new-post
Skill14 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run the complete evidence-to-delivery workflow for a static or animated LinkedIn infographic, including verified identity sourcing, creative concepting, typography direction, story architecture, production, critique, and independent verification.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- passion4it-gmbh/passionfruit-sitetheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- passion4it-gmbh/passionfruit-site★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- linkedin-animated-infographicsSkill
- linkedin-animated-infographics-conventionsSkill
- arabicSkill
- artboardSkill
- captionSkill
- info-storiesSkill
- mascotsSkill
- masteroneSkill
- motionSkill
- postSkill
- qa-postSkill
- render-gifSkill
- renderSkill
- share-demoSkill
- svg-mascot-animatorSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Run the canonical parent workflow for a complete LinkedIn infographic.
- Very specific: line 16
Read helper/GUIDE.md before execution.
- Distinctive: line 20
Use this workflow when the user wants a complete new infographic or a substantial redesign that should proceed from source/evidence through …
- Distinctive: line 22
Use focused skills instead when the request is only a render, only QA, only mascot animation, only a design study, or only publishing an …
- Very specific: line 65
If Arabic/RTL is active, load the arabic skill before copy or layout work.
- Very specific: line 67
If a named or official mascot is requested, record build/mascot-request.json.
- Very specific: line 123
Use center-first for the primary visual anchor and major story zones.
- Very specific: line 167
Ask one concise opt-in question: Share this demo with the community?
- Very specific: line 169
If the user explicitly accepts, transfer control to the focused parent workflow share-demo.
- Distinctive: line 171
If the user declines or gives no answer, stop with no GitHub write.
- Very specific: line 173
If share-demo later returns a HOLD, preserve the already delivered artifact and report only the publication blocker.
- Distinctive: line 177
Stop and return a precise HOLD when any blocking production requirement is unresolved, including:
- Distinctive: line 194
Do not fill missing inputs with plausible content.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/linkedin-animated-infographics:new-post
Topic: $ARGUMENTS
Purpose
Run the canonical parent workflow for a complete LinkedIn infographic. The workflow owns routing, user approvals, HOLD resolution, targeted repair loops, and final delivery. Workers return bounded artifacts here and never coordinate peer workers directly.
Read helper/GUIDE.md before execution. Treat helper/router.json, helper/capabilities.json, helper/quality-gates.json, helper/artifacts.json, research/capability-notes/gates.json, and architecture/plugin-graph.json as machine-readable contracts.
Use when
Use this workflow when the user wants a complete new infographic or a substantial redesign that should proceed from source/evidence through verified assets, concept, type, copy, artboard, optional motion, QA, and delivery.
Use focused skills instead when the request is only a render, only QA, only mascot animation, only a design study, or only publishing an already verified demo.
Inputs
- topic, source material, URL, files, or user-provided facts
- intended audience and one primary takeaway when they cannot be inferred safely
- desired CTA when applicable
- language and static/animated output preference
- optional visual references
- optional brand/UI assets
- optional exact official identity assets or named AI/tool identities that may resolve through Lobe
- explicit typography requirements when present
Outputs
The parent workflow may produce:
build/design-study.jsonbuild/evidence.jsonbuild/asset-plan.jsonbuild/creative-concepts.jsonbuild/story-brief.jsonbuild/palette-check.jsonbuild/type-spec.jsonbuild/artboard-copy.jsonbuild/layout-spec.jsonbuild/caption.mdbuild/first-comment.mdbuild/post.htmlbuild/still.pngbuild/motion-direction.jsonfor animated outputbuild/mascot/motion-contract.jsonwhen a mascot is activebuild/render-report.jsonbuild/critic-report.jsonbuild/verification-report.json- final static/GIF artifact plus resolved story and validation summary
Procedure
0. Route and conditional gates
Resolve the request through the helper. Apply local quality gates and research gates before production.
If Arabic/RTL is active, load the arabic skill before copy or layout work.
If a named or official mascot is requested, record build/mascot-request.json. The identity is not allowed to bypass the verified identity path. Exact user/task SVG assets keep priority; supported AI/tool identities may resolve from Lobe; unresolved named identities HOLD.
1. Reference diagnosis
Consume reference_diagnosis from the helper before evidence inventory:
SKIP: no reference was supplied; do not invokedesign-study.HOLD: explicit reference intent has no usablereference_evidence; stop beforeevidence-checkerwithHOLD: reference evidence unavailable.READY: invokedesign-studyas the first worker and savebuild/design-study.json. Activatereference-dnaand study reusable structure, hierarchy, rhythm, density, type roles, and motion grammar without cloning distinctive work.
Downstream workers receive only the selected mechanism IDs and the focused stage context from build/design-study.json, never the full reference library or raw reference media.
2. Evidence inventory
Delegate to evidence-checker. Save build/evidence.json with protected claims, metrics, product states, named identities, logos, proof, and unsupported slots. Unsupported proof is blocked before creative/copy/layout production.
3. Verified identity asset plan
Delegate to asset-curator. Save build/asset-plan.json.
Apply verified-identity-assets and skills/info-stories/references/asset-source-policy.md. Exact user-supplied official assets win. For supported named AI/tool identities, the worker reads https://lobehub.com/icons/skill.md and follows the current Lobe instructions. Final production assets must be local or embedded. If a named identity cannot be verified, stop with HOLD: verified identity asset required instead of generating a lookalike.
4. Creative concept directions
Delegate to creative-director with the evidence record, asset plan, optional design study, audience, language, output mode, and approved constraints. Save build/creative-concepts.json.
Require at least three meaningfully different directions. Every direction contains a visual hook, copy hook, aha mechanic, story relationship, dominant visual anchor, structure/archetype, containment strategy, negative-space strategy, motion job, evidence dependencies, risk notes, and why it earns attention.
Apply hooked-design-copy, creative-payoff, and clean-creative-structure. When the story permits, include an editorial low-containment option. When a real relationship exists, include a diagrammatic or relationship-led option. Repeated cards are valid only when repeated units are the story.
The parent workflow selects or approves one direction before story architecture.
5. Story contract
Delegate to story-architect with the selected concept, evidence, optional design study, one takeaway, CTA, language, and output mode. Save build/story-brief.json with Story House, Visual Style, Story Archetype, Motion Patterns, design dials, clean-structure requirements, and execution bridge.
6. Palette contract
Delegate to palette-curator. Save build/palette-check.json.
The plugin default is creative-attractive-restrained: use an engaging, memorable, harmonious palette without exaggerated saturation, unnecessary neon, or competing accents unless the approved brief explicitly calls for them. Text/state contrast floors remain blocking.
7. Typography contract
Delegate to type-curator. Save build/type-spec.json.
Apply intentional-typography and skills/info-stories/references/typography-direction.md. User-specified typography wins when render-safe, followed by supplied/bundled local assets, then a curated deterministic system direction. Remote @import or another render-time font request is blocking.
8. Artboard copy
Delegate to copy-compressor with evidence, selected concept, type spec, story brief, and target slots. Save build/artboard-copy.json. The hero and attention-bearing story openers must use evidence-safe hooks; literal labels remain literal where clarity wins. Copy must fit the type-spec minimum feed sizes without silent font substitution.
9. Static layout specification
Delegate to layout-composer. Save build/layout-spec.json with zone order, proportions, visual anchor, component counts, structural fingerprint, clean-structure requirements, verified asset placements, exact type roles, alignment mode, and any exception reason.
Use center-first for the primary visual anchor and major story zones. A non-centered alignment requires a recorded comprehension/fidelity reason such as tables, UI mockups, code/terminal surfaces, timelines, Arabic/RTL flow, or reference-DNA fidelity.
10. Caption
Delegate to caption-writer. Save build/caption.md and build/first-comment.md. The opening hook must be specific and evidence-safe. Show the caption and selected story direction for approval before still construction when interactive approval is available.
11. Still construction
Delegate to artboard-builder with the approved story, asset plan, type spec, palette, copy, layout, and caption artifacts. It returns build/post.html and build/still.png after source, typography, and static checks. Show the still as the visual approval gate when interaction is available.
12. Motion direction
For animated output, delegate to motion-director with the approved still, selected concept, story brief, layout spec, and mascot role when applicable. Save build/motion-direction.json. Static output records this stage as skipped.
13. Mascot component when active
After still construction and before motion implementation, delegate the verified identity SVG to mascot-animator. The source may be exact user/task input or a verified Lobe asset already copied locally by asset-curator. Save identity and rig evidence plus build/mascot/motion-contract.json. The verified SVG remains the identity source.
14. Motion implementation
For animated output, delegate to motion-engineer with the approved still, story brief, motion direction, and mascot contract when present. It returns the animated build/post.html. Static output skips this stage.
15. Render mechanics and QA
Delegate to render-qa. Save build/render-report.json. A render HOLD returns control to this parent workflow for a targeted fix and re-run.
16. Adversarial review
Delegate to post-critic with the artifact, caption, evidence, asset plan, type spec, selected concept, layout, mascot identity notes when present, and render report. Save build/critic-report.json.
The critic explicitly evaluates hooked-design-copy, creative-payoff, clean-creative-structure, verified-identity-assets, intentional-typography, restrained-palette, and center-first-composition in addition to applicable research gates.
17. Independent acceptance
Delegate to story-verifier. Save build/verification-report.json. The verifier reads artifacts directly, including identity provenance and typography. FAIL:fixable may trigger a targeted fix and re-check. Maximum two targeted repair attempts; a third unresolved failure escalates.
18. Deliver
Deliver the final artifact, caption, first comment, resolved Info-stories choices, selected creative concept, identity source summary, type direction, render numbers when applicable, active gate summary, and final verification verdict.
19. Share with the community (optional)
Offer community sharing only when the final verification verdict is PASS and delivery is complete.
Ask one concise opt-in question: Share this demo with the community?
If the user explicitly accepts, transfer control to the focused parent workflow share-demo. That workflow owns publication metadata, rights confirmation, public-export preflight, source-prompt consent, packaging, and delegation to community-publisher for fork/branch/commit/push/PR mechanics.
If the user declines or gives no answer, stop with no GitHub write. Do not repeat the offer or infer consent from the fact that the user created the demo.
If share-demo later returns a HOLD, preserve the already delivered artifact and report only the publication blocker. A publication HOLD does not invalidate the completed post.
HOLD conditions
Stop and return a precise HOLD when any blocking production requirement is unresolved, including:
- missing verified identity asset for a named AI/tool/logo/mascot
- Lobe coverage cannot be verified for a required supported identity
- final identity asset is remote-only instead of local/embedded
- typography depends on a remote font request or cannot meet feed-scale legibility
- unsupported factual proof, metric, product state, logo, or claim
- hook or aha concept depends on invented evidence
- selected concept fails
clean-creative-structure - failing contrast or Story House compatibility
- unresolved blocking local quality gate
- unresolved blocking research gate
- render evidence unavailable when required
- third unresolved verification failure after two targeted repair attempts
The optional community-sharing stage does not create a production HOLD when the user declines or gives no answer. If the user opts in, publication-specific HOLD conditions are owned by share-demo.
Do not fill missing inputs with plausible content.
Related components
- helper:
helper/GUIDE.md - router:
helper/router.json - local gates:
helper/quality-gates.json - artifacts:
helper/artifacts.json - executable graph:
architecture/plugin-graph.json - identity source policy:
skills/info-stories/references/asset-source-policy.md - typography policy:
skills/info-stories/references/typography-direction.md - creative copy reference:
skills/info-stories/references/hook-driven-design-copy.md - design defaults:
skills/info-stories/references/design-taste-gates.md - focused QA:
qa-post - focused render:
render-gif - optional community publisher:
share-demo
Research gates
Complete post creation may activate prose-specificity, voice-preservation, design-dials, structural-originality, reference-dna, contrast-discipline, evidence-traceability, and bounded-verification according to research/capability-notes/gates.json.
The final safety gates include identity provenance, typography render safety, evidence-traceability, and bounded-verification. They remain active even when the chosen creative direction is intentionally simple. The optional share-demo workflow inherits the final PASS as a publication prerequisite.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

