agentleFS
harshith-vaddiparthyharshith-vaddiparthy/finance-skills/skills/revenue-recognition-qa/SKILL.md

revenue-recognition-qa

Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when QAing revenue recognition schedules, deferred revenue, performance obligations, SSP assumptions, contract modifications, and close-period revenue exceptions.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill to review revenue recognition support and surface issues for controller review.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Check core fields: customer, contract ID, performance obligation, start date, end date, total consideration, deferred balance, recognized …

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not provide final accounting conclusions when policy is missing or ambiguous.

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not cite ASC 606 or IFRS 15 as a final answer without matching the user's policy and source facts.

    line 37
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep recommendations review-oriented: flag, reconcile, document, or escalate.

    line 38

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Revenue Recognition QA

Use this skill to review revenue recognition support and surface issues for controller review.

Inputs

  • Revenue schedule or subledger export.
  • Contract/order form terms and performance obligation notes.
  • Billing data, start and end dates, delivery dates, and usage data if relevant.
  • Accounting policy excerpts for recognition method, SSP, materiality, and modifications.

Workflow

  1. Identify the revenue model: ratable subscription, usage-based, services, milestone, hybrid, or other.
  2. Tie revenue schedule inputs back to contract and billing source data.
  3. Check core fields: customer, contract ID, performance obligation, start date, end date, total consideration, deferred balance, recognized amount, and remaining obligation.
  4. Review high-risk areas: nonstandard terms, discounts, credits, cancellations, upgrades, downgrades, renewals, multi-element arrangements, and services bundled with software.
  5. Classify each issue as policy question, data quality issue, schedule math issue, or missing support.

Output

Return:

  • QA summary with pass, pass with notes, blocked, or controller review required.
  • Exception table with issue, source evidence, financial impact, suggested owner, and recommended next step.
  • Close-period risk notes.
  • Questions for controller, auditor, legal, sales, or billing.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide final accounting conclusions when policy is missing or ambiguous.
  • Do not cite ASC 606 or IFRS 15 as a final answer without matching the user's policy and source facts.
  • Keep recommendations review-oriented: flag, reconcile, document, or escalate.
  • Separate revenue recognition issues from cash collection issues.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.