agentleFS
igmarinigmarin/elixir-phoenix-skills/skills/security-essentials/SKILL.md

security-essentials

Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Provides security guidelines and patterns for Elixir/Phoenix applications. Use when writing auth, token handling, redirects, or user input processing, or when any security concern arises. Covers atom exhaustion, SQL injection, open redirects, XSS, sensitive data in logs, timing attacks, CSRF, and dependency auditing. Trigger words: security, atom exhaustion, SQL injection, XSS, open redirect, timing attack, CSRF, Sobelow.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill before writing ANY security-sensitive code.

    line 19
  2. Very specific:

    Never interpolate strings into Ecto queries.

    line 123
  3. Very specific:

    Never redirect to user-controlled URLs.

    line 159
  4. Very specific:

    Avoid raw/1; sanitize with HtmlSanitizeEx if HTML is required.

    line 189
  5. Very specific:

    Use Plug.Crypto.secure_compare/2 for token comparison.

    line 224
  6. Distinctive:

    Never disable Phoenix's built-in CSRF protection.

    line 292

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Security Essentials

Use this skill before writing ANY security-sensitive code.

RULES — Follow these with no exceptions

1. Never call String.to_atom/1 on user input — use String.to_existing_atom/1 or a whitelist case (Atom Table Exhaustion) 2. Never interpolate user input into an Ecto fragment or raw SQL — use ^value bindings, field/2, or $1/$2 placeholders (SQL Injection) 3. Never redirect to a user-controlled URL — use ~p"..." verified routes or a whitelist of allowed paths (Open Redirects) 4. Never render user content with raw/1 in HEEx — let auto-escaping run, or sanitize with HtmlSanitizeEx first (Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)) 5. Never log secrets — log identifiers (user_id, email), never passwords, tokens, or PII (Sensitive Data in Logs) 6. Always compare tokens with Plug.Crypto.secure_compare/2 — never ==, which leaks length/content via timing (Timing Attacks) 7. Never disable Phoenix CSRF protection — keep :protect_from_forgery in the browser pipeline and use <.form>, not raw <form> (CSRF Protection) 8. Always authorize before returning a record — verify ownership to prevent parameter tampering and IDOR (Common Vulnerable Patterns) 9. Always run mix deps.audit && mix hex.audit && mix sobelow before merge — fail CI on any HIGH or CRITICAL finding (Dependency Auditing)

See assets/security_checklist.md for a copy-paste pre-merge checklist covering input validation, auth, secrets, and production hardening.

Security Review Process

Apply this sequence whenever writing or reviewing security-sensitive code:

  1. Identify attack surface — list all user inputs, external data sources, and network boundaries
  2. Apply RULES — implement the feature following all rules above
  3. Run mix sobelow --router MyAppWeb.Router — static analysis on your router and controllers
  4. Run mix sobelow --private — check private functions for vulnerabilities
  5. Review findings by severity — HIGH severity first, then MEDIUM, then LOW
  6. Fix each finding — apply the correct pattern from the sections below
  7. Re-run sobelow — repeat until no issues reported
  8. Run full audit — mix deps.audit && mix hex.audit && mix sobelow before merging
  9. Test manually — verify with curl/introspection that expected inputs are rejected

Common Vulnerable Patterns

Parameter Tampering

❌ Bad — trusting user input:

def index(conn, %{"status" => status}) do
  users = Repo.all(from u in User, where: u.status == ^status)
  render(conn, "index.html", users: users)
end

✅ Good — validate against allowed values:

@allowedStatuses ~w(active inactive pending)
def index(conn, %{"status" => status}) do
  if status in @allowedStatuses do
    users = Repo.all(from u in User, where: u.status == ^status)
    render(conn, "index.html", users: users)
  else
    put_status(conn, :bad_request)
    |> json(%{error: "Invalid status"})
  end
end

IDOR (Insecure Direct Object Reference)

❌ Bad — no authorization check:

def show(conn, %{"id" => id}) do
  user = Repo.get!(User, id)
  render(conn, "show.html", user: user)
end

✅ Good — verify ownership:

def show(conn, %{"id" => id}) do
  current_user = conn.assigns.current_user

  case Accounts.get_user_for_current_user(current_user, id) do
    {:ok, user} -> render(conn, "show.html", user: user)
    {:error, :not_found} -> put_status(conn, :not_found) |> json(%{error: "Not found"})
    {:error, :unauthorized} -> put_status(conn, :forbidden) |> json(%{error: "Forbidden"})
  end
end

Atom Table Exhaustion

❌ Bad — user controls the atom:

role = String.to_atom(params["role"])

✅ Good — whitelist approach:

case params["role"] do
  "admin" -> :admin
  "user" -> :user
  "moderator" -> :moderator
  _ -> {:error, :invalid_role}
end

SQL Injection

Never interpolate strings into Ecto queries; use ^variable or $1/$2 placeholders.

❌ Bad — string interpolation in fragment:

# NEVER do this — user can inject SQL through field or value
from(u in User, where: fragment("lower(#{field}) = ?", ^value))
from(u in User, where: fragment("#{condition}", []))

❌ Bad — using unvalidated input in raw SQL:

# NEVER do this — even with ~s() sigil
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query(Repo, "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '#{name}'", [])

✅ Good — parameterized fragment with field/1:

# Safe — field is an atom from schema, value is parameterized
from(u in User, where: fragment("lower(?) = ?", field(u, :status), ^value))

✅ Good — parameterized raw SQL:

Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query(Repo, "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", [id])
Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query(Repo, "SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = $1 AND status = $2", [name, status])

✅ Good — Ecto query expressions always safe:

# Ecto query expressions are always parameterized
from(u in User, where: u.status == ^status and u.name == ^name)

Open Redirects

Never redirect to user-controlled URLs; use ~p"..." or a whitelist.

❌ Bad — user controls redirect destination:

def create(conn, %{"redirect_to" => redirect_to} = params) do
  redirect(conn, to: redirect_to)
end

✅ Good — use verified routes:

redirect(conn, to: ~p"/dashboard")

✅ Good — validate against known paths:

@allowed_redirects ["/dashboard", "/profile", "/settings"]

def create(conn, %{"redirect_to" => redirect_to} = params) do
  if redirect_to in @allowed_redirects do
    redirect(conn, to: redirect_to)
  else
    redirect(conn, to: ~p"/dashboard")
  end
end

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Avoid raw/1; sanitize with HtmlSanitizeEx if HTML is required.

❌ Bad — bypasses escaping:

<%= raw(@user_bio) %>

✅ Good — let Phoenix auto-escape:

<%= @user_bio %>

✅ Good — sanitize if HTML rendering is required:

<%= raw(HtmlSanitizeEx.html5(@user_bio)) %>

Sensitive Data in Logs

❌ Bad:

Logger.info("User login", email: email, password: password)
Logger.debug("API call", token: api_token, response: resp)

✅ Good:

Logger.info("User login", email: email, user_id: user.id)
Logger.debug("API call", endpoint: url, status: resp.status)

Timing Attacks

Use Plug.Crypto.secure_compare/2 for token comparison; never ==.

❌ Bad — timing-unsafe:

def verify_token(provided_token, stored_token) do
  provided_token == stored_token
end

✅ Good — constant-time comparison:

def verify_token(provided_token, stored_token) do
  Plug.Crypto.secure_compare(provided_token, stored_token)
end

Dependency Auditing

# Check for known vulnerabilities in dependencies
mix deps.audit

# Verify package checksums against Hex
mix hex.audit

# Static security analysis on your code
mix sobelow --router MyAppWeb.Router

# Run all three before any merge
mix deps.audit && mix hex.audit && mix sobelow --config

Sobelow categories:

CategorySeverity
Config (hardcoded secrets, insecure config)HIGH
SQL injectionHIGH
Remote Code (unsafe eval/apply)CRITICAL
Cross-Site ScriptingHIGH
Function ClobberingMEDIUM
Denial of Service (atom exhaustion)HIGH

Add to CI pipeline:

# .github/workflows/security.yml
- name: Security Audit
  run: |
    mix deps.audit
    mix hex.audit
    mix sobelow --config
# mix.exs
defp aliases do
  [
    "security.check": ["deps.audit", "hex.audit", "sobelow --config"]
  ]
end

Interpretation: Any Sobelow finding of HIGH or CRITICAL severity MUST be fixed before merging. LOW findings should be tracked and addressed within 2 sprints.

CSRF Protection

Never disable Phoenix's built-in CSRF protection.

# Phoenix forms automatically include CSRF tokens
# <.form> component handles this — never use raw <form> tags

# API pipeline should NOT include :protect_from_forgery
pipeline :api do
  plug :accepts, ["json"]
  # No :protect_from_forgery — APIs use Bearer tokens instead
end

Common Pitfalls

❌ Don't✅ Do
String.to_atom(params["role"]) on user inputWhitelist with a case, or use String.to_existing_atom/1
fragment("lower(#{field}) = ?", ^value)fragment("lower(?) = ?", field(u, :status), ^value)
redirect(conn, to: params["redirect_to"])redirect(conn, to: ~p"/dashboard") or a whitelist
<%= raw(@user_bio) %> in HEEx<%= @user_bio %>, or raw(HtmlSanitizeEx.html5(@user_bio))
Compare tokens with provided == storedPlug.Crypto.secure_compare(provided, stored)
Logger.info("login", password: pw, token: t)Log user_id / email; never secrets or PII
Repo.get!(User, id) with no ownership checkAuthorize in the context before returning the record

Integration

PredecessorThis SkillSuccessor
phoenix-auth-customizationsecurity-essentialsphoenix-authorization-patterns
ecto-essentialssecurity-essentialstelemetry-essentials

Companion skills: phoenix-authorization-patterns, phoenix-auth-customization, phoenix-liveview-auth, code-quality.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.