tldr
Skill0 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub
Plain-English recap for a reader who has lost the thread — what happened, whether anything is wrong, and exactly what is needed from them, with no jargon. Use when the user says "tldr", "I'm lost", "in layman's terms", "plain English", "what just happened", "what do you need from me", or seems overwhelmed by a long or technical reply.
40 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- annatomka/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zazencodes/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MarkPhamm/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nirberko/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- richkuo/rk-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LaansDole/my-hermes-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use explain, handoff and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
sunnyclinches44Skillexplain
Explains code using real-world analogies and ASCII diagrams
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 6 projects that use this
Google CloudSkilltriage
Gather context on a change or bug and plan the implementation.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions40 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 40
- earlyaidopters/second-brain★ 193same name
- saksham10arora-dotcom/everything-claude-codex★ 74same name
- richkuo/rk-skills★ 50same name
- gsarig/skills★ 30same name
- peterpme/skills★ 28same name
- Vesely/skills★ 28same name
- nirberko/skills★ 19same name
- r13i/skills★ 17same name
- SurefireStudios/tldr★ 9same name
- jamesblackwell/falcondeck★ 7same name
30 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 35 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Use these four parts, in this order, with these plain headings.
- Distinctive: line 31
If nothing is needed, say "Nothing right now."
- Distinctive: line 48
Aim for 150 to 250 words: If it runs longer, you are explaining, not summarising.
- Distinctive: line 53
Never soften or drop bad news to keep it simple.
- Distinctive: line 54
Never drop a decision because it is hard to explain.
- Distinctive: line 56
If something was not checked or not run, say so plainly.
- Distinctive: line 57
Do not claim the reader approved anything they have not approved.
- Distinctive: line 61
Read each sentence and ask: would a bright friend who has never seen this project understand it?
- Distinctive: line 63
If not, rewrite that sentence.
- Distinctive: line 69
If the user has had to ask for plain language more than once, and a memory or preferences system is available, save that as a standing …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 35 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TLDR
The reader is smart but has lost the thread. Your last replies were too long, too technical, or assumed labels they don't carry in their head. Give them the whole picture in under a minute of reading, then stop.
This is a rewrite of what you already know, not new work. Do not run new investigations to produce it. If something is unverified, say so in plain words rather than going to check.
Shape of the answer
Use these four parts, in this order, with these plain headings.
- Bottom line — one or two sentences. Answer the two questions the reader actually has: "Is anything broken?" and "Do I need to do something right now?" Lead with bad news if there is any.
- What happened — two to four bullets. What was done and why it matters, in everyday words. Say what did NOT change when that is the reassuring part ("this is paperwork; the product behaves the same").
- What I need from you — a numbered list, most important first. Each
item is one decision or one action, and says:
- what to do or decide, phrased so a one-word reply works;
- your recommendation, in one clause;
- what happens if they do nothing. If nothing is needed, say "Nothing right now."
- What can wait — one or two lines on things that are parked and need no attention. Do not list them all; name the group.
Language rules
- No labels on their own. Ticket numbers, decision-log numbers, checkpoint names, file names, branch names, commit hashes, tool names and acronyms are out. Describe the thing by what it does. If the reader will need a label to find, click or type something, put it in brackets AFTER the plain description: "the settings file is almost at its size limit (TICKET-123)".
- Swap jargon for its effect. Not "CI is red on pip-audit" but "one of the automatic safety checks is failing because a library needs an upgrade; it is a known item and nothing is at risk today."
- Short sentences, everyday words. One idea per sentence.
- No tables, no code blocks, no nested bullets.
- Numbers only when they change the decision.
- Aim for 150 to 250 words. If it runs longer, you are explaining, not summarising; cut.
Honesty rules
- Never soften or drop bad news to keep it simple. Simple words, same truth.
- Never drop a decision because it is hard to explain. Find the plain version of it.
- If something was not checked or not run, say so plainly.
- Do not claim the reader approved anything they have not approved.
Check before sending
Read each sentence and ask: would a bright friend who has never seen this project understand it? Does every request say exactly what reply you need? If not, rewrite that sentence.
Afterwards
- Stay at this level for the rest of the session. Offer depth ("say 'more' on any item") instead of supplying it.
- If the user has had to ask for plain language more than once, and a memory or preferences system is available, save that as a standing preference so future sessions start in plain language.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

