agentic-workflow
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Pluripotent stem-cell framework and universal agentic toolchain for autonomous workflows. Use when designing, building, orchestrating, validating, or optimizing complex multi-step AI agent workflows across Research, Planning, and Implementation — even if the user says "build an autonomous pipeline", "design agent workflow", "execute in autopilot", "run ulw mode", or "setup quality gates". Do NOT use for simple single-file one-off edits without workflow structure.
- Pipes a download into a shell
- Installs packages
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nikhilw/structured-agentic-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- parcadei/Continuous-Claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2their own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3their own version, first seen Jan 14, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- nikhilw/structured-agentic-workflow★ 7same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/agentic-hooks.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/agentic-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/agenticworkflow.mdcCursor rule
- doctoral-writingSkill
- workflow-generatorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 39
Every workflow, tool, and subagent created or governed by this skill strictly inherits the 3 Absolute Criteria:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AgenticWorkflow: Universal Agentic Skill & Execution Toolchain
A pluripotent stem-cell framework and multi-agent execution engine that turns complex tasks into deterministic, self-verifying autonomous workflows.
Execution Invariant
$$\text{Intent} \xrightarrow{\text{Research}} \text{Plan (SOT state.yaml)} \xrightarrow{\text{Implementation}} \text{4-Layer Quality Gates} \xrightarrow{\text{pACS Delta}} \text{Verified Deliverable}$$
⚡ Dynamic Mode Router
Detect the desired mode from context or explicit flags:
| Mode | Trigger Phrases | Core Execution Flow |
| 1. DESIGN | "design workflow", "new pipeline", "workflow.md" | Research → Planning → Implementation 3-stage blueprint generation |
| 2. EXECUTE | "run workflow", "execute pipeline", "start step" | SOT state-machine driver with step-by-step deliverable generation |
| 3. AUTOPILOT | "autopilot", "fully automated", "hands-off" | Auto-approve (human) checkpoints with decision logs; enforce safety hooks |
| 4. ULW | "ulw", "ultrawork", "maximum rigor" | 3 Intensifiers: Sisyphus Persistence, Mandatory Decomposition, Retry Escalation |
| 5. VERIFY | "verify step", "quality gates", "run pacs" | L0 Anti-Skip → L1 Verification → L1.5 pACS → L2 Adversarial Review |
| 6. OPTIMIZE | "optimize workflow", "reduce cycle time", "streamline" | Lean bottleneck analysis, automation scoring, cycle time compression |
3 Absolute Criteria (Constitutional Canon)
Every workflow, tool, and subagent created or governed by this skill strictly inherits the 3 Absolute Criteria:
- Absolute Criterion 1: Quality of the Final Deliverable
Speed, token cost, workload, and length limits are completely ignored. The sole criterion for every decision is the quality of the final deliverable.
- Absolute Criterion 2: Single-File SOT + Hierarchical Memory
All shared state is concentrated in a single file (
state.yaml). SOT write permission belongs exclusively to the Orchestrator / Team Lead. Parallel agents never mutate shared files simultaneously. - Absolute Criterion 3: Code Change Protocol (CCP)
Before writing, modifying, adding, or deleting code, internally perform: Step 1 (Understand Intent) → Step 2 (Ripple Effect Analysis) → Step 3 (Change Plan). Governed by Coding Anchor Points (CAP-1~4).
4-Layer Quality Assurance Stack
flowchart TD
StepStart["Step Execution"] --> L0["L0: Anti-Skip Physical Guard (File exists & >= 100 bytes)"]
L0 -->|PASS| L1["L1: Verification Gate (100% functional goal achievement)"]
L0 -->|FAIL| Diag["Abductive Diagnosis"]
L1 -->|PASS| L15["L1.5: pACS Self-Rating (F/C/L Pre-mortem scoring)"]
L1 -->|FAIL| Diag
L15 -->|RED: <50| Diag
L15 -->|GREEN / YELLOW| L2["L2: Adversarial Review (@reviewer + @fact-checker)"]
L2 -->|PASS| SOT["Advance SOT (current_step + 1)"]
L2 -->|FAIL| Diag
Diag --> Retry["Retry with Alternative Hypothesis (Max 3)"]- L0 Anti-Skip Guard: Deterministically verifies deliverable exists on disk and is non-empty (
MIN_OUTPUT_SIZE >= 100 bytes). - L1 Verification Gate: Semantic verification that all acceptance criteria are 100% achieved.
- L1.5 pACS (Predicted Agent Confidence Score): Pre-mortem evaluation across Faithfulness, Completeness, Logic. $pACS = \min(F, C, L)$.
GREEN (>= 70): Auto-advance.YELLOW (50 - 69): Flag weak dimension in Decision Log and proceed.RED (< 50): Halt and trigger rework.
- L2 Adversarial Review: Independent Generator-Critic evaluation by
@reviewerand@fact-checker.
Autonomous Self-Fueling Engine & Circuit Breaker
The system operates as an end-to-end autonomous engine with built-in energy management:
- Self-Fueling & Energy Loop: Dynamic token and context headroom monitoring with automatic RLM state compaction and refueling checkpoints before context exhaustion.
- Fable Circuit Breaker: State transitions
CLOSED→OPEN→HALF_OPEN. Automatically halts speculative thrashing when consecutive failure streak $\ge 2$, isolates root causes via Abductive Diagnosis (diagnose_context.py), and executes structured recovery. - Clean Code Guard: Automated AST guard pass checking the 24 Clean Code imperatives (small functions, intent-revealing names, maximum 4 parameters, no swallowed exceptions, no fake success mocks).
- AI Engineering Evaluation: Integrated four-fifths disparate impact testing ($\ge 0.80$), PSI distribution drift monitoring, and adversarial prompt-injection sanitization.
- OmniSkill Dynamic Intent Routing: Decomposes complex natural language intent into an optimal multi-step DAG across Research, Planning, Implementation, and Verification.
CLI & Toolchain Integration
# Launch autonomous end-to-end autopilot workflow with self-fueling & energy management
agentic-workflow autopilot --title "Production Pipeline" --goal "Autonomous Delivery"
# Run Clean Code Guard audit pass (SOLID, 24 Imperatives, AI failure modes)
agentic-workflow guard [directory]
# Execute AI Engineer fairness, drift, and prompt-injection evaluation gates
agentic-workflow eval
# Query multi-agent observable trace logs and spans
agentic-workflow traces
# Run OmniSkill dynamic intent routing and multi-host validation
agentic-workflow omni-skill route "build an autonomous pipeline"
agentic-workflow omni-skill validate
# Check live workflow dashboard and observability metrics
agentic-workflow status
# Run full automated test suite (safety, guard, MAS, evaluator)
agentic-workflow testUniversal Multi-Agent & Multi-Host Distribution
Install and use AgenticWorkflow instantly across any platform or AI harness:
# Skills.sh / Vercel AI (Universal Agent Discovery)
npx skills add imMamdouhaboammar/agentic-workflow
# Zero-Install CLI (Bun & Node/npx)
bunx agentic-workflow --help
npx agentic-workflow --help
# Python Environment (pip / PyPI)
pip install agentic-workflow
# Universal Multi-Agent Installer (Claude, Gemini, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode)
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/imMamdouhaboammar/agentic-workflow/main/install.sh | bashDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

