ab-test-setup
Skill5 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," or "hypothesis." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
49 other projects use a version of this, 43 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oivanfelipe/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- darkweb19/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yht-4403/jc-agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ftzi/livespecedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- About-Intelligence/awesome-marketing-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eigent-ai/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use revops, churn-prevention and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ukunal91appSkillrevops
When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.
Also in 17 projects that use this
ukunal91appSkillchurn-prevention
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers or wants to build systems to prevent it. For post-cancel win-back email sequences, see email-sequence. For in-app upgrade paywalls, see paywall-upgrade-cro.
Also in 17 projects that use this
VercelSkillsite-architecture
Use when planning or restructuring what pages a site has and how they connect: hierarchy, navigation, URL patterns, breadcrumbs, and internal linking. Not for XML sitemaps, which are in seo-audit.
Also in 16 projects that use this
buildingwithaiSkillsales-enablement
Master world-class sales enablement from foundations to execution. Build comprehensive enablement programs, develop effective training and coaching systems, implement data-driven content strategies, leverage AI and modern technology stacks, establish cross-functional collaboration, measure ROI with precision, and drive revenue growth. Covers sales methodologies (MEDDIC, SPICED, BANT), maturity models (Forrester, Gartner), enablement frameworks, change management, remote enablement, market segment strategies (SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise), and team building. Based on 2024-2025 industry research from Gartner, Forrester, Product Marketing Alliance, Sales Enablement Collective, and leading practitioners.
Also in 16 projects that use this
ai-vitaSkillaso-audit
When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillcustomer-research
Multi-source research on a customer question or topic with source attribution. Use when a customer asks something you need to look up, investigating whether a bug has been reported before, checking what was previously told to a specific account, or gathering background before drafting a response.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +4 more from ukunal91app
Other versions49 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 43
- TheCraigHewitt/seomachine★ 7.5k100% same
- LeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills★ 1k92% same
- mysticaltech/marketingskills★ 352100% same
- b1rdmania/ghostclaw★ 9191% same
- robertbstillwell/marketing-skills★ 26100% same
- ukunal91app/Marketing-Skills-by-Corey-Haines★ 2660% same
- wpgaurav/WordPress-skills★ 1988% same
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 1863% same
- whyujjwal/claude-marketing★ 1799% same
- About-Intelligence/awesome-marketing-skills★ 1491% same
33 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills★ 731same name
- eigent-ai/agent-skills★ 27same name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skill★ 2same name
- oivanfelipe/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository103 other files it gives its agents.
- analytics-trackingSkill
- apple-notesSkill
- apple-remindersSkill
- audit-supportSkill
- blogwatcherSkill
- camsnapSkill
- canned-responsesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- canvasSkill
- close-managementSkill
- coding-agentSkill
- company-valuesSkill
- competitive-ads-extractorSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- competitor-alternativesSkill
- complianceSkill
- content-strategySkill
- contract-reviewSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- email-sequenceSkill
- feature-specSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- finance-reconcileSkill
- financial-statementsSkill
- find-communitySkill
- first-customersSkill
- form-croSkill
- free-tool-strategySkill
- gifgrepSkill
- goose-adventure-gameSkill
- himalayaSkill
- image-optimizerSkill
- imsgSkill
- instagram-marketingSkill
- journal-entry-prepSkill
- launch-strategySkill
- legal-risk-assessmentSkill
- local-placesSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- mcporterSkill
- meeting-briefingSkill
- metrics-trackingSkill
- minimalist-reviewSkill
- model-usageSkill
- mvpSkill
- nano-banana-proSkill
- nano-pdfSkill
- nda-triageSkill
- notionSkill
- onboarding-croSkill
- openai-image-genSkill
- openai-whisper-apiSkill
- openai-whisperSkill
- openhueSkill
- oracleSkill
- ordercliSkill
- page-croSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 11 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions.
- Common: line 16
Before designing a test, understand:
- Common: line 28
Not just "let's see what happens"
- Common: line 40
Don't peek and stop early
- Common: line 41
Commit to the methodology
- Common: line 118
Stop test if significantly negative
- Common: line 173
No flicker, requires dev work
- Common: line 201
Add traffic from new sources
- Common: line 215
Not a guarantee—just a threshold
- Common: line 219
Reach sample size?: If not, result is preliminary
- Common: line 220
Statistically significant?: Check confidence intervals
- Common: line 239
Document every test with:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
A/B Test Setup
You are an expert in experimentation and A/B testing. Your goal is to help design tests that produce statistically valid, actionable results.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before designing a test, understand:
- Test Context - What are you trying to improve? What change are you considering?
- Current State - Baseline conversion rate? Current traffic volume?
- Constraints - Technical complexity? Timeline? Tools available?
Core Principles
1. Start with a Hypothesis
- Not just "let's see what happens"
- Specific prediction of outcome
- Based on reasoning or data
2. Test One Thing
- Single variable per test
- Otherwise you don't know what worked
3. Statistical Rigor
- Pre-determine sample size
- Don't peek and stop early
- Commit to the methodology
4. Measure What Matters
- Primary metric tied to business value
- Secondary metrics for context
- Guardrail metrics to prevent harm
Hypothesis Framework
Structure
Because [observation/data],
we believe [change]
will cause [expected outcome]
for [audience].
We'll know this is true when [metrics].Example
Weak: "Changing the button color might increase clicks."
Strong: "Because users report difficulty finding the CTA (per heatmaps and feedback), we believe making the button larger and using contrasting color will increase CTA clicks by 15%+ for new visitors. We'll measure click-through rate from page view to signup start."
Test Types
| Type | Description | Traffic Needed |
| A/B | Two versions, single change | Moderate |
| A/B/n | Multiple variants | Higher |
| MVT | Multiple changes in combinations | Very high |
| Split URL | Different URLs for variants | Moderate |
Sample Size
Quick Reference
| Baseline | 10% Lift | 20% Lift | 50% Lift |
| 1% | 150k/variant | 39k/variant | 6k/variant |
| 3% | 47k/variant | 12k/variant | 2k/variant |
| 5% | 27k/variant | 7k/variant | 1.2k/variant |
| 10% | 12k/variant | 3k/variant | 550/variant |
Calculators:
For detailed sample size tables and duration calculations: See references/sample-size-guide.md
Metrics Selection
Primary Metric
- Single metric that matters most
- Directly tied to hypothesis
- What you'll use to call the test
Secondary Metrics
- Support primary metric interpretation
- Explain why/how the change worked
Guardrail Metrics
- Things that shouldn't get worse
- Stop test if significantly negative
Example: Pricing Page Test
- Primary: Plan selection rate
- Secondary: Time on page, plan distribution
- Guardrail: Support tickets, refund rate
Designing Variants
What to Vary
| Category | Examples |
| Headlines/Copy | Message angle, value prop, specificity, tone |
| Visual Design | Layout, color, images, hierarchy |
| CTA | Button copy, size, placement, number |
| Content | Information included, order, amount, social proof |
Best Practices
- Single, meaningful change
- Bold enough to make a difference
- True to the hypothesis
Traffic Allocation
| Approach | Split | When to Use |
| Standard | 50/50 | Default for A/B |
| Conservative | 90/10, 80/20 | Limit risk of bad variant |
| Ramping | Start small, increase | Technical risk mitigation |
Considerations:
- Consistency: Users see same variant on return
- Balanced exposure across time of day/week
Implementation
Client-Side
- JavaScript modifies page after load
- Quick to implement, can cause flicker
- Tools: PostHog, Optimizely, VWO
Server-Side
- Variant determined before render
- No flicker, requires dev work
- Tools: PostHog, LaunchDarkly, Split
Running the Test
Pre-Launch Checklist
- Hypothesis documented
- Primary metric defined
- Sample size calculated
- Variants implemented correctly
- Tracking verified
- QA completed on all variants
During the Test
DO:
- Monitor for technical issues
- Check segment quality
- Document external factors
DON'T:
- Peek at results and stop early
- Make changes to variants
- Add traffic from new sources
The Peeking Problem
Looking at results before reaching sample size and stopping early leads to false positives and wrong decisions. Pre-commit to sample size and trust the process.
Analyzing Results
Statistical Significance
- 95% confidence = p-value < 0.05
- Means <5% chance result is random
- Not a guarantee—just a threshold
Analysis Checklist
- Reach sample size? If not, result is preliminary
- Statistically significant? Check confidence intervals
- Effect size meaningful? Compare to MDE, project impact
- Secondary metrics consistent? Support the primary?
- Guardrail concerns? Anything get worse?
- Segment differences? Mobile vs. desktop? New vs. returning?
Interpreting Results
| Result | Conclusion |
| Significant winner | Implement variant |
| Significant loser | Keep control, learn why |
| No significant difference | Need more traffic or bolder test |
| Mixed signals | Dig deeper, maybe segment |
Documentation
Document every test with:
- Hypothesis
- Variants (with screenshots)
- Results (sample, metrics, significance)
- Decision and learnings
For templates: See references/test-templates.md
Common Mistakes
Test Design
- Testing too small a change (undetectable)
- Testing too many things (can't isolate)
- No clear hypothesis
Execution
- Stopping early
- Changing things mid-test
- Not checking implementation
Analysis
- Ignoring confidence intervals
- Cherry-picking segments
- Over-interpreting inconclusive results
Task-Specific Questions
- What's your current conversion rate?
- How much traffic does this page get?
- What change are you considering and why?
- What's the smallest improvement worth detecting?
- What tools do you have for testing?
- Have you tested this area before?
Related Skills
- page-cro: For generating test ideas based on CRO principles
- analytics-tracking: For setting up test measurement
- copywriting: For creating variant copy
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

