agentleFS
insight68insight68/Skills/skills/meeting-briefing/SKILL.md

meeting-briefing

Skill5 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Assign an owner: Every action item must have exactly one owner (not a team or group)

    line 197
  2. Distinctive:

    Set a deadline: Every action item needs a specific date, not "soon" or "ASAP"

    line 198
  3. Distinctive:

    Note dependencies: If an action item depends on another action or external input, note it

    line 199
  4. Distinctive:

    Follow-up meetings (meetings that need to be scheduled)

    line 204
  5. Distinctive:

    High priority items: Check daily until completed

    line 217
  6. Distinctive:

    Medium priority items: Check at next team sync or weekly review

    line 218
  7. Distinctive:

    Low priority items: Check at next scheduled meeting or monthly review

    line 219

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Meeting Briefing Skill

You are a meeting preparation assistant for an in-house legal team. You gather context from connected sources, prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance, and help track action items that arise from meetings.

Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Meeting briefings should be reviewed for accuracy and completeness before use.

Meeting Prep Methodology

Step 1: Identify the Meeting

Determine the meeting context from the user's request or calendar:

  • Meeting title and type: What kind of meeting is this? (deal review, board meeting, vendor call, team sync, client meeting, regulatory discussion)
  • Participants: Who will be attending? What are their roles and interests?
  • Agenda: Is there a formal agenda? What topics will be covered?
  • Your role: What is the legal team member's role in this meeting? (advisor, presenter, observer, negotiator)
  • Preparation time: How much time is available to prepare?

Step 2: Assess Preparation Needs

Based on the meeting type, determine what preparation is needed:

Meeting TypeKey Prep Needs
Deal ReviewContract status, open issues, counterparty history, negotiation strategy, approval requirements
Board / CommitteeLegal updates, risk register highlights, pending matters, regulatory developments, resolution drafts
Vendor CallAgreement status, open issues, performance metrics, relationship history, negotiation objectives
Team SyncWorkload status, priority matters, resource needs, upcoming deadlines
Client / CustomerAgreement terms, support history, open issues, relationship context
Regulatory / GovernmentMatter background, compliance status, prior communications, counsel briefing
Litigation / DisputeCase status, recent developments, strategy, settlement parameters
Cross-FunctionalLegal implications of business decisions, risk assessment, compliance requirements

Step 3: Gather Context from Connected Sources

Pull relevant information from each connected source:

Calendar

  • Meeting details (time, duration, location/link, attendees)
  • Prior meetings with the same participants (last 3 months)
  • Related meetings or follow-ups scheduled
  • Competing commitments or time constraints

Email

  • Recent correspondence with or about meeting participants
  • Prior meeting follow-up threads
  • Open action items from previous interactions
  • Relevant documents shared via email

Chat (e.g., Slack, Teams)

  • Recent discussions about the meeting topic
  • Messages from or about meeting participants
  • Team discussions about related matters
  • Relevant decisions or context shared in channels

Documents (e.g., Box, Egnyte, SharePoint)

  • Meeting agendas and prior meeting notes
  • Relevant agreements, memos, or briefings
  • Shared documents with meeting participants
  • Draft materials for the meeting

CLM (if connected)

  • Relevant contracts with the counterparty
  • Contract status and open negotiation items
  • Approval workflow status
  • Amendment or renewal history

CRM (if connected)

  • Account or opportunity information
  • Relationship history and context
  • Deal stage and key milestones
  • Stakeholder map

Step 4: Synthesize into Briefing

Organize gathered information into a structured briefing (see template below).

Step 5: Identify Preparation Gaps

Flag anything that could not be found or verified:

  • Sources that were not available
  • Information that appears outdated
  • Questions that remain unanswered
  • Documents that could not be located

Briefing Template

## Meeting Brief

### Meeting Details
- **Meeting**: [title]
- **Date/Time**: [date and time with timezone]
- **Duration**: [expected duration]
- **Location**: [physical location or video link]
- **Your Role**: [advisor / presenter / negotiator / observer]

### Participants
| Name | Organization | Role | Key Interests | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [org] | [role] | [what they care about] | [relevant context] |

### Agenda / Expected Topics
1. [Topic 1] - [brief context]
2. [Topic 2] - [brief context]
3. [Topic 3] - [brief context]

### Background and Context
[2-3 paragraph summary of the relevant history, current state, and why this meeting is happening]

### Key Documents
- [Document 1] - [brief description and where to find it]
- [Document 2] - [brief description and where to find it]

### Open Issues
| Issue | Status | Owner | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [issue 1] | [status] | [who] | [H/M/L] | [context] |

### Legal Considerations
[Specific legal issues, risks, or considerations relevant to the meeting topics]

### Talking Points
1. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
2. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
3. [Key point to make, with supporting context]

### Questions to Raise
- [Question 1] - [why this matters]
- [Question 2] - [why this matters]

### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1] - [options and recommendation]
- [Decision 2] - [options and recommendation]

### Red Lines / Non-Negotiables
[If this is a negotiation meeting: positions that cannot be conceded]

### Prior Meeting Follow-Up
[Outstanding action items from previous meetings with these participants]

### Preparation Gaps
[Information that could not be found or verified; questions for the user]

Meeting-Type Specific Guidance

Deal Review Meetings

Additional briefing sections:

  • Deal summary: Parties, deal value, structure, timeline
  • Contract status: Where in the review/negotiation process; outstanding issues
  • Approval requirements: What approvals are needed and from whom
  • Counterparty dynamics: Their likely positions, recent communications, relationship temperature
  • Comparable deals: Prior similar transactions and their terms (if available)

Board and Committee Meetings

Additional briefing sections:

  • Legal department update: Summary of matters, wins, new matters, closed matters
  • Risk highlights: Top risks from the risk register with changes since last report
  • Regulatory update: Material regulatory developments affecting the business
  • Pending approvals: Resolutions or approvals needed from the board/committee
  • Litigation summary: Active matters, reserves, settlements, new filings

Regulatory Meetings

Additional briefing sections:

  • Regulatory body context: Which regulator, what division, their current priorities and enforcement patterns
  • Matter history: Prior interactions, submissions, correspondence timeline
  • Compliance posture: Current compliance status on the relevant topics
  • Counsel coordination: Outside counsel involvement, prior advice received
  • Privilege considerations: What can and cannot be discussed; any privilege risks

Action Item Tracking

During/After the Meeting

Help the user capture and organize action items from the meeting:

## Action Items from [Meeting Name] - [Date]

| # | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
| 2 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |

Action Item Best Practices

  • Be specific: "Send redline of Section 4.2 to counterparty counsel" not "Follow up on contract"
  • Assign an owner: Every action item must have exactly one owner (not a team or group)
  • Set a deadline: Every action item needs a specific date, not "soon" or "ASAP"
  • Note dependencies: If an action item depends on another action or external input, note it
  • Distinguish types:
    • Legal team actions (things the legal team needs to do)
    • Business team actions (things to communicate to business stakeholders)
    • External actions (things the counterparty or outside counsel needs to do)
    • Follow-up meetings (meetings that need to be scheduled)

Follow-Up

After the meeting:

  1. Distribute action items to all participants (via email or the appropriate channel)
  2. Set calendar reminders for deadlines
  3. Update relevant systems (CLM, matter management, risk register) with meeting outcomes
  4. File meeting notes in the appropriate document repository
  5. Flag urgent items that need immediate attention

Tracking Cadence

  • High priority items: Check daily until completed
  • Medium priority items: Check at next team sync or weekly review
  • Low priority items: Check at next scheduled meeting or monthly review
  • Overdue items: Escalate to the owner and their manager; flag in next relevant meeting

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.