mantis-architecture
Skill2.5k starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Synthesizes raw learnings and codebase analysis into an interlinked Markdown Knowledge Base (KB). Use at the beginning of a loop to build or update architecture.md, entities, and vulnerabilities. Don't use for generating threat models or formulating execution plans.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 239
Create or update files in the workspace/kb/ directory using standard Markdown.
- Very specific: line 260
Important Formatting Rules: Use relative links to cross-reference entities and vulnerabilities (e.g., Auth Module).
- Distinctive: line 302
If an entity file claims a variable is un-sanitized (based on an old learning) but the live code now contains a sanitization function …
- Distinctive: line 305
If a learning is repeatedly proven wrong by the current trajectory insights, actively correct it to prevent the "wrong learning" from …
- Very specific: line 308
When you correct or re-confirm a finding-derived assertion, re-stamp the KB_SNAPSHOT marker on that KB file.
- Very specific: line 320
Commit by Moving: Only after verifying synthesis success, move workspace/learnings.jsonl to the archive directory:
- Very specific: line 322
Ensure the target directory exists (e.g., mkdir -p workspace/archive/learnings/).
- Distinctive: line 334
Snapshot the KB (per-pass archive): After a successful synthesis, copy the whole KB tree to a per-pass archive:
- Very specific: line 336
Ensure the directory exists (mkdir -p workspace/archive/kb/).
- Very specific: line 341
Stamp state: Write kb_snapshot_id = SNAPSHOT_ID (CUR from step 0b) into workspace/.mantis_state.json.
- Very specific: line 346
If synthesis fails or is interrupted, leave workspace/learnings.jsonl intact in its original location to ensure no data is lost.
- Very specific: line 348
If workspace/learnings.jsonl is ABSENT on entry (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 354
When complete, notify the user.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Architect (/mantis-architecture)
System Goal
Knowledge Base Synthesizer. Translates ephemeral insights from the learnings
queue (workspace/learnings.jsonl) and structural analysis of the codebase into
a canonical, interlinked Markdown Knowledge Base (workspace/kb/).
Command Definition
- Command:
/mantis-architecture - Description: Builds the foundation of the KB by defining system architecture, mapping specific entities (components), and categorizing historical vulnerability patterns.
- Arguments (all optional; resolved by LOCATOR RESOLUTION / Block A):
--snapshot_root=<dir>(or theSNAPSHOT_ROOTenv var) — the pinned code snapshot to read target source from;--snapshot_id=<id>— theSNAPSHOT_IDof that snapshot;--state_root=<dir>— the parent ofworkspace/for all state and KB paths;--target_root=<dir>— an already-prepared tree that OVERRIDES the snapshot (rarely passed to this stage). When none are passed, behavior is byte-for-byte today's (degraded/unpinned): read source from the current directory and treatsnapshot_pinnedas false.
Input/Output Contract
- Reads:
workspace/learnings.jsonl(raw insights from the current round).workspace/historical_learnings.jsonl(optional, past vulnerability metadata).- Codebase directory structure and key source files.
- Existing Markdown files in
workspace/kb/(to validate/decay check). workspace/.mantis_state.json(to retrieve pass count).workspace/.mantis_state.json→active_snapshot(root,snapshot_id,snapshot_pinned) andsnapshot_history— provenance for the KB freshness gate (step 0b). Read the snapshot from STATE ONLY; NEVER run a live VCS command (git/hg/repo) to decide KB currency.workspace/.mantis_state.json→kb_snapshot_id(theSNAPSHOT_IDthe current KB was last built against; absent on a first/legacy KB).workspace/.mantis_state.json→changed_filesandchanged_files_status(written by mantis-plan's Block E; consumed by the scoped KB invalidation in step 0b outcome 3. Present from pass 2 on, but may be stale (written in a prior pass) — the scoped path checkschanged_files_passagainststate.pass_numberand falls back to full rebuild if they differ.)
- Writes:
- Markdown files under
workspace/kb/(architecture.md,entities/[component_name].md,vulnerabilities/[CWE-ID].md,index.md). workspace/kb/dependencies.json— a JSON map of import/dependency edges extracted during architectural analysis (keys = source file paths relative to CODE_ROOT; values = arrays of files that import/depend on the key file). This is consumed bymantis-plan's dependency-aware fan-out (Phase 2). If the codebase has no parseable import structure, write{}. Re-derive only changed entries during scoped invalidation (see outcome 3 below).- Archives
workspace/learnings.jsonltoworkspace/archive/learnings/learnings_pass_${N}_${X}.jsonl. - A
<!-- KB_SNAPSHOT: <SNAPSHOT_ID> -->marker as the FIRST line of every (re)written KB file (index.md, eachentities/*.md, eachvulnerabilities/*.md), pluskb_snapshot_id=SNAPSHOT_IDinworkspace/.mantis_state.json. - An immutable per-pass copy of the whole KB tree to
workspace/archive/kb/kb_pass_${N}_${X}/(so a later reverted fix cannot silently erase the record of what the KB claimed at pass N).
- Markdown files under
- Preconditions:
workspace/learnings.jsonlmust exist.
- Idempotency Guarantee:
- Transactional: moves
workspace/learnings.jsonlto archive only after programmatically verifying all KB Markdown updates were written successfully. KB files are overwritten in-place. - Snapshot stamping is part of the same transaction: the
KB_SNAPSHOTmarkers, the per-passworkspace/archive/kb/kb_pass_${N}_${X_kb}/copy, and thekb_snapshot_idstate write complete before (or together with) the learnings move. On any failure, leaveworkspace/learnings.jsonlintact.
- Transactional: moves
Instructions
Analyze the codebase and pending learnings to construct a permanent, Markdown-based memory for future agents.
Execute the architecture stage as follows:
- LOCATOR RESOLUTION (Block A, inlined below):
LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
(used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
--state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
-> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
- SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
(symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
line-range and line-existence logic.
- STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
(mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
(the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.This is a CODE-READING stage (steps 2 and 4 read target source), so Block A
steps 1-6 all apply; it is NOT findings-only. Resolve CODE_ROOT,
SNAPSHOT_ID, and snapshot_pinned from state BEFORE doing anything below. Per
Block A step 3, all workspace/kb/... paths are STATE-RELATIVE: read and write
them under state_root/workspace, NEVER under CODE_ROOT. Read all target
source under CODE_ROOT. Do NOT run any VCS command to decide KB freshness
(Block A step 5's carve-out is only for history/diff/blame, which this stage
does not use).
0b. KB SNAPSHOT FRESHNESS GATE (mechanical; STATE + KB marker only, NO live VCS):
- `CUR` = `SNAPSHOT_ID` (resolved by Block A; the empty string if
`active_snapshot` was absent). `PINNED` = `snapshot_pinned` (false if absent).
- **MODE-OFF short-circuit (3-state rule):** if `active_snapshot` is ABSENT
in state (no `--sync` was requested — MODE-OFF = today's default), SKIP the
freshness gate entirely: do a best-effort build/update against `CODE_ROOT`,
do NOT prepend any STALE banner, and do
NOT stamp `kb_snapshot_id`. This is byte-for-byte today's behavior. (Only
HALT and PINNED run the gate below.)
- `KB_ID` = the `kb_snapshot_id` value in `.mantis_state.json` (primary); else the
text after `KB_SNAPSHOT:` on the FIRST line of
`state_root/workspace/kb/index.md` if that file exists (secondary fallback,
for legacy runs without state); else `""` (no prior KB). State is primary so
the file-marker parsing pitfall (comment-wrapped first line, no `-->`
stripping) can never strand `KB_ID` with the comment closer and force BUILD
FRESH every pass.
- Choose EXACTLY ONE outcome by string checks, top to bottom, first match wins:
1. `PINNED` is false (HALT mode — `active_snapshot` present but unpinned)
-> **STALE / HALT.** Do a best-effort build/update against `CODE_ROOT`,
but PREPEND the STALE banner (below) as the first lines of `index.md`.
Do NOT claim currency: leave the
banner in place. Set `kb_snapshot_id` = `CUR` (a `live:` id).
2. Else `KB_ID` == `CUR` (both non-empty) -> **CURRENT.** Do the incremental
update + decay-check (step 4) as today. Re-stamp `KB_SNAPSHOT: CUR` on
every (re)written file. REMOVE any STALE banner previously prepended to
`index.md`.
3. Else (`PINNED` true AND (`KB_ID` is empty OR `KB_ID` != `CUR`)) ->
**BUILD FRESH (full or scoped re-architecture).** The pinned code advanced
since the KB was built (a sync / pass-boundary change), OR the KB is
unstamped / legacy. Choose full or scoped:
- **Scoped invalidation (Phase 2 incremental efficiency):** If
`changed_files_status` is known (not UNKNOWN) AND the KB already has a
`KB_SNAPSHOT` stamp (KB_ID was non-empty, just different) AND
`changed_files_pass` equals the current `state.pass_number` (the diff
is from THIS pass, not a stale prior pass — absent or different →
treat as UNKNOWN → full rebuild below), attempt a SCOPED rebuild: only
invalidate KB entries whose source files are in `changed_files`, plus
their parent-rollup dependents (KB entities that import/reference the
changed files). Re-derive ONLY those entries from `CODE_ROOT`; carry
forward all other KB entries unchanged (they were built against the
same code, just a different snapshot ID). Re-stamp `KB_SNAPSHOT: CUR`
on every (re)written file.
- **Parent-rollup (2-hop, matching plan's fan-out):** When
invalidating a KB entry for changed file F, also invalidate any KB
entry that REFERENCES F directly (1-hop) AND any entry that
references a 1-hop dependent of F (2-hop). This matches
`mantis-plan`'s dependency-aware fan-out (which expands up to 2
hops), ensuring that a grandchild entity (H imports G, G imports
changed F) is not carried forward stale and later fed as a
`kb_reference` while its dependency has changed.
- **Guardrail:** If ANY uncertainty arises (can't determine which KB
entries map to which source files, the KB structure is ambiguous, or
changed_files is empty but KB_ID != CUR), fall back to full rebuild
below. Never carry forward a stale entry for a changed file.
- **Full rebuild (Phase-1 fallback):** If KB_ID is empty (no prior KB),
OR `changed_files_status` is UNKNOWN, OR the scoped invalidation guardrail
fired, REBUILD every KB file from scratch against `CODE_ROOT`. Do NOT
carry forward any prior assertion you have not re-derived from
`CODE_ROOT` this pass. Stamp `KB_SNAPSHOT: CUR`. REMOVE any STALE banner.
- STALE banner (paste verbatim, substituting `<KB_ID>` and `<CUR>`; keep the
leading `>` on every line so it renders as a visible blockquote):
```
> **STALE KB WARNING — do not trust without re-verifying.**
> snapshot_pinned=false, or the KB was built against a different snapshot.
> KB_SNAPSHOT=<KB_ID> does not match active_snapshot.snapshot_id=<CUR>.
> Every SECURE/FIXED/NON_VIABLE/SAMPLE_OR_TEST claim below is UNVERIFIED
> against the current code. Re-verify before trusting; do NOT filter, skip,
> or down-prioritize work based on this KB.
```Read the Inbox (
workspace/learnings.jsonlandworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonl):- Parse the contents of
workspace/learnings.jsonl(andworkspace/historical_learnings.jsonlif it exists). Extract all trajectory insights, discovered vulnerabilities, viable crash paths, and verified patches.
- Parse the contents of
Analyze Source Code Boundaries:
- Examine the directory structure and key source files under
CODE_ROOT(the pinned snapshot resolved by Block A; use absolute paths per Block A step 6, and do NOT run a VCS command). Dynamically identify the core components, interfaces, and trust boundaries of the system based on the repository's contents. This applies broadly across domains: whether it is a software system (e.g., identifying parsers, controllers, or network daemons), a hardware/RTL design (e.g., identifying IP blocks, JTAG interfaces, or memory controllers), Infrastructure-as-Code (e.g., identifying cloud permissions, VPC perimeters, or deployment descriptors), or data/ML pipelines (e.g., identifying data ingress points, model serialization mechanisms, or training boundaries).
- Examine the directory structure and key source files under
Build or Update the Knowledge Base (KB):
Create or update files in the
workspace/kb/directory using standard Markdown. Follow these strict paths:workspace/kb/architecture.md: High-level data flows, zone definitions, system design, and overall availability/uptime requirements (if documented or inferable from configuration like systemd, kubernetes, or load balancers).workspace/kb/entities/[component_name].md: Specific definitions for components (e.g.,auth_module.md). Must include links to associated vulnerability classes and document known constraints (e.g., "This module sanitizes input X"). Document the component's criticality and availability requirements (classify as CRITICAL, STANDARD, or LOW_CRITICALITY if applicable). Incorporate trajectory insights here.workspace/kb/vulnerabilities/[CWE-ID_or_BugClass].md: Descriptions of bug classes (e.g.,CWE-79.mdorMemory-Corruption.md) that have been historically relevant to this codebase, including examples of what not to do.workspace/kb/index.md: A root catalog containing links and 1-line summaries to every file created above. This is the map the Planner will read.
- Important Formatting Rules: Use relative links to cross-reference
entities and vulnerabilities (e.g.,
[Auth Module](entities/auth_module.md)). Ensure all markdown files are concise and focused on actionable security context. - Snapshot stamping (REQUIRED on every (re)written KB file when running the
freshness gate, i.e. HALT or PINNED; never in MODE-OFF): Make the FIRST
line of
index.md, eachentities/*.md, and eachvulnerabilities/*.mdexactly<!-- KB_SNAPSHOT: <SNAPSHOT_ID> -->(substituteCURfrom step 0b; it is an HTML comment so it does not render). This is how the next pass's freshness gate (step 0b) detects drift. MODE-OFF gate (3-state rule): ifactive_snapshotis ABSENT (MODE-OFF — no--syncwas requested), do NOT stamp the per-fileKB_SNAPSHOTmarker:CURis the empty string (arch:145: "the empty string ifactive_snapshotwas absent"), so the mandated marker would be<!-- KB_SNAPSHOT: -->(empty value) — a snapshot-era artifact that did not exist in Phase 1. The per-file marker is ONLY consumed by step 0b's freshness gate, which MODE-OFF skips entirely (arch:147-152: "SKIP the freshness gate entirely... This is byte-for-byte today's behavior. Only HALT and PINNED run the gate below."). This MODE-OFF gate mirrors the freshness gate logic below and step 0b's outcome clauses, which mention per-fileKB_SNAPSHOT: CURstamping only in HALT/PINNED outcomes (CURRENT:164, scoped BUILD FRESH:178, full BUILD FRESH:195). - Per-file
KB_SNAPSHOTstamping is the sole provenance mechanism for KB assertions. Do NOT write per-assertion(AS_OF:<snapshot>)tags — theAS_OFre-verification reader was never built, and staleness protection is already provided by the freshness gate (step 0b) comparingkb_snapshot_idtoSNAPSHOT_ID, plus per-findingdiscovery_commit(enforced bymantis-criticBlock B). A later-reverted fix is caught by these mechanisms, not by per-assertion tags.
Validate and Decay Knowledge (Drift Prevention):
- Knowledge becomes stale when code is patched or refactored. Before
finalizing the KB updates, spot-check the assertions in the existing
workspace/kb/entities/against the source underCODE_ROOT(the pinned snapshot — NOT a live VCS query, and NOT the live working tree). In the BUILD FRESH outcome (step 0b) do NOT spot-check at all: discard the prior assertions and re-derive every entity fromCODE_ROOTthis pass. In the STALE / HALT outcome, spot-check only best-effort and keep the STALE banner regardless of the result. - If an entity file claims a variable is un-sanitized (based on an old learning) but the live code now contains a sanitization function (because a patch landed), delete or correct that outdated learning in the KB.
- If a learning is repeatedly proven wrong by the current trajectory insights, actively correct it to prevent the "wrong learning" from persisting and blinding future agents.
- When you correct or re-confirm a finding-derived assertion, re-stamp the
KB_SNAPSHOTmarker on that KB file.
- Knowledge becomes stale when code is patched or refactored. Before
finalizing the KB updates, spot-check the assertions in the existing
Transactional Inbox Clearing & Archiving:
- To prevent infinite loops and token bloat, you must clear the queue and archive the learnings.
- Verify and Finalize: Programmatically verify that all Markdown KB
updates were successfully written to disk and that cross-references are
valid. Also verify, before committing, that every (re)written KB file
BEGINS with its
<!-- KB_SNAPSHOT: <SNAPSHOT_ID> -->marker and that every finding-derived verdict is grounded in the currentSNAPSHOT_ID. - Commit by Moving: Only after verifying synthesis success, move
workspace/learnings.jsonlto the archive directory:- Ensure the target directory exists (e.g.,
mkdir -p workspace/archive/learnings/). - Determine the loop pass number
Nby reading"pass_number"fromworkspace/.mantis_state.json. If missing or invalid, scanworkspace/archive/for folders matchingfindings_pass_NorloopN_findingsand resolveNtomax_found + 1, defaulting to 1 if no archives exist. - Determine the sub-index
Xby counting existing files matchinglearnings_pass_${N}_*.jsonlinworkspace/archive/learnings/and adding 1. - Move the file:
mv workspace/learnings.jsonl workspace/archive/learnings/learnings_pass_${N}_${X}.jsonl.
- Ensure the target directory exists (e.g.,
- Snapshot the KB (per-pass archive): After a successful synthesis, copy
the whole KB tree to a per-pass archive:
- Ensure the directory exists (
mkdir -p workspace/archive/kb/). - Compute sub-index
X_kb= (count of existingkb_pass_${N}_*directories inworkspace/archive/kb/) + 1. - Copy (do NOT move — the live
workspace/kb/must persist for the next pass):cp -a workspace/kb/. workspace/archive/kb/kb_pass_${N}_${X_kb}/.
- Ensure the directory exists (
- Stamp state: Write
kb_snapshot_id=SNAPSHOT_ID(CURfrom step 0b) intoworkspace/.mantis_state.json. Ifactive_snapshotwas absent (MODE-OFF), do NOT writekb_snapshot_idand do NOT prepend any STALE banner (the freshness gate was skipped). In HALT mode, writekb_snapshot_id=CURand leave the STALE banner inindex.md. - If synthesis fails or is interrupted, leave
workspace/learnings.jsonlintact in its original location to ensure no data is lost. - If
workspace/learnings.jsonlis ABSENT on entry (e.g. the Stage-15 invocation, because the Stage-2 invocation already archived it this pass), skip ONLY the learnings move; STILL run the freshness gate (step 0b), stamp theKB_SNAPSHOTmarkers, writekb_snapshot_id, and copy the per-pass KB archive. KB provenance must be recorded on every invocation.
When complete, notify the user.
Trending
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Who's talking about google/mantis
- Matheus Battisti“O Google lançou uma ferramenta que caça falhas de segurança com IA (Google Mantis)”YouTube · Jul 30, 2026 · 9.2k views
- ☕ Claude Code Cafe“🔒 コードの脆弱性を AI に探させて再現まで確かめる Google のリポジトリで公開された mantis #claude #claudecode”YouTube · Sep 8, 2026 · 647 views
- o0o0o0o“Your Tests Pass. Is Your Code Safe? Google’s AI Security Agents”YouTube · Sep 30, 2026 · 180 views
- ☕️ Claude Code Cafe“🔒 Let an Agent Find Your Security Flaws and Reproduce Them — mantis #claude #claudecode”YouTube · Sep 9, 2026 · 40 views
- 智用AI“Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? #Shorts”YouTube · Sep 10, 2026 · 26 views
The biggest 5 of 46 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 46
Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Bluesky (46 times).
On GitHub · 32
- Oct 30, 2026Design sandboxed agentic bug hunting, RCA, and novel vulnerability discovery — combustrrr/code-analysis-dashboard0 reactions
- Oct 30, 2026Epic: governed scanner and agentic analysis expansion — combustrrr/code-analysis-dashboard0 reactions
- Oct 28, 2026[radar-spike] google/mantis skills — sandbox threat-model (no CI gate) — pablontiv/a4s0 reactions
- Oct 27, 2026google 'mantis' — AI 코딩 에이전트용 취약점 자동 발견·재현·패치 툴킷 (10/26, GitHub) — roomedia/ax-trend0 reactions
- Oct 24, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-22 → 0-unstable-2026-10-24 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
27 more on GitHub
- Oct 23, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-17 → 0-unstable-2026-10-22 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 17, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-16 → 0-unstable-2026-10-17 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 16, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-15 → 0-unstable-2026-10-16 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-14 → 0-unstable-2026-10-15 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 14, 2026feat: SAST — LLM alert triage of CodeQL and Semgrep findings with human sign-off (PR/CI, Advanced) — sparkgeo/github-actions0 reactions
- Oct 14, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-13 → 0-unstable-2026-10-14 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 13, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 52093f7 → 49ab993 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 13, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-05 → 0-unstable-2026-10-13 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 76bf653 → f671cd8 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-10-04 → 0-unstable-2026-10-05 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 30447e1 → f5656dd — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: f48a85e → 30447e1 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-patch (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-meta-agent (critical risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-dedupe (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-threat-model (low risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-history (medium risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-structural-index (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026Update skill: /google-mantis-calibrate (high risk) — aiskillstore/marketplace0 reactions
- Oct 4, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-09-28 → 0-unstable-2026-10-04 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 3, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: 0-unstable-2026-09-18 → 0-unstable-2026-09-28 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Sep 27, 2026agent-skills.github.google.mantis: init at 0-unstable-2026-09-18 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Sep 22, 2026fix(rust): patch parameter bounds validation bugs to avoid panic — morrowc/mrtparser0 reactions
- Sep 22, 2026fix(cpp): add minimal bound checks for packet lengths — morrowc/mrtparser0 reactions
- Sep 11, 2026mode — chogng/ash0 reactions
- Jul 27, 2026Integrate Google Mantis Skills as CRSs — ossf/oss-crs0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 3, 2026Add Google Mantis — agentic AI security review pipeline — ottosulin/awesome-ai-security0 reactions
On YouTube · 9
- Jul 30, 2026O Google lançou uma ferramenta que caça falhas de segurança com IA (Google Mantis) — Matheus Battisti - Hora de Codar9.2k views · 29 comments
- Sep 8, 2026🔒 コードの脆弱性を AI に探させて再現まで確かめる Google のリポジトリで公開された mantis #claude #claudecode — ☕ Claude Code Cafe647 views
- Sep 30, 2026Your Tests Pass. Is Your Code Safe? Google’s AI Security Agents — o0o0o0o180 views
- Sep 9, 2026🔒 Let an Agent Find Your Security Flaws and Reproduce Them — mantis #claude #claudecode — ☕️ Claude Code Cafe40 views
- Sep 10, 2026Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? #Shorts — 智用AIsays it tested it26 views
4 more on YouTube
- Sep 3, 2026今日のAI実用ニュース4選:Slack・Skills・動画理解・WebGPU【9月3日】 — 毎日最速AIニュース21 views
- Sep 10, 2026Mantis:85% Token开销削减,AI漏洞扫描怎么做到的? — 智用AIsays it tested it19 views
- Jul 15, 2026Developer tools and hidden risk & Enterprise agents need real infrastructure - AI News (Jul 15, 2... — The Automated Daily9 views
- Sep 3, 2026Googleの新Skills「Mantis」公開、本番PCで試すな #Shorts — 毎日最速AIニュース5 views
On Bluesky · 5
- Sep 15, 2026Mantis : toolkit open source de Google pour agents de coding, conçu pour trouver, reproduire et corriger des vulnérabilités de façon… — @camilleroux.com3 likes and reposts · 1 reply
- Oct 1, 2026GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously find, reproduce, and patch vulnerabilities.… — @tech-trending.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Sep 23, 2026#ばばさん通信ダイジェスト 賛否関わらず話題になった/なりそうなものを共有しています。 GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously… — @netmarkjp.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Jul 3, 2026Three repos that are leading our path forward in scaling AppSec workflows: 1. github.com/google/mantis 2. github.com/anthropics/d... 3.… — @javanrasokat.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Oct 1, 2026🤖 GitHub - google/mantis: A modular, stack-agnostic toolkit for AI coding agents to autonomously find,... 要約:… — @ai-bs-bot.bsky.social0 likes and reposts · 1 reply
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- mantis-configureSkill
- mantis-launchSkill
- mantis-adviseSkill
- mantis-calibrateSkill
- mantis-chainSkill
- mantis-criticSkill
- mantis-dedupeSkill
- mantis-historySkill
- mantis-meta-agentSkill
- mantis-patchSkill
- mantis-pipeline-adapterSkill
- mantis-planSkill
- mantis-reflectSkill
- mantis-reportSkill
- mantis-reproduceSkill
- mantis-researcherSkill
- mantis-reviewSkill
- mantis-structural-indexSkill
- mantis-summarizeSkill
- mantis-threat-modelSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

