agentleFS
gitt510gitt510/agent-skills/skills/dads/SKILL.md

dads

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design tokens, components, and usage rules of the Digital Agency Design System (DADS, デジタル庁デザインシステム). Use when output should look DADS-compliant or markup is audited against DADS.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read references/components.md before touching any component.

    line 59

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

DADS — Digital Agency Design System

Knowledge for making output look and behave like the Digital Agency Design System (デジタル庁デザインシステム, DADS) — Japan's government design system, MIT-licensed tokens and components published by digital-go-jp.

Scope: visual authority only

This skill answers one question: what does DADS-compliant look like, and how do I get there from primary sources? It owns colors, typography, component markup, usage rules, and the compliance policy below.

It deliberately does not own structure or medium. Compose it:

  • New artifact → artifact-design (and the Artifact tool's constraints) own the medium; this skill owns the look. See references/artifact.md for where the two collide (CSP, dark theme).
  • Existing frontend restyle → the codebase owns structure; change only what the three-layer check below flags as deviating.

The three-layer model

DADS compliance has three layers. Applying only the first produces "なんちゃって DADS" — colors that look right on markup that an official page would never emit. Real deviations (a table wrapped in a rounded container, a bold chip label) are invisible at the token layer and only surface when compared against official component CSS.

LayerWhat it isHow to get itWhat it buys
tokensvalues — color hex, font, spacing, radius, elevationpinned copy in references/tokens.cssplausible colors
componentsshapes — markup, dimensions, dads-* class namesfetch per references/components.mdcorrect forms
guidelinesrules — when to use whichcurated copies in references/guidelines/correct choices

Work top-down through all three for anything user-facing. Token-only application is acceptable solely for throwaway internal sketches.

Key token values (design-tokens 2.0.1)

The full file is references/tokens.css (226 lines, pinned verbatim). The values that make or break the DADS look:

  • Key color: --color-key-* = blue family; the anchor is blue-900 #0017c1 (the Digital Agency blue).
  • Semantic: error-1 = red-800 #ec0000 / warning-yellow-1 = yellow-700 #b78f00 / success-1 = green-600 #259d63.
  • Font: 'Noto Sans JP', ... — mono is 'Noto Sans Mono'.
  • Body text: 16px, line-height 1.75, letter-spacing 0.02em — omit the letter-spacing and nothing will read as DADS no matter how right the colors are.
  • Heading sizes: 64/57/45/36/32/28/24/20/18/16 (there is no 22).
  • Radius scale: 4/6/8/12/16/24/32/full.

Components

Read references/components.md before touching any component. The one rule worth stating here: port official dads-* class names and CSS verbatim — never transcribe values into homemade classes, or the result can no longer be diffed against the official source when it drifts.

Pick components from references/guidelines/components-index.md (the official catalog). Per-component usage guidelines for the ones already battle-tested (notification-banner, table, heading) plus color/typography foundations are in references/guidelines/.

Policy (always in force)

  • No impersonation. Tokens and components are MIT; the Digital Agency's logo, illustration assets, and name are not part of that grant. Never produce something that reads as an actual Digital Agency page. DADS-styled ≠ Digital-Agency-branded.
  • Label extensions as extensions. Official DADS is light-only (white hardcoded). A dark theme is a DADS-compliant extension, not official DADS — derive it per references/artifact.md and say so in the page footer or equivalent.
  • Attribution for guideline excerpts follows the official notice: https://design.digital.go.jp/dads/introduction/notices/ — each bundled guideline file keeps its source_url frontmatter for this reason.

Refreshing pinned sources

The pins keep this skill reproducible; refresh deliberately, not per-use.

# tokens — check the published version before overwriting the pin (currently 2.0.1)
curl -sL https://unpkg.com/@digital-go-jp/design-tokens@latest/package.json | jq -r .version
curl -sL https://unpkg.com/@digital-go-jp/design-tokens@latest/dist/tokens.css

# guidelines — the ZIP link is dated with no latest-URL; scrape it from the resources page
# (bundled copies are from dads-markdown-20260805.zip)
curl -sL https://design.digital.go.jp/dads/resources/ | grep -oE '/dads/dads-markdown-[0-9]+\.zip'

Components are fetched live (see references/components.md) rather than pinned — the set is large, and live fetch preserves diff-ability against the current official source.

Dead ends (do not revisit)

  • design.digital.go.jp/llms.txt — 404, does not exist.
  • tokens.css at the npm package root — the real file is under dist/; list with https://unpkg.com/@digital-go-jp/design-tokens@latest/?meta first.
  • digital-go-jp/tailwind-theme-plugin — a repackaging of the tokens, zero new information unless the target project already uses Tailwind.
  • components/chip-label guideline — official doc is a "準備中" stub; the porting notes in references/components.md are the best available source.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.