeling] because I need [need]. Would you be willing to [request]?"
### Empathy Guess (for the other person)
"Are you feeling [feeling] because you need [need]?"Anti-patterns
- Mixing observation with evaluation — "You're always late" instead of "You arrived at 9:20 for three of our last four meetings"
- Using faux feelings — "I feel rejected/abandoned/betrayed" (these are interpretations of others' actions, not feelings)
- Diagnosing others' feelings — "You feel angry because YOU..." (project your story onto them)
- Vague requests — "I want you to be more respectful" (not actionable or observable)
- Mechanical NVC — Robotically reciting the formula without genuine empathic presence
- NVC as manipulation — Using the structure to get what you want rather than to genuinely connect
- Skipping self-empathy — Trying to empathize with others while internally flooded
- Demanding agreement — "Do you understand?" instead of "Would you tell me what you heard?"
- "But" — "I hear you, BUT..." negates everything before it. Use "AND" or pause.
- Responsibility deflection — "You MAKE me feel angry" (no one makes you feel; your needs do)
References
nvc/references/feelings-needs-list.md— Comprehensive vocabulary of feelings and needs- Marshall Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life (3rd ed., 2015)
- Marshall Rosenberg, Speak Peace in a World of Conflict (2005)
- Center for Nonviolent Communication: https://www.cnvc.org
- NVC Academy: https://nvcacademy.com
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- yijingjia/skills★ 70same name
- xiongxianfei/skillsmith★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- active-listeningSkill
- crucial-conversationsSkill
- descSkill
- Difficult ConversationsSkill
- getting-to-yesSkill
- howtotalkSkill
- influenceSkill
- Motivational InterviewingSkill
- never-splitSkill
- Radical CandorSkill
- scarfSkill
- Socratic MethodSkill
- Storytelling FrameworksSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

