ai-strategy-report
Skill40 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate comprehensive AI strategy reports (15+ slides) in PowerPoint format. Analyzes company's digital readiness, identifies high-value AI use cases, creates implementation roadmaps, and provides ROI projections. Designed for consulting firm quality deliverables.
In this repository48 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apa-arrangementSkill
- archimateSkill
- architectureSkill
- audit-report-draftSkill
- audit-risk-assessmentSkill
- audit-substantive-proceduresSkill
- beps-pillar-two-assessmentSkill
- bpmnSkill
- commercial-due-diligenceSkill
- compliance-investigation-designSkill
- consulting-proposal-advisorSkill
- cross-border-investment-taxSkill
- customs-and-trade-complianceSkill
- data-analytics-anomaly-detectionSkill
- deal-structure-tax-optimizationSkill
- debt-restructuringSkill
- digital-strategySkill
- equity-incentive-taxSkill
- esg-assurance-preparationSkill
- excise-and-other-indirect-taxesSkill
- executive-compensation-taxSkill
- expatriate-tax-planningSkill
- fraud-risk-assessmentSkill
- goal-definitionSkill
- group-audit-strategySkill
- infocardSkill
- internal-audit-annual-planSkill
- internal-audit-executionSkill
- itgc-testingSkill
- ma-tax-due-diligenceSkill
- meeting-intelligenceSkill
- mindmapSkill
- office-document-editorSkill
- pdf-managementSkill
- post-merger-integrationSkill
- post-merger-tax-integrationSkill
- presentation-builderSkill
- sox-compliance-checklistSkill
- tax-compliance-calendarSkill
- tax-digital-transformationSkill
- tax-dispute-responseSkill
- tax-incentive-applicationSkill
- tax-risk-management-frameworkSkill
- tp-documentation-preparationSkill
- valuation-and-pricingSkill
- vat-compliance-optimizationSkill
- walkthrough-and-control-testingSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈16
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 123
Create a 2×2 matrix categorizing opportunities:
- Very specific: line 136
Call generate_ppt_from_skill tool with structured slide content:
- Very specific: line 166
If user needs editable data, call save_json:
- Distinctive: line 185
When to Call: After content generation is complete, always call this tool to create the deliverable.
- Distinctive: line 206
Use action-oriented titles ("Drive Efficiency Through AI-Powered Quality Control")
- Distinctive: line 208
Keep bullet points concise (1-2 lines each)
- Distinctive: line 209
Use color coding: 🔴 High Risk, 🟡 Medium Risk, 🟢 Low Risk
- Distinctive: line 215
When to Call: When user explicitly asks for editable data or mentions integrating with other systems.
- Distinctive: line 237
Specificity: All recommendations must be specific to the company's industry and stated challenges
- Distinctive: line 239
Feasibility: Only recommend AI use cases that match the described data availability
- Distinctive: line 240
Actionability: Every recommendation must have clear next steps
- Distinctive: line 274
Do NOT specify specific vendors (e.g., "use AWS SageMaker")
- Distinctive: line 275
Do NOT make unrealistic claims (e.g., "100% automation")
- Distinctive: line 276
Do NOT ignore stated constraints (e.g., data privacy requirements)
- Distinctive: line 277
Do NOT provide implementation details beyond strategic level
- Distinctive: line 287
Encourage detailed input: If user input is vague, ask clarifying questions
- Distinctive: line 289
Highlight risks explicitly: Don't hide implementation challenges
- Distinctive: line 369
Every AI use case must be described as an investment case:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI Strategy Report
Overview
AI Strategy Report is a comprehensive strategic document that analyzes a company's AI readiness, identifies high-value use cases, and creates a practical implementation roadmap. This skill generates professional-grade PowerPoint presentations of 15+ slides using the KPMG consulting template for consistent, professional formatting.
Key Features:
- Complete strategic framework: 15-slide structure covering the full AI transformation journey
- Data-driven analysis: Digital maturity assessment and data readiness evaluation
- Prioritization matrix: 2×2 value-feasibility matrix for AI opportunities
- Implementation roadmap: 3-phase timeline (0-6m/6-18m/18-36m)
- Financial projections: Investment breakdown and ROI calculations
- Risk assessment: Technical, organizational, and compliance risks with mitigations
Output Format: PowerPoint (.pptx) with professional styling and structured content.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Developing AI transformation strategy for enterprises
- Evaluating AI opportunities and prioritizing use cases
- Creating implementation roadmaps for digital transformation
- Building business cases for AI investments
- Assessing organizational readiness for AI adoption
- Planning talent and capability building for AI teams
- Preparing board-level presentations on AI strategy
- Supporting M&A due diligence for AI capabilities
- Planning cloud migration and data infrastructure
- Creating vendor selection criteria for AI platforms
Report Structure (15 Slides)
Slide 1: Cover Page
Slide 2: Executive Summary
Slide 3-4: Current State Assessment
Slide 5-6: AI Opportunity Map (2×2 Matrix)
Slide 7-9: Top 3 Use Cases Deep Dive
Slide 10-11: Implementation Roadmap (3 Phases)
Slide 12: Investment & ROI Analysis
Slide 13: Organizational Capabilities
Slide 14: Risk Assessment & Mitigation
Slide 15: Next Steps & Action ItemsInput Requirements
Required Information
**Company Basics**
- Company Name: [Name]
- Industry: [Industry Sector]
- Company Size: [Employees] / [Revenue]
- Digital Maturity: [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced]
**Business Context**
- Core Business: [Description]
- Key Challenges: [List 2-3 major pain points]
- AI Objectives: [What problems to solve with AI]
**Strategic Priorities** (Select all that apply)
- [ ] Cost Reduction & Efficiency
- [ ] Revenue Growth
- [ ] Customer Experience
- [ ] Innovation & New Products
- [ ] Risk ManagementOptional Information
**Data Assets**
- Existing data types: [Customer/Operational/IoT/etc]
- Data history: [Years of historical data]
**Technology Stack**
- Cloud platform: [AWS/Azure/GCP/Alibaba/etc]
- Existing systems: [ERP/CRM/MES/etc]
**Constraints**
- Budget range: [Amount]
- Timeline: [Expected delivery]
- Special restrictions: [Data privacy/etc]Workflow
Phase 1: Analysis (Internal)
Analyze the input information and determine:
- Digital maturity level based on described systems and processes
- Data readiness for each potential AI use case
- Priority ranking of AI opportunities (value × feasibility)
- Implementation complexity for each phase
Phase 2: Content Generation
Generate structured content for each slide:
Slide 2 - Executive Summary:
- 3-5 key conclusions
- Investment overview
- Expected ROI
- Critical milestones
Slide 5-6 - AI Opportunity Map: Create a 2×2 matrix categorizing opportunities:
- Quick Wins (High Value, High Feasibility): Immediate start
- Strategic Bets (High Value, Low Feasibility): Long-term planning
- Low Priority (Low Value): Defer or discard
Slide 10-11 - Roadmap: Define 3 phases:
- Phase 1 (0-6 months): Foundation + Pilot
- Phase 2 (6-18 months): Scale + Capability Building
- Phase 3 (18-36 months): Optimization + Innovation
Phase 3: Tool Execution
Call generate_ppt_from_skill tool with structured slide content:
{
"skill_name": "ai-strategy-report",
"title": "[Company] AI Strategy Report",
"subtitle": "Digital Transformation Roadmap",
"slides": [
{
"type": "title",
"title": "Cover Title",
"content": "Subtitle"
},
{
"type": "content",
"title": "Slide Title",
"content": "Bullet points and analysis"
},
{
"type": "two_column",
"title": "Comparison Slide",
"left_content": "Current State",
"right_content": "Future State"
}
]
}Phase 4: Optional Data Export
If user needs editable data, call save_json:
{
"filename": "[Company]_AI_Strategy_Data",
"data": {
"scenarios": [...],
"roadmap": {...},
"financial": {...}
}
}Tool Configuration
Tool 1: generate_ppt_from_skill
Purpose: Generate PowerPoint using the KPMG template bundled with this skill
When to Call: After content generation is complete, always call this tool to create the deliverable.
Parameters:
{
"skill_name": "ai-strategy-report",
"title": "Company AI Strategy Report",
"subtitle": "Digital Transformation Roadmap (2024-2027)",
"slides": [
{
"type": "title|content|two_column",
"title": "Action-oriented title (verb-first)",
"content": "Markdown formatted content with bullet points",
"left_content": "For two-column layout",
"right_content": "For two-column layout"
}
]
}Content Guidelines:
- Use action-oriented titles ("Drive Efficiency Through AI-Powered Quality Control")
- Format with Markdown:
- Bullet points,**Bold highlights** - Keep bullet points concise (1-2 lines each)
- Use color coding: 🔴 High Risk, 🟡 Medium Risk, 🟢 Low Risk
Tool 2: save_json (Optional)
Purpose: Export structured data for further editing or integration
When to Call: When user explicitly asks for editable data or mentions integrating with other systems.
Parameters:
{
"filename": "Company_AI_Strategy_Data",
"data": {
"company": "Company Name",
"industry": "Industry Sector",
"scenarios": [...],
"roadmap": {...},
"financial": {...},
"organization": {...},
"risks": [...]
}
}Quality Standards
Content Requirements
- Specificity: All recommendations must be specific to the company's industry and stated challenges
- Quantification: Include estimated savings/returns where possible (mark as "estimated" if not precise)
- Feasibility: Only recommend AI use cases that match the described data availability
- Actionability: Every recommendation must have clear next steps
Slide Content Standards
Executive Summary (Slide 2):
- Max 5 conclusions
- Include 1-line ROI summary
- List 3 critical milestones
Opportunity Map (Slide 5-6):
- Minimum 4 opportunities mapped
- Clear rationale for each quadrant placement
- Prioritization within each quadrant
Use Case Deep Dive (Slide 7-9): For each of top 3 use cases:
- Business pain point (2-3 sentences)
- AI solution approach (high-level)
- Quantified expected benefit
- Implementation complexity rating
Roadmap (Slide 10-11):
- Each phase has clear deliverables
- Logical dependencies between phases
- Resource requirements specified
ROI Analysis (Slide 12):
- 3-year investment breakdown
- Year-by-year savings projection
- Payback period calculation
- Key assumptions listed
Prohibited Content
- Do NOT specify specific vendors (e.g., "use AWS SageMaker")
- Do NOT make unrealistic claims (e.g., "100% automation")
- Do NOT ignore stated constraints (e.g., data privacy requirements)
- Do NOT provide implementation details beyond strategic level
Example Output
See examples/manufacturing_example.md for a complete input-output example.
Best Practices
For High-Quality Output
- Encourage detailed input: If user input is vague, ask clarifying questions
- Be conservative with estimates: Better to under-promise than over-promise
- Highlight risks explicitly: Don't hide implementation challenges
- Emphasize data readiness: Make clear when data preparation is needed
- Provide alternatives: Offer options when ideal path isn't feasible
Industry Customization
Manufacturing:
- Focus: Predictive maintenance, quality control, supply chain
- Key metrics: OEE, defect rates, inventory turnover
Retail/E-commerce:
- Focus: Demand forecasting, personalization, pricing
- Key metrics: Conversion rate, customer LTV, inventory accuracy
Financial Services:
- Focus: Risk modeling, fraud detection, customer service
- Key metrics: False positive rate, processing time, compliance score
Healthcare:
- Focus: Diagnostic imaging, patient triage, resource optimization
- Key metrics: Diagnostic accuracy, wait times, resource utilization
Dependencies
Required Backend Tools
generate_ppt- python-pptx 1.0.2save_json- Python built-in json
System Requirements
- AriaAI Backend >= 1.0.0
- Function Calling support enabled
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
| 1.0.0 | 2024-03-25 | Initial release |
Maintenance
- Maintainer: AriaAI Team
- Update Cycle: Quarterly review
- Feedback: Submit via Issue or contact admin
Capability Upgrade
Mode Selection
- Quick: 输出 AI 机会清单、优先级和 90 天试点建议。
- Standard: 输出完整 AI 战略报告、用例组合、路线图、投资和组织能力建议。
- Deep: 结合客户行业、数据资产、系统架构、组织成熟度、知识库案例和历史项目记忆,形成董事会级 AI 转型方案。
AI Portfolio Logic
每个 AI 用例必须同时评估:业务价值、数据可得性、技术可行性、组织准备度、风险合规、落地周期和可复制性。优先级不能只按“看起来先进”排序。
Quality Gates
- AI 用例与客户业务痛点和数据资产匹配。
- 投资收益有假设、区间和验证方式。
- 路线图区分数据基础、模型能力、业务流程和组织变革。
- 风险覆盖数据隐私、模型准确性、合规、采纳和运维。
- PPT 输出前已有清晰 storyline,不直接堆幻灯片。
Consulting Excellence Layer
AI Value Pool Logic
AI strategy must quantify value pools before listing use cases. Organize value into:
| Value Pool | Typical Levers | Evidence Needed |
| Revenue growth | Conversion, pricing, cross-sell, retention | Funnel, customer, sales data |
| Cost reduction | Automation, workload reduction, rework reduction | Process volume, FTE, cycle time |
| Risk control | Fraud, compliance, quality, safety | Incidents, exceptions, loss data |
| Decision quality | Forecasting, planning, prioritization | Historical decisions and outcomes |
| Knowledge leverage | Proposal reuse, case retrieval, expert assistance | Document corpus and usage patterns |
Use Case Investment Committee
Every AI use case must be described as an investment case:
- Business problem.
- User and workflow.
- Data required.
- Model approach.
- Integration point.
- Human review point.
- Benefit hypothesis.
- Risk and control.
- Pilot metric.
- Scale condition.
Build / Buy / Partner Decision
| Condition | Recommended Path |
| Commodity capability, low differentiation | Buy SaaS or API |
| Proprietary data and workflow advantage | Build on internal data |
| Need speed plus domain expertise | Partner / co-build |
| High compliance or sensitive data | Private deployment or controlled harness |
AI Governance Minimum
Deep AI strategy must include:
- Model ownership and approval.
- Data access and permission rules.
- Prompt and output review policy.
- Evaluation metrics and regression testing.
- Incident response and rollback.
- Human-in-the-loop points.
- Vendor and cost governance.
Pilot Design Standard
Each pilot must be small enough to run in 8-12 weeks and strong enough to prove business value. Define baseline, target, sample users, process integration, evaluation method, and scale/no-scale decision gate.
Deliverable Catalog
| Deliverable | When to use | Minimum content | Format |
| AI readiness assessment | 判断企业是否适合推进 AI | 数据、流程、系统、人才、治理、风险成熟度 | Markdown / PPT |
| AI value pool map | 寻找高价值机会 | 收入、成本、风险、决策、知识价值池和证据 | PPT / Excel |
| AI use-case portfolio | 选择 AI 场景 | 用例、用户、数据、模型、价值、风险、优先级 | Excel / PPT |
| Pilot charter | 启动试点 | 目标、范围、用户、数据、指标、时间、评估方式 | Markdown / Word |
| Data readiness checklist | 试点前准备 | 数据源、权限、质量、历史长度、敏感等级、缺口 | Markdown / Excel |
| AI governance framework | 管理模型风险 | 角色、审批、评估、HITL、回滚、供应商和成本治理 | Word / PPT |
| AI transformation roadmap | 进入规模化建设 | 阶段、能力、平台、流程、组织、投资、KPI | PPT |
| Board AI strategy deck | 董事会或高管汇报 | AI 战略命题、用例组合、投资收益、治理风险、90 天行动 | PPT |
Diagnostic Intake
先确认行业、决策问题、现状资料、读者、预算/人力约束和交付日期。 页数与格式沿用用户要求;默认结构只能用于未指定的场景。 对每个 AI 场景确认业务负责人、可获得的数据、权限和质量基线。 缺少成本或收益依据时,输出假设范围和敏感性分析,不承诺 ROI。 区分试点指标、规模化条件和停止条件,并为关键数字记录来源日期。 验收时检查建议是否可以由负责人执行、衡量和复盘。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

