agentleFS
hamzzaqureshihamzzaqureshi/gravidex/.agents/skills/quality-engineering/SKILL.md

quality-engineering

Skill1 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Empirical quality assurance, automated testing, and verification discipline for AI coding agents. Enforces test-driven development (TDD) with 80%+ coverage, Playwright E2E automation, formal evaluation harnesses, pre-completion verification checklists, delivery gates, and documentation grounding. Use when writing tests, verifying bug fixes, or running pre-completion gates.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write tests first (RED). Run tests to verify failure.

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    Use Playwright Page Object Model for critical user journeys.

    line 35

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Quality Engineering

Consolidated capability for empirical test-driven development, automated end-to-end verification, eval harnesses, and rigorous completion gates.

When to Activate

  • Authoring unit, integration, or E2E tests before or alongside code changes.
  • Enforcing test-driven development (RED -> GREEN -> REFACTOR) with 80%+ test coverage.
  • Building or running Playwright end-to-end test suites with Page Object Model.
  • Executing pre-completion verification checklists before declaring tasks finished.
  • Enforcing mechanical delivery gates against hallucinated task completion.

When NOT to Activate

  • Pure UI design review (use interface-design).
  • Codebase vulnerability or penetration audits (use security-audit).

Core Execution Workflow

  1. Test-Driven Development (TDD):
    • Write tests first (RED). Run tests to verify failure. Implement minimal code to pass (GREEN). Refactor cleanly.
    • Enforce Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) test structure and descriptive test naming.
    • Consult references/test-driven-development.md.
  2. End-to-End Testing & Evals:
    • Use Playwright Page Object Model for critical user journeys.
    • Formulate eval harnesses for agent tasks with clear scoring rubrics.
    • Consult references/playwright-e2e-testing.md and references/eval-driven-development.md.
  3. Empirical Grounding & Completion Gates:
    • Zero hallucinated completion: never declare work done without executing real tests on disk and verifying exit code 0.
    • Consult references/empirical-verification-rigor.md and references/pre-completion-verification.md.

Modular Reference Directory

Reference ModulePrimary FocusSource Provenance
test-driven-development.mdTDD workflow, AAA structure, test isolation, 80%+ coverageaffaan-m/ECC (tdd-workflow)
playwright-e2e-testing.mdPlaywright E2E patterns, Page Object Model, CI/CD integrationaffaan-m/ECC (e2e-testing)
eval-driven-development.mdFormal evaluation harness, benchmark suites, agent testingaffaan-m/ECC (eval-harness)
empirical-verification-rigor.mdDocumentation grounding, verifiable task ledgers, exit code proofhamzzaqureshi/gravidex (rigor)
pre-completion-verification.mdComprehensive pre-completion checklist, sanity gatesaffaan-m/ECC (verification-loop)
delivery-gate-enforcement.mdMechanical stop hook preventing premature completionaffaan-m/ECC (delivery-gate)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.