agentleFS
gitt510gitt510/agent-skills/skills/handover/SKILL.md

handover

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Record task or topic progress in a single HANDOVER.md. Use when updating a handover or summarizing work to hand off.

51 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use harness-init, incident and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • steptianSkill

    harness-init

    初始化 .harness 开发框架,集成代码修改影响范围评估和测试覆盖建议功能。触发词:'初始化新项目'、'harness init'、'更新 harness'、'分析影响范围'、'评估修改影响'

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • JkudjoSkill

    incident

    Production incident response — structured triage, hypothesis tree, safe remediation, incident record

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    to-tickets

    Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    caveman

    Ultra-compressed response style that reduces output token count while preserving technical accuracy, with intensity levels and auto-clarity safety rules

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Add <blockers> between state and tasks when something is stuck on an external dependency.

    line 85
  2. Distinctive:

    Must be inside a project directory.

    line 97
  3. Very specific:

    Create or update HANDOVER.md:

    line 116
  4. Distinctive:

    If file exists: re-sort content into the role sections.

    line 118
  5. Distinctive:

    If new file: create with the format above

    line 120
  6. Very specific:

    Update frontmatter updated to today and status to the current one-liner

    line 121
  7. Distinctive:

    Every piece of content lives in exactly one role section

    line 133
  8. Very specific:

    Every task has a verify condition

    line 134
  9. Distinctive:

    Keep language consistent with conversation context (日本語 or English)

    line 135
  10. Distinctive:

    Do NOT include secrets, tokens, passwords, or sensitive credentials

    line 139
  11. Distinctive:

    Do NOT record work that wasn't actually done

    line 140
  12. Distinctive:

    Do NOT treat handover as the single source of truth (SoT remains in issue/ADR)

    line 141
  13. Distinctive:

    Do NOT delete all existing context without tracking/migration path

    line 142
  14. Very specific:

    Use relative paths for cross-references: ../issues/, ../adr/

    line 148

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Handover

Goal: Record task/topic progress in a structured format that allows resuming work across multiple sessions and contexts.

The primary reader is the AI in the next session, not a human. Optimize for action: classify information by role (constraint / decision / state / task / reference), not by narrative. Markdown body with XML tags for section boundaries — tags make scope explicit; md keeps tables/code/lists cheap.

Output path

Save to the project root as HANDOVER.md:

HANDOVER.md
  • Single file at the project root (no subdirectory, no slug)
  • One file per project; overwrite/update in place

File format

---
title: <task/topic title>
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: <one-line: where we are + what remains>
sot: <paths to canonical sources this handover points at>
---

<constraints>

Rules that hold regardless of the task. Violating one breaks the system or
the SoT. State each as an imperative with the failure mode.

</constraints>

<decisions>

Settled. Do not relitigate. Record the rationale with each decision so the
next session does not reopen it.

</decisions>

<state>

What is done and verified (committed, tested, deployed). Facts only.

</state>

<tasks>

Each task is independently actionable and includes its completion check.

<task id="<slug>" priority="1">
What to do, with enough context to start without rereading the file.
constraint: <pointer into constraints, if the task is near a landmine>
verify: <observable condition that means done>
</task>

<task id="<slug>" priority="2" optional="true">
...
</task>

</tasks>

<reference>

Plain facts: tables, commands, paths, device/env identifiers, links to
issues/ADRs (`../issues/`, `../adr/`). Use md tables and code blocks here.

</reference>

Section rules:

  • Omit a section if empty (e.g. no <constraints> yet) — do not leave placeholder text.
  • Add <blockers> between state and tasks when something is stuck on an external dependency.
  • Importance is expressed by section membership, not decoration: no bold for emphasis, no 🔥-style markers. If everything is bold, nothing is.
  • Tasks replace checkbox lists: verify is the checkbox.
  • Tags are delimiters for the model, not validated XML — no escaping needed; md syntax stays as-is inside them.

Workflow

0) Preconditions

  • Must be inside a project directory.

1) Gather context

Review the conversation and existing handover file (if present), then classify each piece of information by role:

  • constraint — must always hold; breaking it damages the system
  • decision — settled choice with rationale
  • state — done and verified
  • task — remaining work, each with a verify condition
  • reference — plain facts (paths, commands, tables, issue/ADR links)

A "learning" from the session is usually a constraint (if it guards future action) or a decision (if it closed an alternative) — file it there, not in a narrative section.

2) Draft handover

Create or update HANDOVER.md:

  • If file exists: re-sort content into the role sections; move completed tasks into state, drop narrative that does not change future action
  • If new file: create with the format above
  • Update frontmatter updated to today and status to the current one-liner

3) Save file

Save as HANDOVER.md at the project root.

Rules

Required

  • Save to HANDOVER.md at project root (invariant path)
  • One file per project (do not split)
  • Every piece of content lives in exactly one role section
  • Every task has a verify condition
  • Keep language consistent with conversation context (日本語 or English)

Prohibited

  • Do NOT include secrets, tokens, passwords, or sensitive credentials
  • Do NOT record work that wasn't actually done
  • Do NOT treat handover as the single source of truth (SoT remains in issue/ADR)
  • Do NOT delete all existing context without tracking/migration path

Related to SoT

  • Handover is for continuity, not as the canonical source of truth
  • Link to related issues/ADRs for authoritative requirements and decisions
  • Use relative paths for cross-references: ../issues/, ../adr/

Trigger hints (JP/EN)

  • JP: handover 更新して
  • JP: 進捗記録して
  • JP: タスク引継ぎまとめて
  • JP: HANDOVER.md に保存して
  • EN: update handover
  • EN: record progress
  • EN: save task handover
  • EN: save to HANDOVER.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.