distill
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
The #60 wiki-distiller (spec 2026-08-18 §3): batch-mine L1 narratives newer than the stored watermark for durable learnings the live wrap gate missed, and land them through the single write door, producer="distiller", capped at WRITE_CAP writes per run.
75 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kylehughes/distillation-for-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- komluk/scaffoldingtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- theexperiencecompany/gaiatheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- JHostalek/dotclaudetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use layout, shape and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
owshq-mecSkilllayout
Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.
Also in 8 projects that use this
HAR5HA-7663Skillshape
Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.
Also in 11 projects that use this
ReScienceLabSkillarchive
Archive session learnings, debugging solutions, and deployment logs to .archive/yyyy-mm-dd/ as indexed markdown with searchable tags. Use when completing a significant task, resolving a tricky bug, deploying, or when the user says \"archive this\". Maintains .archive/MEMORY.md index for cross-session knowledge reuse.
Also in 3 projects that use this
klauswgSkillckm:design-system
Token architecture, component specifications, and slide generation. Three-layer tokens (primitive→semantic→component), CSS variables, spacing/typography scales, component specs, strategic slide creation. Use for design tokens, systematic design, brand-compliant presentations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
iovisorSkillevolve
Evolve uBPF through a gated spec-first workflow that propagates approved changes through requirements, design, validation, implementation, and RFC alignment artifacts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
bidodevSkilldevils-advocate
Challenges decisions, plans, and code by systematically arguing the opposing side. Surfaces risks, pokes holes in assumptions, and stress-tests thinking before committing. Supports intensity levels (gentle, balanced, ruthless, linus) and works with conversation context or a specific file reference. Trigger on requests like "challenge this", "poke holes", "what could go wrong", "play devil's advocate", "linus mode", or "/devils-advocate".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions75 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 75
- talesofai/cohub★ 585same name
- juxt/allium★ 506same name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- Michaelliv/napkin★ 428same name
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 424same name
- nexmoe/eve★ 424same name
- Southclaws/storyden★ 348same name
- 10xChengTu/Mux0★ 337same name
- theexperiencecompany/gaia★ 325same name
- AkaraChen/aghub★ 271same name
65 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- backupSkill
- bootstrap-projectSkill
- code-mapSkill
- doctorSkill
- ingest-projectSkill
- installSkill
- interviewSkill
- metric-watchSkill
- pinSkill
- recallSkill
- rememberSkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- routine-initSkill
- suggestionsSkill
- updateSkill
- wiki-healthSkill
- wiki-migrationSkill
- wrapSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 71 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 72
NEVER part of the scheduled weekly routine.
- Very specific: line 122
Write any wiki file directly — apply_candidates (and, for --seed-tree, the same concept-create machinery /ren:wrap uses) are the only write …
- Very specific: line 127
Run --seed-tree on a schedule — it is manual-trigger only, never folded into the weekly routine.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 71 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
distill
The #60 wiki-distiller (spec 2026-08-18 §3): batch-mine L1 narratives newer than the stored watermark for durable learnings the live wrap gate missed, and land them through the single write door, producer="distiller", capped at WRITE_CAP writes per run.
When to use
/ren:distill— on-demand run (the first backlog-rescue run is this).- The weekly routine (routines/distiller-weekly.md) runs the same flow.
/ren:distill --seed-tree <project>— MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY (spec 2026-08-31 §3 behavior 1). Backfills the concept tree from a project's EXISTINGknowledge/lessons/pages — durable concepts written before concept-tree routing existed, or missed by a session's own wrap gate. This mode is NEVER part of the scheduled weekly routine; it runs only when a friend (or the live session, deliberately) asks for it by name.
Flow
- Batch.
uv run python -c "from skills.distill.lib import l1_batch, read_watermark; import json; print(json.dumps(l1_batch(read_watermark())))"from the framework repo (or the versioned plugin cache withUV_PROJECT_ENVIRONMENTredirected, same as /ren:update's convention). Empty batch → report "watermark caught up", stop. - Dedup context. For each distinct
sessionin the batch, collectlanded_pages(session). - Mine. Spawn ONE
ren-distilleragent (worker-class) with the batch'sescaped_bodytexts and the per-session landed sets. Parse its reply as the candidate JSON array. A malformed reply → stop, report, watermark UNTOUCHED. - Classify. Build one classifier prompt per candidate via
build_classifier_prompt(item, eligible_targets=eligible_update_targets(source_session), project=...)and spawn ONE classifier-class subagent (batched, same pattern as /ren:wrap step 3) returning an index-keyed JSON verdict array. - Apply. Assemble
candidates(lib shape: item/verdict/source_session/project/content=proposed_content/page=None) and callapply_candidates(candidates, run_session="distill-<date>", batch=batch, watermark_before=read_watermark()). Print the returned counts; a non-zerocapped_remainderis reported as "N candidates carried to the next run";duplicates(noop-duplicate replays) is reported separately and never counts against the cap. - Advance the watermark to
result["watermark_after"]— ONLY if steps 3-5 completed without an exception ANDwatermark_afteris notNone. The lib computes it: a fully-processed batch (no remainder) advances to the batch's maxren_ts; a capped run advances only up to (not past) the earliest L1 belonging to a session with unprocessed candidates, so that session's L1s stay behind the watermark and get re-mined next run (spec §3.4, §3.5). ANonewatermark_after with a non-empty remainder means no advance this run — say so on the report screen. Any exception in steps 3-5 leaves the watermark untouched (re-run safe; the journal dedup makes replays idempotent). - Report. One screen: batch size, candidates, applied/held/suggested/gated_out/refused/duplicates, capped remainder, new watermark (or "no advance this run" when
watermark_afterisNone).
--seed-tree <project> flow (Task 7, spec 2026-08-31 §3)
Manual trigger only — see "When to use" above. A single call does the whole
run; there is no separate mine/classify subagent hand-off like the L1 flow
above, because the candidates are already-written lessons, not narrative to
mine, and this mode always has a live llm_call to gate them with.
- Run.
seed_tree(project, llm_call, cap=None)(fromskills.distill.lib). - Internally: loads
projects/<project>/schema.md's taxonomy — a missing or unparseable schema.md refuses the WHOLE run (result["blind"]is set, "no taxonomy — run ingest's taxonomy draft first"; run/ren:ingest-projector hand-seed a taxonomy first). Otherwise it enumeratesprojects/<project>/knowledge/lessons/*.mdnewer than the project's ownseed_tree_watermark(kept separate from the scheduled distiller's watermark), gates each lesson body through the LIVE classifier, and for everykind == "concept"verdict that resolves to a brand-new taxonomy leaf: places it via the SAME concept-create machinery/ren:wrapuses (mints the page, maintains its leaf/parent hubs, additively splicesschema.md), then appends aSee: [[<node>]]pointer to the source lesson. Everything else (already-a-lesson verdicts, non-durable verdicts, an invalid concept placement) is skipped — advancing the watermark past it, since there is nothing to write for a lesson that's already sitting on disk as a lesson. Known limitation: a concept placement that resolves to an ALREADY- EXISTING taxonomy node is also skipped, and the source lesson is left un-annotated (result["existing_node_skipped"], distinct fromresult["gated_out"]'s classifier-noise cases) —--seed-treedoes not accrete onto existing nodes; that machinery is/ren:wrap's own_concept_node_page+ merge path. Backfilling accretion for this mode is future work, not this task's scope. - Report. Same counter shape as the L1 flow (
applied/held/suggested/gated_out/refused/duplicates/capped_remainder), plusannotated(theSee:pointer UPDATEs — these count toward the cap exactly like any other write),existing_node_skipped, andblind.
What this skill does NOT do
- Write any wiki file directly — apply_candidates (and, for
--seed-tree, the same concept-create machinery/ren:wrapuses) are the only write paths. - Advance the watermark on a failed run, or past an unprocessed session's earliest L1 on a capped run.
- Touch quarantine banners, trust stamps, or the backup remote.
- Run
--seed-treeon a schedule — it is manual-trigger only, never folded into the weekly routine.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

