update-flag-targeting
Skill127 starsChanged 30 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Change how a Harness FME feature flag serves traffic in environments. Covers percentage rollout, individual targets, targeting rules (attribute/segment/flag-dependency), defaultTreatment, trafficAllocation, treatments, kill/restore, and copying or initializing a definition in an environment. Use when asked to ramp a flag, add rules/users, change allocation, kill/restore, or promote config. Not for creating flags (create-feature-flag), metadata like tags/owners/archive (manage-flag-lifecycle), segment keys (manage-segments), pipeline rollouts (fme-pipeline), or flag analysis (explain-flag). Trigger phrases: update targeting, ramp flag, percentage rollout, add rule, add users, kill flag, restore, copy config.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/harness.mdcCursor rule
- manage-rolesSkill
- manage-usersSkill
- create-agentSkill
- create-agent-templateSkill
- dbops-changesetSkill
- choose-metricSkill
- cleanup-feature-flagsSkill
- create-experimentSkill
- create-feature-flagSkill
- create-metricSkill
- discover-feature-flagsSkill
- explain-flagSkill
- feature-flag-onboardingSkill
- fme-pipelineSkill
- instrument-feature-flagSkill
- instrument-metricSkill
- manage-experimentsSkill
- manage-flag-lifecycleSkill
- manage-segmentsSkill
- review-experiment-resultsSkill
- create-connectorSkill
- create-environmentSkill
- create-infrastructureSkill
- create-secretSkill
- create-serviceSkill
- ai-operationsSkill
- analyze-costsSkill
- audit-reportSkill
- chaos-code-risk-scanSkill
- chaos-dr-testSkill
- chaos-experimentSkill
- create-policySkill
- deployment-readinessSkill
- dora-metricsSkill
- gitops-statusSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- manage-idpSkill
- manage-slosSkill
- optimize-pipelineSkill
- pr-analysisSkill
- scorecard-reviewSkill
- security-reportSkill
- sei-analyticsSkill
- template-usageSkill
- create-pipelineSkill
- create-pipeline-v1Skill
- create-templateSkill
- create-triggerSkill
- debug-pipelineSkill
- manage-freeze-windowsSkill
- migrate-pipelineSkill
- run-pipelineSkill
- create-sbomSkill
- enforce-sbomSkill
- manage-artifactsSkill
- manage-cdeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 52
Follow scope-establishment.md.
- Distinctive: line 56
Ask only for what's missing:
- Distinctive: line 77
Run these checks before composing the plan.
- Very specific: line 111
Follow write-safety.md for the protocol (present plan → STOP → explicit confirmation → execute non-prod first → production).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Update Flag Targeting
Change how an existing Harness FME feature flag serves traffic in one or more environments. Always read the current definition first, then merge-patch only what changes. Show a diff of just what changed and use plain-language before/after to describe who gets what.
Related: Segment membership changes are /manage-segments; deep flag analysis (impact, dependencies, single-flag state) is /explain-flag. Reverse-lookup scans (dependents, segment usage) are in tool-map.md.
Tools
Works through the Harness MCP server or the Harness CLI; names are from tool-map.md.
| Operation | MCP | CLI |
| List environments | harness_list · fme_environment · compact: false | harness list fme_environment --json |
| List flag definitions | harness_list · fme_feature_flag_definition · params: { feature_flag_name } · filters: { offset: 0, limit: 100 } · compact: false | harness list feature_flag:definition <flag> --json |
| Get definition | harness_get · fme_feature_flag_definition · params: { feature_flag_name, environment_id } | harness get feature_flag:definition <flag> --env <env-id> --json |
| Get parent flag definition | harness_get · fme_feature_flag_definition · params: { feature_flag_name: <parent>, environment_id } | harness get feature_flag:definition <parent> --env <env-id> --json |
| Update definition | harness_update · fme_feature_flag_definition · params: { feature_flag_name, environment_id } · body: { <fields>, comment, title? } | harness update feature_flag:definition <flag> --env <env-id> -f patch.json --json (include comment/supported title in the file) |
| Create definition | harness_create · fme_feature_flag_definition · params: { feature_flag_name, environment_id } · body: { treatments, defaultTreatment, defaultRule, rules?, baselineTreatment?, trafficAllocation?, comment? } | harness create feature_flag:definition <flag> --env <env-id> -f def.json |
| Kill flag | harness_execute · fme_feature_flag · action="kill" · params: { feature_flag_name, environment_id } · body: { comment?, title? }? | harness execute feature_flag:kill <flag> --env <env-id> --comment <text> |
| Restore flag | harness_execute · fme_feature_flag · action="restore" · params: { feature_flag_name, environment_id } · body: { comment?, title? }? | harness execute feature_flag:restore <flag> --env <env-id> --comment <text> |
| Get segment metadata (all types) | harness_get · fme_segment · params: { segment_name, segment_type } | harness get segment <segment> --segment-type <type> --json |
| Get STANDARD segment definition | harness_get · fme_segment_definition · params: { segment_name, environment_id } | harness get segment:definition <segment> --env <env-id> --json |
| List experiments | harness_list · fme_experiment · filters: { parent_type: "FEATURE_FLAG", parent_name, environment_id, status: ["ACTIVE", "PAUSED"], offset: 0, limit: 100 } (apply pagination completeness checks) · compact: false | harness list experiment --parent-type FEATURE_FLAG --parent-name <flag> --env <env-id> --status ACTIVE --json, then again with --status PAUSED |
Instructions
See concepts.md for FME evaluation order, killed state, treatments vs control, and round-tripping shapes. See write-safety.md for the confirm-before-write protocol; this skill links to it and does not duplicate it.
Phase 1: Establish scope
Follow scope-establishment.md. Ask for org_id and project_id if not already known. Restate: Working in org=..., project=...
Phase 2: Gather intent
Ask only for what's missing:
- Flag name (case-sensitive identifier)
- Target environments (names or IDs, or "all")
- What to change (map the user's request to one or more operations in the table below)
Phase 3: Read current state
Always fully paginate List flag definitions for the flag before planning changes in the target environments: explicitly set MCP filters.limit: 100, advance filters.offset, and stop only on a short page. size is ignored for this list. Incomplete inventory is not evidence a definition is missing; stop rather than initialize from a first-page miss. Follow pagination for environment and experiment lookups too. Never compose rules, targets, or matchers from memory — copy shapes from the live definition or another flag in the project that already uses that shape. If no example exists, warn that the shape is unverified, try it in a non-production env first, and let the API's 400 messages guide you (see schema-validation-loop.md).
Note per environment from the definition:
isKilled(boolean),defaultTreatment,treatments(case-sensitive; read them, don't guess)defaultRule(array of{treatment, size}summing to 100)rules(array, replaced whole on update)trafficAllocation(0-100; keys outside it getdefaultTreatment)- individual targets and segment references (shapes undocumented; round-trip them)
impressions.lastImpressionAt(usage signal;null= never received traffic; absent = unknown)
List environments to resolve names to IDs and note isProduction.
Phase 4: Safety checks (before planning)
Run these checks before composing the plan. Stop at the first failure and report it to the user.
| Check | How | What to report |
| Experiment | List experiments for the flag (and environment), filtering to ACTIVE and PAUSED. Apply the experiment check protocol | ACTIVE: explicit acknowledgement required; PAUSED: warn + acknowledgement; COMPLETED: ignore |
| Segment reference | For every new/changed rule matcher or treatment membership, resolve STANDARD/LARGE/RULE_BASED metadata and verify the target-env definition through that type's workflow. The listed definition endpoint is STANDARD-only | Distinguish confirmed missing from unverified because the current tool lacks the operation. Stop the dependent write until verified; never use a STANDARD lookup for LARGE/RULE_BASED or silently switch to legacy scope |
| Flag dependency (IN_SPLIT) | For each depends: {splitName, treatment} in a new or updated rule, Get parent flag definition and verify the treatment exists in treatments | "Flag <parent> has no definition (or treatment <treatment> doesn't exist) in <env>." |
| Treatment reference | Every treatment in rules, defaultRule, individual targets, and defaultTreatment must exist in the treatments array | "Treatment <treatment> not found. Add it to treatments first." |
| Bucket sum | The size fields across all {treatment, size} buckets in defaultRule or a rule must sum to 100 | "Bucket sizes sum to <sum>, not 100. Fix the treatment allocation." |
| Killed flag | Write/read back approved targeting while killed, then separately confirm restore and re-run the experiment check. Inspect the entire patch first: changing defaultTreatment, removing/renaming it, or changing its configuration affects killed traffic immediately | Name the current served treatment/config and any immediate change. Only promise unchanged traffic if that pair remains unchanged; never restore stale targeting first |
Phase 5: Plan the change
Based on the user's intent and current state, compose the updated definition. See targeting-recipes.md for per-operation shape details.
Map user intent to operations:
| User wants | Recipe | Fields to update |
| Percentage rollout / ramp | (a) | Change defaultRule buckets, or a specific rule's buckets |
| Ramp one rule | (b) | Copy full rules array, change that rule's buckets |
| Add/edit/remove/reorder targeting rules | (c) | Replace full rules array |
| Add/remove individual targets | (d) | Round-trip the individual-targets structure |
| Change defaultTreatment | (e) | Update defaultTreatment |
| Change trafficAllocation | (f) | Update trafficAllocation (0-100) |
| Add/rename treatment or edit configurations | (g) | Replace full treatments array; update all references |
| Copy one env's definition to another | (h) | Copy create/update body fields; check segments and IN_SPLIT parents exist |
| Initialize a definition where none exists | (i) | Create with safe default: flag's treatments (or on/off), everyone off, no rules |
| Kill / restore | (j) | Emergency path: Kill flag or Restore flag |
Show a diff of just the fields that changed and state the before/after in plain language per environment. For non-production first, then production. For production environments, say: "This changes live production traffic in <env>."
Phase 6: Confirm and execute
Follow write-safety.md for the protocol (present plan → STOP → explicit confirmation → execute non-prod first → production). Comment format: "update-flag-targeting: <what> — <why>", e.g. "update-flag-targeting: ramp new-checkout to 25% in staging — FME-123".
On errors: 400 (read API error, fix field, retry once per schema-validation-loop.md); 404 (re-check identifiers, never create to fill); 409 (report as-is, stop).
Phase 7: Verify and restate
Re-read each changed environment's definition, then describe the live behavior in the same plain-language form. If it doesn't match the plan, stop.
Summarize per operation-summary.md: operation, environments changed, before/after, what was confirmed, verification, risks, UI link.
Examples
- "Ramp new-checkout to 10% in staging" — (a) Percentage rollout.
- "Add a targeting rule for beta users in production" — (c) Add targeting rule.
- "Add user-key-123 to the on treatment" — (d) Add individual targets.
- "Kill the flag in production" — (j) Kill (emergency path).
- "Copy staging config to production" — (h) Copy env to env.
- "Set up the flag in qa, it has no definition there" — (i) Initialize safe default.
Performance Notes
- One fully paginated List flag definitions inventory covers the flag's environments; it can require multiple requests. Never equate a page with the complete inventory.
- Merge-patch update: omit a field to leave it unchanged.
treatments,rules, anddefaultRulecan't benulland are replaced whole, so always send the complete array. - Large multi-env changes: run non-production envs first to verify the shape works before touching production.
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Fix |
| 400: buckets don't sum to 100 | Bucket size fields across {treatment, size} in defaultRule or a rule must sum to 100 | Adjust the sizes to sum to 100 |
| 400: unknown treatment | A rule, defaultRule, or defaultTreatment references a treatment not in the treatments array | Add the treatment to treatments first, or fix the reference |
| Targeting changed but traffic is unchanged | The flag is killed | Verify the approved targeting while it remains killed, re-check experiments, then obtain explicit approval before restoring. Never restore stale targeting first |
| 409 governance/approval | OPA policy blocked the write or turned it into a pending approval | Report the response as-is. Never retry around it or try another route. |
| Concurrent edit detected | Another user or process modified the definition between your read and write | Stop and re-plan from the new state |
Generic errors: see tool-map.md.
References
- targeting-recipes.md — per-operation shape details
- concepts.md — FME evaluation order, treatments, killed state
- tool-map.md — tool names, params, common errors
- write-safety.md — confirm-before-write protocol, experiment check
- scope-establishment.md — org/project scope rules
- schema-validation-loop.md — validation error recovery
- operation-summary.md — structured completion summary
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

