agentleFS
hsigstadhsigstad/research-kit/skills/questions/SKILL.md

questions

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Populate or update a project's docs/questions.md — the 3-5 policy-relevant research questions the project answers, each synthesizing evidence from multiple hypotheses. Use when the user wants to draft, update, or audit questions.md.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use facts.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ansvisorSkill

    facts

    Checks every draft against your approved brand facts.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Not a staging area for half-formed ideas (that's thinking.md)

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Not a list of descriptive queries ("what share of cases have X?")

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Not a restatement of hypotheses (those have their own doc)

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Not a research agenda (keep it to what THIS project answers)

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    Do NOT read theory.md, literature.md, institutions.md unless a specific question's answer needs institutional context.

    line 50
  6. Distinctive:

    Never renamed once created (same stability rule as H: slugs)

    line 80
  7. Distinctive:

    Write for a non-specialist.

    line 98
  8. Very specific:

    Update after each /connect-results (or equivalent) run that changes the evidence base for any relevant hypothesis.

    line 102
  9. Distinctive:

    Read summary.md to identify the paper's core motivation.

    line 120
  10. Distinctive:

    Read hypotheses.md to understand what's testable.

    line 121
  11. Very specific:

    What to edit: Only the target question's Current working answer and Open sections.

    line 139
  12. Distinctive:

    Every H: slug referenced in questions.md exists in hypotheses.md

    line 148
  13. Distinctive:

    Every question has at least one hypothesis with evidence strength above "Not tested"

    line 149
  14. Distinctive:

    No orphan questions (all hypotheses mapped to at least one question) — orphan hypotheses are fine (not every test maps to a big question)

    line 154

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/questions — Populate docs/questions.md

Draft or maintain a project's docs/questions.md: the small set of policy-relevant questions the research answers. Each question aggregates evidence from multiple hypotheses and maintains a current working answer that evolves as new results come in.

These are synthesis questions — the "so what?" that motivates the paper and frames the contribution. They sit above the hypothesis layer: hypotheses are testable predictions; questions are what the predictions collectively tell us.

What questions.md is NOT

  • Not a staging area for half-formed ideas (that's thinking.md)
  • Not a list of descriptive queries ("what share of cases have X?")
  • Not a restatement of hypotheses (those have their own doc)
  • Not a research agenda (keep it to what THIS project answers)

Arguments

  • /questions — infer project from CWD
  • /questions <project-slug> — run against a specific project
  • /questions --update <Q:slug> [--artifact <path>] — update one question's working answer after new evidence (e.g., from /connect-results)
  • /questions --audit — check for stale answers, missing hypothesis refs, orphan questions with no tested hypotheses
  • /questions --extend — propose a new question (requires justification)

Finding the workspace root

The workspace root contains CLAUDE.md alongside projects/, pipelines/, ideas/, research/. If inside a project, search upward. $ROOT for paths; $PROJ = $ROOT/projects/<slug>/.

What to read

  1. $PROJ/CLAUDE.md — current focus
  2. $PROJ/docs/summary.md — the main research question (required)
  3. $PROJ/docs/questions.md — existing questions (if any; match template)
  4. $PROJ/docs/hypotheses.md — all hypotheses with evidence strengths
  5. $PROJ/docs/findings.md — empirical results (if exists)
  6. $PROJ/docs/reference/analysis-index.yaml — what's been tested (if exists)

Do NOT read theory.md, literature.md, institutions.md unless a specific question's answer needs institutional context. Questions synthesize from hypotheses, not from primary sources.

Entry template

Each question follows this structure:

### Q:<slug>: <Question in natural language?>

**Relevant hypotheses:** H:<slug1>, H:<slug2>, ...

**Current working answer:**
<2-5 sentences synthesizing what the tested hypotheses tell us.
Cite specific numbers from results. Note where evidence is strong
vs suggestive. Write as you would for a non-specialist.>

**Open:** <What remains untested or ambiguous. Reference specific
H: slugs with their status (not tested / queued / interpreted).>

Conventions

Slugs

Each question has a stable slug prefixed with Q: (e.g., Q:does-favoritism-exist, Q:how-circumvented). Slugs are:

  • Lowercase, hyphenated, 2-5 words
  • Unique within the project
  • Never renamed once created (same stability rule as H: slugs)
  • Used for cross-referencing in analysis files, index tags, and prose

Scope

  • Aim for around 5 questions per project. This is a soft limit — adding a 6th or 7th is fine if genuinely warranted, but each new question should pass the bar: "would a policymaker or seminar audience ask this?" If not, it's probably a hypothesis or a thinking.md note, not a research question.
  • Questions must be answerable (at least partially) by the project's data and design. Aspirational questions belong in thinking.md.
  • Questions should be policy-relevant or have clear "so what?" value. Pure mechanism questions ("through which channel?") are fine if the channel has policy implications.

Working answers

  • Write for a non-specialist. No jargon, no regression notation.
  • Cite specific numbers from results (coefficients, percentages).
  • Be honest about uncertainty. "The evidence suggests..." not "We have shown..."
  • Update after each /connect-results (or equivalent) run that changes the evidence base for any relevant hypothesis.
  • Date-stamp is NOT needed — git history tracks when answers changed.

Relationship to other docs

  • summary.md states the main research question in 1-2 sentences. questions.md decomposes it into answerable sub-questions.
  • hypotheses.md contains the testable predictions. questions.md groups them and synthesizes their answers.
  • findings.md records individual empirical results. questions.md interprets what they mean collectively.
  • thinking.md holds open-ended speculation. When a thinking.md note matures into something the project can answer, it may become a question. Most won't.

Draft protocol (new file)

  1. Read summary.md to identify the paper's core motivation.
  2. Read hypotheses.md to understand what's testable.
  3. Identify 3-5 questions that a seminar audience or policymaker would ask, such that the hypotheses collectively address them.
  4. For each question: list the relevant H: slugs, draft a working answer from current evidence, note what's still open.
  5. Present the list to the user for confirmation before writing.

Update mode (--update Q:<slug>)

Surgical edit of one question's working answer. Triggered when new evidence arrives (typically after /connect-results interprets a returned analysis).

Minimal read set:

  1. $PROJ/docs/questions.md — locate the target entry
  2. $PROJ/docs/hypotheses.md — read the updated hypothesis/hypotheses
  3. The triggering analysis file (if referenced)

What to edit: Only the target question's Current working answer and Open sections. Do not touch other questions.

Output: The edited questions.md plus a one-sentence summary of what changed in the working answer.

Audit mode (--audit)

Check without writing:

  • Every H: slug referenced in questions.md exists in hypotheses.md
  • Every question has at least one hypothesis with evidence strength above "Not tested"
  • Working answers are consistent with current evidence strengths in hypotheses.md (e.g., don't claim "strong evidence" if all relevant hypotheses say "Moderate" or "Weak")
  • No orphan questions (all hypotheses mapped to at least one question) — orphan hypotheses are fine (not every test maps to a big question)

Report findings as a bulleted list.

Integration with other skills

  • /connect-results should suggest a /questions --update when an interpreted result changes the evidence base for a question
  • /next proposal mode can reference open items in questions.md
  • /hypothesis --update should note if the change affects a question's working answer

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.