handover
Skill0 starsChanged 35 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write a date-stamped, topic-scoped handover document so a fresh session can continue the work cheaply — or pick one up and resume from it. Use when the user asks for a handover/handoff doc, wants to fork a topic into its own session, or says to resume/re-open a handover.
51 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- thiagobluhm/o1memtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hmislk/hmistheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- loonylabs-dev/claude-setuptheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- oubakiou/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vrppaul/claude-reviewtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- konlue/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use harness-init, incident and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
steptianSkillharness-init
初始化 .harness 开发框架,集成代码修改影响范围评估和测试覆盖建议功能。触发词:'初始化新项目'、'harness init'、'更新 harness'、'分析影响范围'、'评估修改影响'
Also in 3 projects that use this
JkudjoSkillincident
Production incident response — structured triage, hypothesis tree, safe remediation, incident record
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkillbrainstorm
Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-tickets
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcaveman
Ultra-compressed response style that reduces output token count while preserving technical accuracy, with intensity levels and auto-clarity safety rules
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 51
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- hmislk/hmis★ 244same name
- chenklein26-maker/Harness-Starter★ 119same name
- k1ein-chen/Harness-Starter★ 119same name
- eai-org/agent-toolkit★ 85same name
- manusco/resonance★ 38same name
- chacosoldier/compabob★ 34same name
- randommonicle/claude-skills★ 27same name
- L-X-T/ng-agentic-skills★ 13same name
- marcogalluccio/company-brain-os★ 7same name
41 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Scope it: If the user named a topic, capture ONLY that thread, not the whole session.
- Very specific: line 65
Close or supersede predecessors: If this handover continues an older one, edit the old file's Status to SUPERSEDED-BY <new file> and fix …
- Very specific: line 74
No file named? Read handovers/INDEX.md, show OPEN handovers, confirm which (most recent on the named topic is the default guess).
- Distinctive: line 76
Read the handover, then the Pointers in the order given — and only those files.
- Distinctive: line 78
Verify before acting: open threads may have moved since the doc was written (check the balls-in-court against reality — sent mail, new …
- Very specific: line 86
When the topic genuinely completes, set Status to CLOSED and update the index — an accurate index is the audit trail the user keeps this …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Handover
Two modes. Detect which from the request: write (capture state for a future session) or pickup (resume from an existing handover).
Handover docs are the project's audit trail of deep dives: date-stamped, topic-scoped, findable months later. They capture TASK STATE — what memory must not hold (memory is for durable facts and preferences; a handover is a snapshot of work in flight).
Where they live
handovers/ at the project root. Default this directory to git-ignored
— handovers carry names, half-formed thinking, and private context; check
.gitignore and add handovers/ if absent, telling the user. Only a
deliberately scrubbed handover ever belongs in version control.
Naming: YYYY-MM-DD_<topic-slug>.md (e.g. 2026-09-16_entity-formation.md).
One topic per file — if the session spans several separable topics, ask
whether to fork them into separate handovers; that is the point of the
system.
Mode 1 — write
- Scope it. If the user named a topic, capture ONLY that thread, not the whole session. A general end-of-session handover may still fork into several topical files.
- Structure:
# Handover — <topic> (<date>)
**Status:** OPEN
**Continues:** <prior handover file, if this extends one> / fresh
**One-line mission:** <what this thread is trying to achieve>
**Pickup grade:** <frontier — judgment/strategy/adversarial work ahead |
mixed — frontier session that should delegate the listed mechanical subtasks
to lower-model subagents | execution — a lower model can run this from the
spec below> <one clause saying why>
## State — where things stand
<decisions made (with the WHY), what's done, what's ruled out>
## Open threads
<each: what, who holds the ball, next concrete action>
## Gotchas
<things the next session would waste an hour rediscovering>
## Pointers — read these, in this order
<repo-relative file paths; POINT at files, never duplicate their content —
copies drift, pointers don't. Include line refs where useful.>
## Out of scope here
<adjacent topics deliberately excluded, and which handover covers them>- Update the index.
handovers/INDEX.md, newest first:| date | topic | status | file |— create it if missing. The index is what makes "find that old deep-dive" a ten-second job. - Close or supersede predecessors. If this handover continues an older
one, edit the old file's Status to
SUPERSEDED-BY <new file>and fix its index row. Never leave two OPEN handovers on one topic. - Route durable facts to memory, not the handover — a preference or permanent fact learned this session goes in the memory system; the handover gets task state only.
Mode 2 — pickup
- No file named? Read
handovers/INDEX.md, show OPEN handovers, confirm which (most recent on the named topic is the default guess). - Read the handover, then the Pointers in the order given — and only those files. Resist re-exploring; the doc exists so you don't.
- Verify before acting: open threads may have moved since the doc was written (check the balls-in-court against reality — sent mail, new files, replies). State what changed since the handover, then continue the work. 3b. Honor the Pickup grade: on a frontier-model session, delegate the handover's mechanical subtasks to lower-model subagents rather than burning frontier tokens on execution work (see the user's model-economy norm in their global CLAUDE.md, if they keep one).
- When the topic genuinely completes, set Status to
CLOSEDand update the index — an accurate index is the audit trail the user keeps this system for.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

