cold-email-fundamentals
Skill181 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write one cold email that gets a reply. Use when the user asks for a cold email, first-touch outreach, or an intro email to a prospect they have not spoken to. Not for sequences, follow-ups, or warm replies.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
No greeting filler. No "I hope this finds you well." Start with the observation.
- Distinctive: line 25
No adjectives about yourself or your product.
- Distinctive: line 26
No links in the first email.
- Distinctive: line 27
No calendar link. The ask is a question, not a booking.
- Distinctive: line 31
Write at an eighth-grade reading level.
- Distinctive: line 38
Check: Could this exact email be sent to anyone else?
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cold Email Fundamentals
One email. Three beats. Under 80 words. The reader decides in four seconds whether this is about them or about you. Make it about them.
The three beats
- Observation. One specific thing about their company or role that is true today and that a stranger could not have pasted from a template. A hire, a launch, a job post, a pricing change, a quote they gave. Name it in one sentence. No "I noticed" or "I came across" — just state it.
- Relevance. One sentence connecting that observation to a problem people in their seat have. Not your product. The problem.
- Ask. One low-friction question they can answer with one word. Not "Do you have 30 minutes?" — "Is this on your plate this quarter?" or "Worth a look?"
Optional fourth line: one line of proof, only if it is a number or a name they would recognize. If you are not sure, cut it.
Rules
- Under 80 words. Count them.
- No greeting filler. No "I hope this finds you well." Start with the observation.
- No adjectives about yourself or your product. "Leading", "innovative", "seamless" — delete.
- No links in the first email. Links read as spam and kill deliverability.
- No calendar link. The ask is a question, not a booking.
- One idea. If you have two angles, write two emails and send one.
- Subject line: 2–5 words, lowercase, references the observation. It should look like an internal email. Examples:
the 3 new AE roles,re: pricing page change,your SaaStr talk. - Sign with first name and company. No title block, no logo, no quote.
- Write at an eighth-grade reading level. Short words beat long ones.
Process
- Ask the user for the observation if they did not give one. Do not invent facts about a real company. If they have none, help them find one: recent hires (job boards), funding (press), product changes (changelog, pricing page), executive moves (press release), customer reviews (G2, app stores).
- Identify the persona and the problem that persona owns. An SDR manager owns pipeline per rep; a VP Eng owns shipping velocity; a CFO owns cash and forecast accuracy.
- Draft the three beats. Then cut every word that does not earn its place.
- Check: Could this exact email be sent to anyone else? If yes, the observation is not specific enough. Start over.
- Return the subject line and the email. Then one line explaining the angle so the user can adjust it.
Output format
Subject: <2–5 words>
<Observation.>
<Relevance.>
<Ask?>
<First name>
<Company>Then: Angle: <one sentence>
Example
Subject: the 4 SDR roles
You opened four SDR roles in Austin last week after closing the Series B. Teams that ramp a cohort that size usually lose the first two months to account research instead of calls. Is ramp time something you are measuring this quarter?
Caleb GTM Skills
Angle: hiring spike → ramp time → research burden.
See references/examples.md for twelve more, by industry.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- public/llms.txtllms.txt
- hemingway-tonalitySkill
- meddic-discovery-liteSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

