agentleFS
igmarinigmarin/rails-agent-skills/skills/write-tests/SKILL.md

write-tests

Skill26 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when writing or cleaning up Rails RSpec. Run the spec and keep the real output. Trigger words: write spec, rspec, test-driven, write tests.

76 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use close-spec, design-with-images and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dzhngSkill

    close-spec

    When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • dzhngSkill

    design-with-images

    Explore UI and visual design with image generation, then iterate the real implementation against the user-selected concept. Use when brainstorming visual directions, offering mockup variants, or implementing an approved generated design; do not stop at the mockups or the first code approximation.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • transitive-bullshitSkill

    compare-screenshots

    Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LucasMatuszewskiSkill

    audit-agents

    Audit and maintain agent configuration files (.claude/agents, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, agent-memory). Checks for duplicates, outdated info, naming conflicts, wrong technical facts, and files over 200 lines. Fixes all issues and commits.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • wolverin0Skill

    audit-decisions

    Standardize remediation decisions, baseline-policy entries, and legal-review banners for accepted, deferred, or policy-blocked audit findings.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • rhnfzlSkill

    explore-unknowns

    Walk the user through mapping the unknowns of a task before, during, and after they build it, and hand them a four-quadrant map (settled ground, open decisions, taste, and landmines) they keep. Reach for this eagerly whenever a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, a build-queue or architecture-changing task is about to start, a mid-build deviation needs capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Trigger even when the skill is not named: "do a blindspot pass", "find my unknown unknowns", "interview me about this change", "brainstorm the approach for a task I am about to build", "help me scope this", "what am I missing here", "plan this before I build", "I know nothing about X in this codebase". When a territory profile is present it reads memory and the graph first and feeds the map into the build pipeline; without one it degrades to a plain general map. Not for trivial or mechanical tasks with clear acceptance criteria, single-fact lookups, pure debugging of a known symptom, or pure code review, those have their own tools. Do not use it to run the build itself; the map is the deliverable and implementation remains a separate task, whether it has not started or is already underway.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +5 more from dzhng

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 71 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the task is to write, review, or clean up RSpec tests.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    When driving new behaviour with RSpec, follow this sequence:

    line 39
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow assets/tdd_proof_checklist.md and assets/output_checklist.md.

    line 102

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 71 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Write Tests

Use this skill when the task is to write, review, or clean up RSpec tests.

Quick Reference

AspectRule
Spec typesModel: domain logic / pure domain → start here; Request: HTTP endpoints; Job: background processing; Service/PORO: clean Ruby; System: E2E cross-layer journey (sparingly)
AssertionsTest behavior, not implementation
FactoriesMinimal attributes; traits for options; prefer build/build_stubbed over create
MockingStub external boundaries at class level (e.g. allow(Client).to receive); no Active Record mocking
Service specsRequired: describe '.call' and subject(:result) (see assets/output_checklist.md)
let vs let!Default to let; use let! only when object must exist before action
Example namesPresent tense; no should; no and (see assets/output_checklist.md)

HARD-GATE

DO NOT write implementation code before a failing test exists.
Run bundle exec rspec and keep the real failure class and message.

Core Process

When driving new behaviour with RSpec, follow this sequence:

  1. Write the failing spec — pick the smallest spec type that exercises the intended behaviour (model > service > request > system), as shown in the Spec types row above.
  2. Run it and confirm the failure message — show the concrete RED failure class/message. Do not leave this as a placeholder template; do not use illustrative e.g. failure examples in the final artifact.
  3. Implement the minimum code to make the spec pass.
  4. Refactor — clean up duplication and naming while keeping the suite green.
  5. Verify — run the full relevant spec file, then the suite, before committing.

For output format and RED/GREEN proof requirements, see assets/tdd_proof_checklist.md.

Service Spec (anchor pattern)

RSpec.describe Invoices::MarkOverdue do
  describe '.call' do
    subject(:result) { described_class.call(invoice: invoice) }

    context 'when the invoice is overdue and unpaid' do
      let(:invoice) { create(:invoice, due_date: 2.days.ago, paid_at: nil) }
      it 'marks the invoice overdue' do
        expect { result }.to change { invoice.reload.overdue? }.from(false).to(true)
      end
    end
  end
end

One Behavior Per Example

Split and in it/specify descriptions every time — no exceptions.

# BAD — two assertions; if the first fails, the second never runs
it 'returns 201 and creates the record' do; end

# GOOD — one observable outcome per example
it 'returns 201' do; end
it 'creates the record' do; end

Flaky Tests & Deterministic Assertions

CauseFix
Time-dependent logicfreeze_time / travel_to; never set past dates as shortcut
State leakageEach example sets up own state; avoid before(:all)
Async jobsqueue_adapter = :test + have_enqueued_job; never assert side-effects imperatively
External HTTPWebMock / VCR; never allow real network in CI
DB state bleedTransactional fixtures or DatabaseCleaner; never share let! across contexts
Race conditionsExplicit Capybara waits; avoid sleep
Imprecise assertionschange.from().to() over final state; exact values over be_truthy/be_falsey; see rule 16

Extended Resources (Progressive Disclosure)

Load these files only when their specific content is needed:

  • assets/complete_example.md — A complete, step-by-step example of a high-scoring answer.md showing plan, spec, realistic Observed RED/GREEN outputs, and verification tables.
  • assets/examples.md — For code examples of service specs, shared examples, and factory design.
  • assets/spec_templates.md — Standard templates for different types of specs.
  • assets/tdd_proof_checklist.md — Use when the task involves new behavior; defines RED/GREEN proof format, output formatting rules, and GREEN progress bar requirements.
  • assets/output_checklist.md — Complete 18-point checklist for RSpec output structure, conventions, and self-auditing; also defines all output style rules (spec structure, file path mirroring, frozen_string_literal, subject(:result), and TDD proof format).

Output Style

Follow assets/tdd_proof_checklist.md and assets/output_checklist.md. Show real RED/GREEN command output. One behavior per example.

Integration

SkillWhen to chain
plan-testsFirst-slice choice is not obvious
test-serviceThe slice is a service .call
tddFull feature loop through PR

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.