agentleFS
igmarinigmarin/rails-agent-skills/skills/optimize-performance/SKILL.md

optimize-performance

Skill26 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when investigating N+1s, slow queries, caching, or query plans in Rails. Profile before changing code. Trigger words: N+1, slow, performance, caching, EXPLAIN.

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When completing a performance optimization, output MUST follow this seven-step report order.

    line 42
  2. Very specific:

    Use the db-query-matchers gem or a custom make_database_queries matcher.

    line 93
  3. Very specific:

    Run directly in rails dbconsole (PostgreSQL) after applying an index or query change:

    line 95

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Optimize Performance

Identify and fix performance bottlenecks in Rails applications.

Quick Reference

ToolUse
bulletN+1 detection in development
rack-mini-profilerEndpoint timing breakdown
EXPLAIN ANALYZEQuery plan analysis

HARD-GATE

NEVER optimize without a baseline measurement
ALWAYS write a regression spec before optimizing (query count assertion)
ALWAYS verify with EXPLAIN ANALYZE for database changes

NEVER write the report as "I applied includes(:author), then wrote a spec
to lock it in." The spec MUST be written and shown failing BEFORE the fix
appears in your output. Reordering for narrative flow fails the audit even
when the underlying work was correct.

Output Style

When completing a performance optimization, output MUST follow this seven-step report order. Each step must appear in output:

# Performance Optimization — [Description]

## 1. Baseline
<N> queries for <endpoint/action> — source: <log line / profiler output>

## 2. Bottleneck
<N+1 on association X / missing index on column Y> — tool: <bullet / rack-mini-profiler / EXPLAIN ANALYZE>

## 3. Regression Spec — RED
`make_database_queries(count: <N>)` at <path>:<line> — failure: expected <M>, got <N>

## 4. Fix
<path>:<line> — <includes(:association) / add_index / cache block>

## 5. Regression Spec — GREEN
Spec passes ✓ (<M> queries)

## 6. EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Before: Seq Scan, actual time=<X>ms → After: Index Scan, actual time=<Y>ms

## 7. Quantified Improvement
Queries: <N> → <M> | p95: <X>ms → <Y>ms

Language: English unless explicitly requested otherwise.

Extended Resources

Less-Obvious Optimization

# Use counter_cache to avoid COUNT queries in loops
# In migration: add_column :users, :posts_count, :integer, default: 0
# In Post model: belongs_to :user, counter_cache: true
user.posts_count  # no extra query

Regression Spec (Query Count Assertion)

RSpec.describe "Post index performance" do
  it "loads posts with authors in a fixed number of queries" do
    create_list(:post, 10, :with_author)

    expect do
      get posts_path
    end.to make_database_queries(count: 2) # 1 posts query + 1 authors query
  end
end

Use the db-query-matchers gem or a custom make_database_queries matcher.

Run directly in rails dbconsole (PostgreSQL) after applying an index or query change:

EXPLAIN ANALYZE
  SELECT posts.*, users.name
  FROM posts
  INNER JOIN users ON users.id = posts.author_id
  WHERE posts.published = true;

Reference Files and External Links

Load these files only when their specific content is needed:

  • references/tools.md — Use when you need detailed Bullet, rack-mini-profiler, or EXPLAIN ANALYZE configuration and installation steps

External references:

Integration

SkillWhen to chain
write-testsFor regression specs
review-migrationWhen adding an index

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.