fable-domain
Skill6 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Discuss a domain with the user, research it from real sources, then generate a trusted skill bundle for it - a step-by-step workflow with a flowchart, a domain adapter, a trap fixture, and a smoke eval. Use when the user says "/fable-domain <sector>", "make a skill for <domain>", "add a domain to the fable method", or "give a lesser model Fable's workflow for <domain>". The bundle is the deliverable; a workflow without its flowchart, sources, and trap is not done.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Sahir619/fable-methodtheir own version, first seen Oct 3, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Sahir619/fable-method★ 2.3ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .codex/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fable-tend/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/fable-wise/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/fable-tend/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/fable-tend/site/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/fable-wise/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- public/llms.txtllms.txt
- get-fableSkill
- typesafe-aiSkill
- get-fableSkill
- get-fableSkill
- fable-architectureSkill
- fable-artifactSkill
- fable-configSkill
- fable-context-thriftSkill
- fable-councilSkill
- fable-coworkSkill
- fable-datavizSkill
- fable-delegateSkill
- fable-discoverSkill
- fable-ecoSkill
- fable-evalSkill
- fable-executeSkill
- fable-finish-your-turnSkill
- fable-handoffSkill
- fable-healSkill
- fable-judgeSkill
- fable-learningSkill
- fable-loopSkill
- fable-memorySkill
- fable-methodSkill
- fable-native-codeSkill
- fable-outcome-firstSkill
- fable-planSkill
- fable-prove-itSkill
- fable-recoverSkill
- fable-redteamSkill
- fable-releaseSkill
- fable-researchSkill
- fable-reviewSkill
- fable-runSkill
- fable-scope-disciplineSkill
- fable-securitySkill
- fable-simplifySkill
- fable-simulatorSkill
- fable-skill-creatorSkill
- fable-sparkSkill
- fable-tddSkill
- fable-tendSkill
- fable-verifySkill
- fable-wiseSkill
- get-fableSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 43
When the user asks to add or generate a domain adapter (/fable-domain <sector>).
- Distinctive: line 44
When expanding Fable's methodology to non-coding professional sectors.
- Distinctive: line 45
When creating a domain-specific trap fixture and evaluation suite.
- Distinctive: line 49
When the requested domain requires professional human licensure or presents high-harm risks (medical diagnosis, formal legal advice, …
- Very specific: line 50
When the domain does not differ fundamentally from standard software engineering (use fable-execute or fable-plan).
- Very specific: line 70
Read all existing adapters in references/domains/ and the governing template.
- Very specific: line 73
Write the adapter according to references/domains/TEMPLATE.md.
- Distinctive: line 77
Run repo checks to ensure structural integrity.
- Distinctive: line 78
Run smoke eval comparing bare model behavior vs adapter-directed behavior.
- Very specific: line 79
Run fable-judge adversarial audit over the bundle's claims and sources.
- Distinctive: line 90
Use web search to fetch authoritative primary documents and regulatory texts.
- Distinctive: line 91
Do not invent fictional regulatory citations or synthetic policy numbers.
- Distinctive: line 102
If web access is unavailable to verify real-world regulations, stop generation rather than hallucinating standards.
- Distinctive: line 103
If the smoke eval indicates no behavioral difference on the trap fixture, report the adapter as unproven.
- Distinctive: line 107
All four bundle deliverables created and verified: workflow flowchart, adapter, trap fixture, and smoke eval.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fable Domain
The fable-method ships domain adapters that translate its loop into a sector's nouns. This skill creates a new adapter and delivers a usable, step-by-step workflow with a flowchart for the domain.
Purpose
Generate validated, source-backed domain adapters and trap fixtures for new professional sectors (finance, marketing, legal compliance, devops, etc.). Translate general agent lifecycle discipline into domain-specific evidence standards and failure fraud tables.
When to Use
- When the user asks to add or generate a domain adapter (
/fable-domain <sector>). - When expanding Fable's methodology to non-coding professional sectors.
- When creating a domain-specific trap fixture and evaluation suite.
When NOT to Use
- When the requested domain requires professional human licensure or presents high-harm risks (medical diagnosis, formal legal advice, investment advice) — refuse and route to a qualified human.
- When the domain does not differ fundamentally from standard software engineering (use
fable-executeorfable-plan). - Generic skill authoring without domain-specific adapters (use
fable-skill-creator).
Inputs
sector_name: The industry or functional discipline requested (e.g.finance,marketing,data-analysis).user_requirements: Real-world use cases, trusted authorities, and non-negotiable boundaries provided by the user.
Expected Outputs
- Domain Workflow with Flowchart: Step-by-step approach distilled from research, plus a mermaid flowchart.
- Domain Adapter: Conforming to
references/domains/TEMPLATE.mdwith cited primary sources. - Trap Fixture: Evaluation scenario in
eval/scenarios/withGROUND-TRUTH.mddefining the sector's central fraud. - Smoke Eval: Initial control-vs-adapter validation runs.
Procedure
- Stage 1: Discuss: Adaptively clarify the use case, practitioner standards, trusted authorities, and forbidden actions. Enforce Red-lines (refusal for medical/legal/financial advice) and Scope stops (refusal if domain is standard software engineering).
- Stage 2: Research: Perform bounded web research against authoritative sources. Extract regulations, platform policies, practitioner evidence standards, and documented failure modes.
- Stage 3: Generate the Bundle:
- Read all existing adapters in
references/domains/and the governing template. - Define exact sector scope boundaries.
- Author the ordered workflow and mermaid flowchart.
- Write the adapter according to
references/domains/TEMPLATE.md. - Wire all routing surfaces (registry, catalog, docs).
- Build the trap fixture with objective violation markers.
- Read all existing adapters in
- Stage 4: Verify & Smoke-Eval:
- Run repo checks to ensure structural integrity.
- Run smoke eval comparing bare model behavior vs adapter-directed behavior.
- Run
fable-judgeadversarial audit over the bundle's claims and sources. - Deliver outcome-first completion report.
Decision Rules
- Red-Line Refusal: If a domain involves clinical medicine, formal legal counsel, or financial trading advice, refuse generation immediately.
- Scope Gate: If a requested sector's evidence consists merely of files and stack traces, stop and declare that core coding skills already cover it.
- Primary Source Mandate: Every regulatory threshold, compliance statute, or industry rule must cite a verified web source with access date.
Tool Policy
- Use web search to fetch authoritative primary documents and regulatory texts.
- Do not invent fictional regulatory citations or synthetic policy numbers.
- Generate standard Mermaid diagrams for all workflow visualizations.
Evidence Requirements
- Primary source URLs and verification dates in the adapter's Sources section.
- Verifiable trap fixture with reproducible failing/passing test runs.
- Passing
fable-judgeevaluation report.
Failure Handling
- If web access is unavailable to verify real-world regulations, stop generation rather than hallucinating standards.
- If the smoke eval indicates no behavioral difference on the trap fixture, report the adapter as unproven.
Completion Criteria
- All four bundle deliverables created and verified: workflow flowchart, adapter, trap fixture, and smoke eval.
- Zero red-line safety violations.
- Registry and documentation references cleanly synchronized.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

