decision-makers-map
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Map the decision-makers and buying committee at a target account. Identifies economic buyers, champions, technical evaluators, and influencers; prioritizes who to engage first; surfaces coverage gaps and multi-thread risk. Leads with a TL;DR (top 3 to engage, biggest gap, single-thread risk), uses compact tables, and flags recently appointed leaders. Identify the account by company domain (preferred) or company name; include deal context, persona priorities, and any hypotheses to test.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- explorium-ai/gtm-skillsedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- explorium-ai/gtm-skills★ 34645% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- llms.txtllms.txt
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
If only a bare token is supplied with no context, ask once for context.
- Distinctive: line 52
Write the exec summary last.
- Very specific: line 120
Use for: prospects with no email and no linkedin_url, ambiguous title matches, or names returned only by events that match-prospects could …
- Very specific: line 127
No native contact data-quality sort.
- Very specific: line 128
No sub-department job-function filter.
- Distinctive: line 129
No CRM-engagement signal in the data surface.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Decision-Makers Map
Map the buying committee at one target account: who matters, what role they play, and who to engage first.
Input
The user supplies via $ARGUMENTS an account identifier plus optional context.
- Account identifier (required), one of:
- Preferred: a company domain (e.g.
acme.com). Resolve viamatch-business. - Fallback: a company name. Resolve via
match-business.
- Preferred: a company domain (e.g.
- Research context (strongly recommended): a free-form description of why this map is being pulled and what decision it supports. Capture as much as is true: deal stage and value, offering in play, recent activity or stalls, who is already engaged, who is missing, competitive pressure, persona priorities (e.g. "security leadership", "VP Engineering and above"), timing constraints, and any working hypothesis to test.
Example phrasings:
- "Map the buying committee at acme.com. Stage 3 deal, $400K ARR, security platform. We talked to the Director of SecOps but the CISO is quiet: find the economic buyer and any procurement blockers."
- "Decision-makers at Globex for a Data Platform pitch. Cold prospecting, no prior engagement. Likely Eng or Data leadership, flag CFO if cost story applies."
- "Renewal in 90 days at initech.com, champion left last quarter. Find the new owner and anyone who could block renewal."
If only a bare token is supplied with no context, ask once for context. If declined, default to general committee mapping for prospecting and state that assumption in the TL;DR.
Workflow
- Anchor on purpose. Read
$ARGUMENTSand restate the research context in 1-2 sentences as the map purpose. Derive: priority personas (3-6 job titles or functions, e.g. CISO, SecOps Director, Procurement Lead, CFO), priorityjob_levelenums (common values:c-suite,vice president,director,manager; full enum has 15 values, consultfetch-entities --all-parametersfor finer seniority), priorityjob_departmentenums (common values includeengineering,marketing,sales,it,operations,finance; full enum has 29 values, consultfetch-entities --all-parametersfor niche departments), and any named hypotheses to test (e.g. "find the economic buyer"). - Resolve the account. Call
match-businesswith the supplied domain or company name.match-businessreturns onlybusiness_id; to get firmographics (company_name, headcount, revenue_range, industry, HQ), callenrich-business --type firmographics --session-id <id> --table-name <match_business_table>immediately after. Capture the newtable_namereturned in the response (a freshview_<hash>); thread THAT new table forward into the next enrich/events/export call, NOT the originalmatch-businesstable. Each enrich call produces a new view table; the original fetch/match table does not get the enrichment columns. If the resolved business_id's firmographics show a major-brand input but the firmo headcount is 1-50 and NAICS is551114(Corporate Managing Offices) or SIC isHotels and motels, the match likely routed to a registered-agent shell entity. Re-try with the alternate domain (.so vs .com) or with the company name string. Do not proceed with the wrong business_id. If no confident match, surface the ambiguity to the user before continuing rather than guessing. - Resolve filter values for the committee search. For every priority job title, call
autocompletewithfield: job_titleand capture the returned strings plus thesession_id. Reuse one session_id across the workflow so downstream calls stay consistent. Intersectjob_titlewithjob_levelenum to tighten - the autocomplete-resolved values are not enforced as exact-match (ajob_title-only filter forVice President of Engineeringreturned 4 of 5 non-VP rows in live testing). Combinejob_titlewithjob_level: {values: ["vice president"]}for tight matches. - Size the committee. The
match-businesscall in step 2 returns a businesses table (capture its name; for exampledm_map_accounts). Callfetch-entities-statistics --entity-type prospects --session-id <sid> --filter '{"business_id": {"values": [<resolved business_ids>]}, "job_title": {...}, "job_level": {...}}'with the priorityjob_titlevalues and the priorityjob_levelenum. Note:fetch-entities-statisticsdoes NOT support--businesses-table-name; that flag only works onfetch-entities. Scope stats withfilters.business_id.valuesdirectly (acompany_domainfilter is not a valid filter field either). Country caveat: when scoping by country,fetch-entities-statisticsdoes NOT strictly enforcecompany_country_code.total_resultsis global; for country-scoped committee counts readstats.business_categories_per_location[<category>][<country>]and sum the requested ISO-2 codes. Capture the total. If the total is very large (above ~500) tighten withjob_departmentor higherjob_level; if very small (under ~10) loosen by adding adjacent titles or droppingjob_level. - Pull the committee broadly (retrieval, not filtering). Call
fetch-entities --entity-type prospects --session-id <sid> --businesses-table-name dm_map_accounts --table-name dm_map_committeewith the same title + level filters plushas_email: trueas a contact-quality proxy. Note:fetch-entitiespreview is hard-capped at 5 rows regardless of--number-of-results. The full slice only materializes viaexport-to-csv(paid). For interactive use, treat the 5-row preview as a sanity sample, not as the ranked top-N. Separately, run a secondfetch-entitiespass (same flags, different priority titles) for adjacent functions named in the context (e.g. Procurement, Legal, Finance) if they were not in the priority titles, so coverage gaps are visible. - Account context signals. In parallel with step 5, call
fetch-businesses-events --session-id <sid> --table-name dm_map_accountsand scope the events filter to the last 90 days.fetch-businesses-eventshas no executive-move or departure enum. Closest signals:employee_joined_company(all hires, undifferentiated by seniority) andhiring_in_<department>_department. For executive-level moves specifically, the data isn't surfaced here - flag this as a gap in the brief. Also triage funding/strategy signals that change the buying dynamic. Optionally callenrich-business --session-id <sid> --table-name dm_map_accounts --enrichments firmographics strategic-insightsto back the Company Snapshot and GTM Fit sections (combine up to 3 enrichments per call); addchallengesandcompetitive-landscapewhen the context names a competitor or a named hypothesis ties to a strategic theme. - Enrich and deep-research the top contacts.
- Merge prospects from step 5, dedupe by
prospect_id. - Rank by seniority (
job_level), fit to priority personas, fit to named hypotheses, and presence ofemail/linkedin_url. - Call
enrich-prospects --session-id <sid> --table-name dm_map_committee --enrichments contacts profiles --contact-types emailon the top 20 merged prospects (CLI batches 50). Cost is ~2 credits per row (email-only) vs ~5 credits per row (email + phone). Switch to--contact-types email phoneonly when phone numbers are required (e.g. SDR dialer flows). For top 3-5 stakeholders, surface their recent activity from the business-sideenrich-business --type linkedin-posts --session-id <sid> --table-name dm_map_accountsinstead (per-prospect linkedin-posts is not exposed).
- Merge prospects from step 5, dedupe by
- Synthesize. Each retrieval is raw context. Decide what makes the map, framed by purpose, priority personas, and named hypotheses.
- Events triage: keep new-hire, executive-move, and promotion signals at director-level and above, especially in the priority personas or adjacent functions. For each newly-named person, run
match-prospectsif not already enriched and add to the committee with a RECENTLY APPOINTED flag and the event date. - Role classification (conservative):
- Champions require explicit engagement evidence (CRM activity, demo attended, prior emails). Title alone is never sufficient; without a signal, place under Influencers > Potential Champions.
- Technical Evaluators are director-and-above in Engineering, IT, or the function being sold to.
- Economic Buyers hold budget: C-Level Finance, the function head sponsoring the deal, or CEO for strategic deals.
- Influencers use named sub-buckets (Procurement, Legal / Compliance, Operations, Adjacent Marketing, HR / Talent, Potential Champions). Skip empty buckets.
- Hypothesis check: explicitly address each named hypothesis: confirmed, contradicted, or unresolved. Surface the answer in the TL;DR.
- Source tagging: tag every contact with source:
[from fetch-entities],[from events],[from match-prospects].
- Events triage: keep new-hire, executive-move, and promotion signals at director-level and above, especially in the priority personas or adjacent functions. For each newly-named person, run
- Write the exec summary last. Re-read the body, then write the TL;DR at the top, framed by the map purpose.
Output Format
Decision-Makers Map: [Company Name]
[linkedin_category or naics_category] | [headcount / company_size] | [revenue_range / company_revenue] | [HQ]
TL;DR
Map purpose: [restate the user's context in one line, or "general committee mapping for prospecting (no context supplied)" if defaulted].
One paragraph framed by the map purpose. Top 3 contacts to engage (named, one-line reasoning each, tied to the purpose), biggest coverage gap (specific role or function with risk), single-thread risk in one sentence, and a one-line answer to each named hypothesis (confirmed / contradicted / unresolved).
Sample preview phrasing for the committee tables: "Sample preview (top 20 of <total> matches from fetch-entities-statistics)."
Company Snapshot
One paragraph: what they do, where they sit, key firmographic and strategic signals.
Account Context
- Deal Status: stage, value, close date, competition (from user context).
- Engaged Stakeholders: who has already been contacted (from user context).
- Key Signals: leadership moves, funding, strategic shifts from
fetch-businesses-eventsandenrich-business. - Open Issues / Blockers: from user context.
Committee Map (tables)
Per category, lead with a 5-column table. Skip empty categories.
Economic Buyers
| Name | Title | Status | Source |
Champions
| Name | Title | Status | Source | |
| (Explicit engagement evidence required. If none: "No Champions identified. See Potential Champions under Influencers.") |
Technical Evaluators
| Name | Title | Status | Source |
Influencers
Group by named sub-bucket (Procurement, Legal / Compliance, Operations, Adjacent Marketing, HR / Talent, Potential Champions). One 5-column table per bucket that has contacts.
Recently Appointed (last 90 days)
| Name | Title | Appointment Date | Status | |
| These also appear in their primary category with a RECENTLY APPOINTED flag. |
Key Stakeholders (top 3-5)
Richer profiles for the deep-researched contacts.
[Name]: [Title]
- Role: Economic Buyer / Champion / Technical Evaluator / Influencer:Sub-bucket
- Background: from
enrich-prospects profiles(career summary, time in role). - Engagement history: prior interactions from user context, or "No prior engagement recorded".
- Why they matter: tied to role and account context.
- Flags:
no email on file,RECENTLY APPOINTED, source disagreements. - Recommended approach: specific to the named hypothesis, current signal, or coverage need.
Engagement Strategy
Specific to this account, not a generic playbook. Anchor each step to a named person and a real signal.
- Immediate priorities (next 2 weeks): top 3 actions, each tied to a specific person and signal.
- Coverage gaps: specific empty persona slots (e.g. "No Finance stakeholder below the CFO; director-level FP&A search recommended").
- Sequencing: ordered outreach with named people and reasons.
- Single-thread risk: current dependencies and the moves to fix them.
Excluded / Needs Verification
| Name | Reason | Recommended Action |
Use for: prospects with no email and no linkedin_url, ambiguous title matches, or names returned only by events that match-prospects could not resolve. Do not include in the main map. |
Next Steps
Concrete next actions, each referencing a specific person, persona gap, hypothesis, or signal surfaced above, and tied to the map purpose.
Limitations
strategic-insightsandchallengesenrichments are sourced from SEC 10-K filings; for private companies these will be all-null, and for public companies the data can be 12-18 months stale. Usefetch-businesses-events,funding-and-acquisitions,workforce-trends, andlinkedin-postsfor current-state signals.- No native contact data-quality sort. Use
has_email: trueas a proxy for reachable contacts. - No sub-department job-function filter. Combine
job_titleautocomplete +job_departmentto approximate functions like "FP&A" or "SecOps". - No CRM-engagement signal in the data surface. Champion designation depends on engagement evidence supplied in the user context; without it, default to Potential Champions under Influencers.
- Bucket-only company size and revenue. Use
company_sizeandcompany_revenuebuckets when describing the account snapshot. job_departmentis null for many cross-functional senior roles (Chief X Officer, President, Founder). Group these under "Unattributed" in any By-Department breakdown rather than dropping them.- Map raw
prospect_job_seniority_levelvalues to canonical filter values for display:cxo->c-suite,vp->vice president. Use the canonical value when describing seniority in committee categories.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

