agentleFS
imMamdouhaboammarimMamdouhaboammar/agentic-workflow/.cursor/rules/agenticworkflow.mdc

agentic-workflow / rules

Cursor rule0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

AgenticWorkflow Methodology — Applies to all tasks in this repository

The file

We split this agenticworkflow.mdc into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    All Absolute Criteria, design principles, and workflow structures are defined in AGENTS.md.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Every child system structurally embeds the parent genome: 3 Absolute Criteria, Single-File SOT, 4-Layer Verification, Safety Hooks, and …

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Every workflow consists of three stages: Research → Planning → Implementation.

    line 40
  4. Distinctive:

    P1: Remove noise via deterministic scripts before passing context to AI.

    line 67
  5. Distinctive:

    Technical Terminology: Keep standard English terms (SOT, Agent, Orchestrator, Hooks, etc.)

    line 77
  6. Distinctive:

    Visualization: Prefer clean Mermaid diagrams with quoted labels

    line 78

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
agenticworkflow.mdc
---
description: "AgenticWorkflow Methodology — Applies to all tasks in this repository"
alwaysApply: true
---

# AgenticWorkflow — Cursor Directive

> All AI agents working on this project must follow the AgenticWorkflow methodology.

## Essential References

All Absolute Criteria, design principles, and workflow structures are defined in `AGENTS.md`.
**You must read `AGENTS.md` and adhere to its rules.**
For architectural design and philosophy, refer to `AGENTICWORKFLOW-ARCHITECTURE-AND-PHILOSOPHY.md`.
For historical design decisions, refer to `DECISION-LOG.md` (ADR).

## Genetic Design (DNA Inheritance)

This project is a parent organism that births child agentic workflow systems.
Every child system structurally embeds the parent genome: 3 Absolute Criteria, Single-File SOT, 4-Layer Verification, Safety Hooks, and Memory Systems.
Details: `soul.md`, `AGENTS.md §1`.

## Absolute Criteria (Core Summary)

### Absolute Criterion 1: Quality of the Final Deliverable
> Speed, token cost, workload, and length limits are completely ignored.
> The sole criterion for every decision is the **quality of the final deliverable**.

### Absolute Criterion 2: Single-File SOT
> All shared state is concentrated in a single file (`state.yaml`). Write permission is held exclusively by the Orchestrator / Team Lead. Parallel agents concurrently modifying the same file is strictly prohibited.

### Absolute Criterion 3: Code Change Protocol (CCP)
> Before writing, modifying, adding, or deleting code, you must internally perform 3 steps:
> Step 1: Understand Intent → Step 2: Ripple Effect Analysis → Step 3: Change Plan.
> Analysis depth scales proportionally with change scope (Minor: Step 1 only, Standard: full 3 steps, Large-scale: full 3 steps + mandatory user approval).
> **Coding Anchor Points (CAP-1~4)**: Think Before Coding, Simplicity First, Goal-Based Execution, Surgical Changes. Details: `AGENTS.md §2`.

## Basic Workflow Structure

Every workflow consists of three stages: **Research** → **Planning** → **Implementation**.

## Cursor Implementation Mapping

| AgenticWorkflow Concept | Cursor Implementation |
|---|---|
| Specialized Agent | Role specification via Cursor Agent Mode |
| Automated Verification | Verification rule files in `.cursor/rules/` or external Python scripts |
| Reusable Modules | Domain-specific rule files in `.cursor/rules/` |
| SOT State Management | `state.yaml` file — single write point principle applies identically (`state.yaml`, `state.yml`, `state.json`) |
| Autopilot Mode | Controlled by `autopilot.enabled` field in SOT. Auto-approves `(human)` review steps. Anti-Skip Guard verifies deliverable existence + 100 bytes minimum. See `AGENTS.md §5.1`. |
| ULW (Ultrawork) Mode | Activated when `ulw` is in prompt. Thoroughness intensity overlay. 3 Intensifiers: Sisyphus Persistence (3 retries), Mandatory Task Decomposition, Bounded Retry Escalation. See `AGENTS.md §5.1.1`. |
| Verification Protocol | Verifies 100% functional goal achievement of step deliverables. Verification Gate layer sitting atop physical Anti-Skip Guard. Retries up to 10 times (15 with ULW). See `AGENTS.md §5.3`. |
| pACS (Self-Confidence Scoring) | 3-dimensional self-evaluation (Faithfulness, Completeness, Logic) with mandatory Pre-mortem protocol and min-score principle. GREEN (>=70): proceed, YELLOW (50-69): flag and proceed, RED (<50): rework. See `AGENTS.md §5.4`. |
| Adversarial Review (Enhanced L2) | Independent evaluation replacing legacy calibration. `@reviewer` (critical analysis of code/deliverables) + `@fact-checker` (external fact verification). P1 validation (`validate_review.py` R1-R5) ensures review rigor. See `AGENTS.md §5.5`. |
| Terminology Protocol | Maintains terminology consistency via `translations/glossary.yaml`. P1 validation (`validate_translation.py` T1-T9, `validate_verification.py` V1a-V1c). |
| Predictive Debugging (L-1) | Pre-tool warning on risky files based on error history. `predictive_debug_guard.py` (PreToolUse warning) + `aggregate_risk_scores()` (SessionStart P1 aggregation) + `validate_risk_scores()` (RS1-RS6 validation). Cached in `risk-scores.json`. |

## Context Preservation

In environments without automatic Claude Code hook dispatching:
- **Notepad Feature**: Record working progress in Cursor Notepad.
- **SOT-Based Recovery**: Restore workflow state by reading `state.yaml`.
- **Manual Snapshot**: Save progress to markdown snapshot files at key milestones.

## Core Design Principles

- **P1**: Remove noise via deterministic scripts before passing context to AI.
- **P2**: Maximize quality through specialized delegation.
- **P3**: Explicit paths for all resources; no placeholders.
- **P4**: User questions: maximum 4, ~3 options each.

## Language and Style Rules

- **Framework Documentation & User Dialogue**: Pure English
- **Workflow Execution**: Pure English (maximizes reasoning performance — Absolute Criterion 1)
- **Deliverables**: English primary deliverables
- **Technical Terminology**: Keep standard English terms (SOT, Agent, Orchestrator, Hooks, etc.)
- **Visualization**: Prefer clean Mermaid diagrams with quoted labels
- **Depth**: Comprehensive, data-backed exposition over superficial summaries

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.