mantis-history
Skill2.5k starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Analyzes the repository's version control system (VCS) history to extract past vulnerabilities, security fixes, and vulnerability patterns. Use as an initial pre-processing step to build a historical vulnerabilities database (workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl) that informs subsequent stages about past issues and fixes. Don't use for code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 42
All under --state_root/workspace/ (cache, historical_learnings.jsonl, extraction script): kept outside the target tree.
- Very specific: line 116
Read existing summaries (e.g.
- Very specific: line 139
Read the active pass number from the state file workspace/.mantis_state.json and resolve the current ISO 8601 timestamp.
- Distinctive: line 142
Write a script (e.g. Python, bash, or your choice) directly in your workspace that interacts with your repository version control system …
- Distinctive: line 150
Commit Message/Description Pre-filtering: Before retrieving diffs, the script should dynamically determine relevant keywords for commit …
- Very specific: line 174
Rewrite detection: before trusting the cache, verify _analyzed_head still resolves in the current LIVE history (git: git cat-file -e …
- Distinctive: line 181
Batch Processing (Batching Diffs): Instead of making one LLM call per commit diff, the script should batch multiple commit diffs and …
- Distinctive: line 186
Model Selection: Use lightweight and cost-efficient models for the initial commit analysis/filtering, and only fall back to heavier model …
- Distinctive: line 201
Missing Information: Do not overindex on the lack of security-related keywords.
- Very specific: line 233
Run the script you just wrote to analyze the VCS history, process revisions, and generate the workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl file.
- Very specific: line 235
Wait for the script to finish and verify that workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl has been written successfully and contains extracted …
- Distinctive: line 239
When complete, notify the user.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
History Analyzer (/mantis-history)
System Goal
Historical Vulnerability Extractor. Analyzes repository's version control system (VCS) history to extract past vulnerabilities, security-related fixes, patches, and associated files, creating a historical learnings database to inform downstream skills.
Command Definition
- Command:
/mantis-history - Description: Analyzes repository's version control system (VCS) history to
extract past vulnerabilities and fixes, producing a structured historical
learnings file (
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl). - Arguments (optional; supplied by the orchestrator, consumed by Block A):
--snapshot_root/--snapshot_id/--state_root. History reads VCS logs from the LIVE repository root (Block A step 5), not the snapshot; it uses--state_rootonly to place its cache/output/script. All absent -> DEGRADED (behaves as today, live cwd).
Input/Output Contract
- Reads:
workspace/.mantis_state.json(to track current loop pass).- Codebase directory structure and key files (to determine stack).
- VCS history logs (commit messages, titles, diffs).
mantis-summary.md(optional, if available).- Internal history analysis cache (optional, if exists).
- Writes:
- VCS extraction script (written on-the-fly to workspace).
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl.- Internal history analysis cache.
- All under
--state_root/workspace/(cache,historical_learnings.jsonl, extraction script): kept outside the target tree. Optionalhistory_statusmarker (UNSUPPORTED_VCS/PARTIAL_SHALLOW).
- Preconditions:
- Target repository and VCS logs must be accessible.
- Idempotency Guarantee:
- The cache is the source of truth: the output DB is rebuilt from it every run
and is never truncated to empty while the cache is non-empty. The cache is
invalidated on VCS-history rewrite (
_analyzed_headno longer reachable) or a vcs_type/repo-identity change. Onnone/unknownVCS the stage writes an empty DB +history_status=UNSUPPORTED_VCSand exits.
- The cache is the source of truth: the output DB is rebuilt from it every run
and is never truncated to empty while the cache is non-empty. The cache is
invalidated on VCS-history rewrite (
Instructions
Step 0: Locator Resolution (run first)
LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
(used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
--state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
-> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
- SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
(symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
line-range and line-existence logic.
- STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
(mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
(the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.CRITICAL for history: the pinned snapshot copy STRIPS .git/.hg/.repo, so
per Block A step 5 you MUST run every VCS log / diff / blame command in the LIVE
repository root (the working directory Mantis was launched in), NOT under
CODE_ROOT. Do NOT stop because CODE_ROOT lacks VCS metadata. Write the cache,
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, and your generated extraction script
under --state_root/workspace/ (STATE-RELATIVE) — never into the target tree,
so a sync/clean cannot wipe them. Record active_snapshot.snapshot_id on
entries only for provenance.
Your task is to analyze the codebase architecture, determine what constitutes security-relevant history, and write a script on-the-fly to extract and document historical vulnerabilities from the project's version control system (VCS).
Execute the history analysis stage as follows:
Phase 1: Analyze Codebase and Define Target History:
- Read existing summaries (e.g.
mantis-summary.mdif available) or quickly inspect the root codebase structure to understand the primary files, programming languages, and core components. - Determine what types of historical security issues (e.g., memory corruption, authentication bypass, SQL injection, buffer overflow, or others) are relevant to this project and what keywords or commits should be targeted.
- Read existing summaries (e.g.
Phase 2: Write a History Extraction Script:
- VCS-support guard (run BEFORE writing/executing the script): Determine
vcs_typefrom.mantis_state.jsonvcs_info(or detect it in the LIVE root). Ifvcs_typeisnoneorunknown, OR the VCS history is otherwise unreachable: write an EMPTYworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, set a top-of-file / sidecar markerhistory_status = "UNSUPPORTED_VCS", and EXIT — never fabricate history. Formulti-vcs(.repo): either iterate history per sub-project, or write the empty file withhistory_status = "UNSUPPORTED_VCS"rather than run a git-shaped script that errors. For a SHALLOW git clone (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository== true): proceed but sethistory_status = "PARTIAL_SHALLOW"so downstream stages do NOT read "no historical vuln for this file" as "clean." - Read the active pass number from the state file
workspace/.mantis_state.jsonand resolve the current ISO 8601 timestamp. - Write a script (e.g. Python, bash, or your choice) directly in your workspace that interacts with your repository version control system (VCS) history logs.
Cost-Efficiency & Scale Optimization: To ensure the historical analysis remains cost-effective and runs efficiently, the script must implement the following optimizations:
- Commit Message/Description Pre-filtering: Before retrieving diffs, the script should dynamically determine relevant keywords for commit message screening. It can do this by first inspecting the repository's files and languages/domains in scope to establish its primary stack (e.g. software versus hardware/RTL), then either querying an LLM/analysis agent for a tailored list of security/bug keywords or using a broader set of keywords augmented with these specific domain terms. Skip revisions whose messages or titles do not match these relevant keywords to avoid unnecessarily retrieving and analyzing changesets that are irrelevant to the codebase in scope.
- Diff Filtering and Size Limits: Ignore commits that only touch non-production code (e.g., tests, documentation, or configuration files). Skip commits with excessively large diffs (e.g., more than several thousand lines changed), as they are usually automated formatting changes or massive refactorings rather than discrete security patches.
- Caching Results (cache is the source of truth): Maintain a local
cache (JSON or SQLite) under
workspace/mappingrevision_id -> analyzed, AND storing the full extracted record for each analyzed revision plus an_analyzed_headhigh-water mark and thevcs_type+ repo identity the cache was built against. On each run, REBUILDworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonlfrom the cache (do NOT skip a revision merely because the cache says "analyzed" and then leave the output empty — that is the desync bug). NEVER truncate a non-empty output DB to empty. Only analyze revisions NEWER than_analyzed_head. Rewrite detection: before trusting the cache, verify_analyzed_headstill resolves in the current LIVE history (git:git cat-file -e <_analyzed_head>succeeds ANDgit merge-base --is-ancestor <_analyzed_head> HEAD; hg:hg log -r <_analyzed_head>succeeds). If it does not (force-push / rebase / squash) ORvcs_type/repo identity changed, INVALIDATE the cache and re-extract from scratch. - Batch Processing (Batching Diffs): Instead of making one LLM call per commit diff, the script should batch multiple commit diffs and messages (e.g. 3 to 5 commits) into a single LLM call. Ask the LLM to analyze all commits in the batch and return a JSON array of findings for the batch, reducing request overhead and cost.
- Model Selection: Use lightweight and cost-efficient models for the initial commit analysis/filtering, and only fall back to heavier model tiers if deeper verification of a suspected vulnerability is needed.
- Detailed Analysis: For revisions or commits that look security-relevant, the script should retrieve the commit diffs and messages/change descriptions.
- LLM/Agent Analysis: The script should make API calls (e.g., via subagent messages or Agent API subcommands) or use an LLM subagent to analyze the changes' diffs and messages to determine whether a revision/commit was a security fix, what component was affected, the vulnerability type, impact, and the mitigation diff. Make sure it uses batching and caching to minimize API calls.
- Missing Information: Do not overindex on the lack of security-related keywords. Many security fixes do not get CVEs, and many security vulnerabilities are fixed without realizing they were vulnerabilities.
- Output Format: Instruct your script to output the extracted findings
into a JSONL file named
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl, matching the following format:
- VCS-support guard (run BEFORE writing/executing the script): Determine
Historical Learnings Schema Format (workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl)
{
"revision_id": "...",
"title": "...",
"description": "...",
"code_paths": ["file:line_number"],
"vuln_type": "...",
"mitigation_diff": "...",
"cve": "...",
"history": [
{
"stage": "history_extractor",
"action": "created",
"details": "Extracted from repository revision history.",
"pass_number": <current_pass_number>,
"timestamp": "<current_iso8601_timestamp>"
}
]
}- Phase 3: Execute and Verify:
- Run the script you just wrote to analyze the VCS history, process
revisions, and generate the
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonlfile. - Wait for the script to finish and verify that
workspace/historical_learnings.jsonlhas been written successfully and contains extracted data.
- Run the script you just wrote to analyze the VCS history, process
revisions, and generate the
When complete, notify the user.
Trending
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Who's talking about google/mantis
- Matheus Battisti“O Google lançou uma ferramenta que caça falhas de segurança com IA (Google Mantis)”YouTube · Jul 30, 2026 · 9.2k views
- ☕ Claude Code Cafe“🔒 コードの脆弱性を AI に探させて再現まで確かめる Google のリポジトリで公開された mantis #claude #claudecode”YouTube · Sep 8, 2026 · 647 views
- o0o0o0o“Your Tests Pass. Is Your Code Safe? Google’s AI Security Agents”YouTube · Sep 30, 2026 · 180 views
- ☕️ Claude Code Cafe“🔒 Let an Agent Find Your Security Flaws and Reproduce Them — mantis #claude #claudecode”YouTube · Sep 9, 2026 · 40 views
- 智用AI“Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? #Shorts”YouTube · Sep 10, 2026 · 26 views
The biggest 5 of 46 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 46
Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Bluesky (46 times).
On GitHub · 32
- Oct 30, 2026Design sandboxed agentic bug hunting, RCA, and novel vulnerability discovery — combustrrr/code-analysis-dashboard0 reactions
- Oct 30, 2026Epic: governed scanner and agentic analysis expansion — combustrrr/code-analysis-dashboard0 reactions
- Oct 28, 2026[radar-spike] google/mantis skills — sandbox threat-model (no CI gate) — pablontiv/a4s0 reactions
- Oct 27, 2026google 'mantis' — AI 코딩 에이전트용 취약점 자동 발견·재현·패치 툴킷 (10/26, GitHub) — roomedia/ax-trend0 reactions
- Oct 24, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-22 → 0-unstable-2026-10-24 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
27 more on GitHub
- Oct 23, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-17 → 0-unstable-2026-10-22 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 17, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-16 → 0-unstable-2026-10-17 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 16, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-15 → 0-unstable-2026-10-16 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-14 → 0-unstable-2026-10-15 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 14, 2026feat: SAST — LLM alert triage of CodeQL and Semgrep findings with human sign-off (PR/CI, Advanced) — sparkgeo/github-actions0 reactions
- Oct 14, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-13 → 0-unstable-2026-10-14 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 13, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 52093f7 → 49ab993 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 13, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-05 → 0-unstable-2026-10-13 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 76bf653 → f671cd8 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-04 → 0-unstable-2026-10-05 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 30447e1 → f5656dd — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: f48a85e → 30447e1 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-patch (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-meta-agent (critical risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-dedupe (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-threat-model (low risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-history (medium risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-structural-index (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-calibrate (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-09-28 → 0-unstable-2026-10-04 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 3, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-09-18 → 0-unstable-2026-09-28 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Sep 27, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: init at 0-unstable-2026-09-18 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Sep 22, 2026fix(rust): patch parameter bounds validation bugs to avoid panic — morrowc/mrtparser0 reactions
- Sep 22, 2026fix(cpp): add minimal bound checks for packet lengths — morrowc/mrtparser0 reactions
- Sep 11, 2026mode — chogng/ash0 reactions
- Jul 27, 2026Integrate Google Mantis Skills as CRSs — ossf/oss-crs0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 3, 2026Add Google Mantis — agentic AI security review pipeline — ottosulin/awesome-ai-security0 reactions
On YouTube · 9
- Jul 30, 2026O Google lançou uma ferramenta que caça falhas de segurança com IA (Google Mantis) — Matheus Battisti - Hora de Codar9.2k views · 29 comments
- Sep 8, 2026🔒 コードの脆弱性を AI に探させて再現まで確かめる Google のリポジトリで公開された mantis #claude #claudecode — ☕ Claude Code Cafe647 views
- Sep 30, 2026Your Tests Pass. Is Your Code Safe? Google’s AI Security Agents — o0o0o0o180 views
- Sep 9, 2026🔒 Let an Agent Find Your Security Flaws and Reproduce Them — mantis #claude #claudecode — ☕️ Claude Code Cafe40 views
- Sep 10, 2026Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? #Shorts — 智用AIsays it tested it26 views
4 more on YouTube
- Sep 3, 2026今日のAI実用ニュース4選:Slack・Skills・動画理解・WebGPU【9月3日】 — 毎日最速AIニュース21 views
- Sep 10, 2026Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? — 智用AIsays it tested it19 views
- Jul 15, 2026Developer tools and hidden risk & Enterprise agents need real infrastructure - AI News (Jul 15, 2... — The Automated Daily9 views
- Sep 3, 2026Googleの新Skills「Mantis」公開、本番PCで試すな #Shorts — 毎日最速AIニュース5 views
On Bluesky · 5
- Sep 15, 2026Mantis : toolkit open source de Google pour agents de coding, conçu pour trouver, reproduire et corriger des vulnérabilités de façon… — @camilleroux.com3 likes and reposts · 1 reply
- Oct 1, 2026GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously find, reproduce, and patch vulnerabilities.… — @tech-trending.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Sep 23, 2026#ばばさん通信ダイジェスト 賛否関わらず話題になった/なりそうなものを共有しています。 GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously… — @netmarkjp.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Jul 3, 2026Three repos that are leading our path forward in scaling AppSec workflows: 1. github.com/google/mantis 2. github.com/anthropics/d... 3.… — @javanrasokat.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Oct 1, 2026🤖 GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously find,... 要約:… — @ai-bs-bot.bsky.social0 likes and reposts · 1 reply
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- mantis-configureSkill
- mantis-launchSkill
- mantis-adviseSkill
- mantis-architectureSkill
- mantis-calibrateSkill
- mantis-chainSkill
- mantis-criticSkill
- mantis-dedupeSkill
- mantis-meta-agentSkill
- mantis-patchSkill
- mantis-pipeline-adapterSkill
- mantis-planSkill
- mantis-reflectSkill
- mantis-reportSkill
- mantis-reproduceSkill
- mantis-researcherSkill
- mantis-reviewSkill
- mantis-structural-indexSkill
- mantis-summarizeSkill
- mantis-threat-modelSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

