skill-authoring
Skill9 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the operator asks to create, update, import, analyze, or preserve a reusable skill or recurring instruction pattern. Do NOT use for one-off ticket work, ordinary code implementation, problem-catalog incidents, or copying external skill text verbatim.
89 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- neuroborus/agent-runnertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TrueImmortal82/open-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- patrykmurzyn/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- frnkgns/Overgeared-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- notivn/AIEVv2their own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use cloud-api-recipe-authoring, codebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TencentCloudBaseSkillcloud-api-recipe-authoring
Author or revise a cloud-api-operations recipe (config/source/skills/cloud-api-operations/references/recipes/). Encodes why the long tail of control-plane capabilities is deliberately NOT wrapped as MCP/CLI tools, the API-first admission test for whether a capability deserves a recipe, the negative and positive lists, the fixed recipe structure, the writing rules distilled from writing-for-agents, the user-facing copy red lines, and the product regeneration/verification pipeline. Also routes contributors (and their agents) to the contribution flow and the pre-PR self-test protocol in references/contributing.md. Use when adding a recipe, judging whether a scenario belongs in the recipe set, updating the recipes index, re-checking existing recipes against the admission test, or onboarding someone who wants to submit one.
Also in 3 projects that use this
TencentCloudBaseSkillcodebuddy-ide-mcp-upgrade
升级 CodeBuddy IDE(genie 扩展)内置的 CloudBase MCP,以及 MCP 发版时同步 IDE 侧白名单。当用户提到「更新 IDE 里的 MCP」「内置 MCP 版本太老」「IDE 集成的 CloudBase 功能不足」「改工具白名单 toolWhiteList」「把新 bundle 打进 CodeBuddy」「白名单漂移」「MCP 发版要同步什么」时使用。覆盖:解包定位内置 bundle 与内嵌配置、重新构建 mcp bundle、生成新的工具白名单与系统提示词、安全注入 IDE 并备份、用 MCP 协议验证工具清单、人工端到端验收、一键回滚。
Also in 3 projects that use this
DIL8654Skillapi-contract-review
Review ASP.NET Core Web API contracts for HTTP semantics, versioning, backward compatibility, and response consistency. Use when the user asks to review an API, check endpoints, validate REST behavior, or before releasing contract changes.
Also in 5 projects that use this
zaxbysauceSkillpr-review-fix
Codex adapter for addressing pull request review feedback in opencode-swarm. Use when the user asks to fix PR review comments, requested changes, reviewer findings, CI-review notes, or a pasted review summary with low false-positive tolerance.
Also in 3 projects that use this
albertdobmeyerSkillgit-workflows
Advanced git operations beyond add/commit/push. Use when rebasing, bisecting bugs, using worktrees for parallel development, recovering with reflog, managing subtrees/submodules, resolving merge conflicts, cherry-picking across branches, or working with monorepos.
Also in 3 projects that use this
rogue-dev-studioSkillfrontend-engineering
Expert frontend application engineering: accessible UI structure, state and data-fetching discipline, form/validation UX, responsive layouts, performance budgets, and integration with API contracts. Use when building or refining SPA/web screens, design-system consumption, client-side routing, or fixing UI reliability (loading, empty, and error states).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from TencentCloudBase
Other versions89 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 89
- nyldn/claude-octopus★ 4.4ksame name
- endurain-project/endurain★ 2.4ksame name
- joaovitoriasilva/endurain★ 2.4ksame name
- theopenco/llmgateway★ 1.7ksame name
- TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-ToolKit★ 1.2ksame name
- TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-MCP★ 1.2ksame name
- TencentCloudBase/CloudBase-AI-Toolkit★ 1.2ksame name
- pockebot/openpocket★ 847same name
- QuixiAI/agi-memory★ 623same name
- QuixiAI/Hexis★ 623same name
79 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository119 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/fusebase-flow-always.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fusebase-flow-implementation.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fusebase-flow-security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fusebase-flow-specs.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fusebase-flow-validation.mdcCursor rule
- api-explorationSkill
- app-api-contract-testingSkill
- app-backendSkill
- app-business-docsSkill
- app-dev-practicesSkill
- app-e2e-testsSkill
- app-quality-patternsSkill
- app-routingSkill
- app-secretsSkill
- app-sidecarSkill
- app-ui-designSkill
- business-logic-guardianSkill
- client-vs-internalSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- comment-policySkill
- communicationSkill
- design-discovery-ideationSkill
- dev-debug-logsSkill
- documentation-budgetSkill
- file-uploadSkill
- find-wasted-codeSkill
- find-wasted-effortSkill
- fusebase-cliSkill
- fusebase-dashboardsSkill
- fusebase-flow-health-checkSkill
- fusebase-gateSkill
- fusebase-portal-specific-appsSkill
- git-history-diagnosticSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- handling-authentication-errorsSkill
- handoffSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- invite-with-passwordSkill
- lightweight-laneSkill
- liveness-disciplineSkill
- managed-integrationsSkill
- mcp-gate-debugSkill
- module-size-disciplineSkill
- north-starSkill
- phase-auditSkill
- product-apps-decompositionSkill
- product-docs-firstSkill
- product-ownerSkill
- project-onboardingSkill
- release-deploy-reportingSkill
- remote-logsSkill
- repo-onboarding-context-mapSkill
- requirements-specificationSkill
- role-disciplineSkill
- security-permissions-reviewSkill
- smoke-testingSkill
- task-delegationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.
19
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Create or update skills without skill sprawl, role drift, mirror drift, or license contamination.
- Distinctive: line 72
Default to updating an existing skill when overlap is material.
- Distinctive: line 78
Read only to identify capabilities, triggers, constraints, failure modes, and reusable checks.
- Distinctive: line 79
Do not copy paragraphs, example blocks, proprietary labels, vendor-specific paths, or exact output formats.
- Distinctive: line 81
Remove prohibited or irrelevant brand terms before writing repo files.
- Distinctive: line 82
Write a short comparison table: existing Fusebase skill overlap, new capability, recommended role.
- Distinctive: line 95
If role ownership is unclear, stop and ask in chat text with 2-3 options.
- Very specific: line 99
Use templates/skill-template.md section order.
- Distinctive: line 151
If validation cannot run, report the exact missing check and treat the change as incomplete until the operator accepts that gap.
- Distinctive: line 224
If the operator wants a new framework skill but overlap is unclear, ask for approval in chat text with an options table: update existing …
- Distinctive: line 225
If the skill changes hooks, policies, or workflow semantics, escalate to Architect review before implementation.
- Distinctive: line 226
If implementation touches provider mirrors or manifests, hand to AI Developer for canonical edit + mirror regeneration.
- Distinctive: line 227
If clean-room status cannot be established, stop and request a concept summary instead of using the source text.
- Distinctive: line 246
Do not copy external skill prose, example blocks, or proprietary labels.
- Very specific: line 247
Do not write directly to .agents/skills/ or .claude/skills/ as the source of truth.
- Very specific: line 248
Do not promote CLI provider assets into canonical flow-skills/ without a separate clean-room proposal and non-overlap analysis.
- Distinctive: line 249
Do not add a new skill when a narrow update to an existing skill covers the behavior.
- Distinctive: line 250
Do not use a skill for a one-off bug that belongs in the problem catalog.
- Distinctive: line 251
Do not make Product Owner sessions implement code or AI Developer sessions lock product decisions.
- Distinctive: line 252
Do not ask skill-authoring questions through popup / clickable menus.
- Distinctive: line 253
Do not leave mirrors, manifests, counts, or release docs stale after adding a framework skill.
- Distinctive: line 254
Do not change a skill's trigger/gate in one section and leave any other § Retrofit-hygiene sweep surface on the old gate — that section …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill Authoring
Style: Mode-B-lite. Clean-room, Fusebase-specific procedure for deciding, writing, wiring, and validating reusable skills.
Purpose
Create or update skills without skill sprawl, role drift, mirror drift, or license contamination. This skill governs reusable instruction capture: what deserves a skill, where it belongs, which role uses it, and what validation proves it was authored cleanly.
When to invoke
- Operator asks to create, update, install, import, compare, or analyze a skill.
- Operator provides an external skill, prompt, guide, or workflow and asks to reproduce similar capability in Fusebase Flow.
- A recurring pattern should become durable reusable expertise.
- Existing skill behavior needs tightening after a missed bug, failed handoff, or repeated role drift.
- A framework skill is added or changed and provider mirrors/manifests must stay in sync.
Do not invoke when
- The request is normal per-ticket implementation covered by
implementation-planning,validation-and-qa, or another domain skill. - The issue is a one-off failure with a concrete cause; file
docs/problem-catalog/<slug>/problem.mdinstead. - The operator wants to copy external text verbatim. Refuse copying and offer clean-room capability extraction.
- The topic is already covered by an existing skill and only needs normal use, not authoring or update.
- A provider mirror is the only target. Canonical skill edits start in
flow-skills/(framework) ordocs/skills/(project-local); mirrors are generated or deliberately promoted.
Required inputs
| Input | Where it lives | If missing |
| Operator request | chat | Stop; skill purpose depends on requested reuse |
| Candidate source material | attachment, repo file, operator summary, or observed repeated pattern | Proceed only from available concepts; do not invent missing domain rules |
| Existing skill catalog | flow-skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, docs/skills/README.md | Search before adding; avoid duplicate skills |
| CLI edition map, for CLI provider assets | docs/fusebase-cli-edition.md | Treat provider assets as domain support, not canonical Flow skills |
| Skill substrate | templates/skill-template.md | Stop; use the canonical section order |
| Role boundaries | FLOW_RULES.md, flow-skills/role-discipline/references/<role>.md, agents/*/AGENT.md | Stop if role ownership cannot be assigned |
| Clean-room constraints | docs/source-map.md, docs/clean-room.md | Treat external material as concept-only |
| Mirror process | hooks/local/mirror-skills.sh, audit/skill-mirror-manifest.txt | Required for framework skill changes |
Procedure
1. Classify the reusable knowledge
| If the pattern is... | Destination | Owner |
| Useful to every Fusebase Flow project and description-matchable by agents | flow-skills/<slug>/SKILL.md | Framework change; PO defines, AI Developer implements |
| Fusebase Apps CLI runtime/domain guidance already present in provider assets | .agents/skills/<slug>/ and .claude/skills/<slug>/ | Provider asset; reference from Flow artifacts, do not duplicate |
| Specific to one target project after 3+ repeated uses | docs/skills/<slug>/SKILL.md | Product Owner / project team |
| A one-off incident, outage, or diagnostic lesson | docs/problem-catalog/<slug>/problem.md | Product Owner |
| A one-ticket design or architecture choice | docs/specs/<slug>/decisions.md | Product Owner / Architect |
| Already covered by an existing skill | Update that skill or leave unchanged | Depends on owning role |
Default to updating an existing skill when overlap is material. Add a new framework skill only when the trigger, procedure, failure modes, and role boundary are distinct.
2. Extract capability clean-room
For external material:
- Read only to identify capabilities, triggers, constraints, failure modes, and reusable checks.
- Do not copy paragraphs, example blocks, proprietary labels, vendor-specific paths, or exact output formats.
- Replace product/tool-specific assumptions with Fusebase Flow concepts: role, phase, artifact path, workflow, skill, policy, hook, mirror.
- Remove prohibited or irrelevant brand terms before writing repo files.
- Write a short comparison table: existing Fusebase skill overlap, new capability, recommended role.
The authorized MIT import documented at docs/source-map.md#karpathy-guidelines is a narrow exception to this skill's no-copy instructions and clean-room metadata requirements; preserve its license notice. Other imports remain concept-only.
3. Assign role applicability
| Role | Allowed authoring responsibility |
| Product Owner | Decide whether a skill is needed; classify framework vs project skill; define trigger, purpose, acceptance criteria, role applicability, and non-overlap |
| Architect | Review skill design when it changes role boundaries, workflows, hooks, provider compatibility, or broad framework semantics |
| AI Developer | Implement approved skill edits; update canonical files; regenerate mirrors; run validation; report evidence |
| Deploy phase | No skill authoring; may surface post-deploy lessons for PO curation |
If role ownership is unclear, stop and ask in chat text with 2-3 options; do not use popup / clickable menus.
4. Author the skill
Use templates/skill-template.md section order. Keep the body Mode-B-lite:
| Section | Requirement |
| Frontmatter | name, trigger-rich description, source_inspiration: conceptual-only, license_status: clean-room-original, version, risk, invocation, outputs, workflows, hooks |
| Purpose | 1-3 sentences; why this exists separately |
| When to invoke | concrete triggers the matcher/operator can recognize |
| Do not invoke when | negative triggers to prevent sprawl |
| Required inputs | table with location and fallback |
| Procedure | numbered or role-scoped steps |
| Worked example | procedure-heavy skills only: one compact example (≤12 lines) after Procedure — input → step outcomes → output |
| Output artifacts | paths and chat/artifact mode |
| Failure cases | detection and response |
| Escalation path | next skill/workflow/operator question |
| Anti-patterns | things the skill must not do |
| Clean-room note | standard Fusebase attestation |
Move long examples or variant-specific detail into references/ only when needed. Do not create README, quick-reference, changelog, or other auxiliary files inside a skill folder.
5. Wire framework skills
For flow-skills/<slug>/SKILL.md changes, check whether each surface needs an update:
| Surface | Update when |
flow-skills/role-discipline/references/<role>.md | role don't-list or refusal phrasing changes (shared protocols: flow-skills/role-discipline/SKILL.md) |
agents/product-owner/AGENT.md | PO / Architect should load or invoke the skill |
agents/ai-developer/AGENT.md | AI Developer / Deploy phase should load or invoke the skill |
workflows/*.md | a workflow creates, consumes, or validates the skill |
templates/*.md | generated artifacts need fields from the skill |
README.md, docs/framework.md, docs/compatibility.md, docs/source-map.md | skill counts, catalog, compatibility, or attestation counts change |
CHANGELOG.md, docs/release-notes/<version>.md | release-visible capability changes |
Then run hooks/local/mirror-skills.sh and, if agent files changed, hooks/local/mirror-agents.sh.
6. Validate
Minimum validation for framework skill changes:
| Check | Expected |
| Mirror integrity | canonical skill hash matches .agents/skills/ and .claude/skills/; manifest regenerated |
| Agent mirror integrity | canonical agent hash matches .claude/agents/ and .codex/agents/ if agents changed |
| Source-leak scan | no external/prohibited names, copied phrases, or vendor-specific paths introduced |
| Count scan | no stale skill-count references after adding/removing framework skills |
| CLI provider boundary | provider CLI assets remain outside canonical flow-skills/ unless separately approved as clean-room Flow framework skills |
| Format check | git diff --check clean except known line-ending warnings |
| Scope review | no unrelated refactors or duplicated skill responsibilities |
| Retrofit hygiene | on any trigger/gate change: propagation sweep clean — grep for each pre-change trigger phrase / artifact path returns 0 unexplained hits in the skill (see Retrofit-hygiene sweep below) |
| Matcher dry-run | on new skills / description changes: own description keyword-claims each of its 3-5 trigger phrases and none of its named siblings' phrases against the full description catalog (see Matcher dry-run below) |
| Worked example | procedure-heavy skill (Procedure with 3+ steps or a decision table) contains exactly one compact ## Worked example (≤12 lines) |
If validation cannot run, report the exact missing check and treat the change as incomplete until the operator accepts that gap.
Retrofit-hygiene sweep (mandatory on any trigger/gate change)
A trigger/gate change = any edit to when the skill fires, what artifact gates it, which inputs it accepts, or which role owns it. Partial retrofits create self-contradicting skills; ALL surfaces update in the SAME edit:
| Surface | Must reflect the new trigger/gate |
Frontmatter description | "Use when / ONLY when" names the new trigger/artifact set; no stale names |
| Header style line + Purpose | gating statement matches the new set |
| When to invoke / Do not invoke when | positive and negative triggers updated symmetrically |
| Required inputs | rows and "If missing" behavior accept the new set |
| Procedure | every step — especially existence/first-step gates — checks the new set |
| Failure cases + Escalation path | detection, response, and referenced artifacts use the new set |
| External restatements | sibling skills, README catalog, AGENTS.md overlay, agents/*/AGENT.md lines quoting this trigger |
Mechanical check: for each pre-change trigger phrase / artifact path, grep -n '<old-string>' flow-skills/<slug>/SKILL.md → 0 hits, or every remaining hit is deliberate and explained in the change evidence.
Anti-example (real): business-logic-guardian v3.5 was retrofitted to accept business-logic-index.md in "When to invoke", but frontmatter description, Required inputs, Procedure step 1, and Escalation still gated on business-logic.md only — the skill no-opped on projects holding only the index and contradicted its own body. This sweep exists to make that class impossible.
Matcher dry-run (mandatory on new skills and description changes)
| Step | Action | Pass condition |
| 1 | List 3-5 operator phrases this skill claims (from description + When to invoke) | — |
| 2 | Dump the catalog: grep -H '^description:' flow-skills/*/SKILL.md. Per own phrase: (a) confirm THIS skill's description contains the phrase's 1-2 distinctive keywords — absent keywords = phrase never fires; (b) scan every other description for those keywords — any that also plausibly claims the phrase = COLLISION | every own phrase keyword-present in own description; every collision resolved: add an explicit "<sibling> owns that" Do-NOT clause here or narrow the trigger |
| 3 | List 2-3 phrases owned by the nearest siblings (skills named in this skill's "Do NOT use" line or Do-not-invoke section) | own description claims NONE of their keywords (step 2b scan, reversed) |
| 4 | Record the phrase → winning-skill table in change evidence (chat or gate note) | table present |
Any keyword-absent own phrase, unresolved collision, or claimed sibling phrase → fix description / Do-not-invoke boundaries BEFORE running mirror-skills.sh.
Worked-example requirement
Every procedure-heavy skill — Procedure with 3+ steps or a decision table — carries exactly ONE ## Worked example after Procedure: ≤12 lines, Mode-B-lite, concrete input → key step outcomes → produced artifact. One example, not a tutorial; variant detail goes to references/ only if genuinely needed. Applies to new skills at authoring time and to any existing skill on its next material update — no mass retro-edit of untouched skills.
Worked example
Request: "guardian should also accept the new index doc" — a trigger/gate change to an existing framework skill.
- Classify (§1): update existing
business-logic-guardian; no new skill. - Author (§4): add
business-logic-index.mdto the activation gate. - Retrofit sweep (§6):
grep -n 'business-logic\.md' flow-skills/business-logic-guardian/SKILL.md→ update frontmatterdescription, When/Do-not-invoke, Required inputs, Procedure step 1, Escalation in the SAME edit; 0 unexplained stale hits. - Matcher dry-run (§6): "don't break the business logic" → guardian wins; "document the business logic" →
app-business-docsstill wins. - Wire + mirror (§5):
hooks/local/mirror-skills.sh; manifest regenerated.
Evidence: sweep greps + dry-run table in the gate note.
Output artifacts
| Artifact | Path or location | Mode |
| Skill analysis / recommendation | chat | Mode A |
| Framework skill | flow-skills/<slug>/SKILL.md | Mode-B-lite |
| Project skill | docs/skills/<slug>/SKILL.md | Mode-B-lite |
| Problem-catalog alternative | docs/problem-catalog/<slug>/problem.md | Mode B |
| Mirror manifest | audit/skill-mirror-manifest.txt | generated |
| Agent mirror manifest | audit/agent-mirror-manifest.txt | generated when agents change |
Failure cases
| Failure mode | Detection | Response |
| Duplicate skill | Existing skill has same trigger/procedure | Update existing skill or recommend no change |
| External text copied | Source-leak scan or review finds copied prose/examples | Replace with clean-room rewrite before claiming done |
| Wrong location | Project-specific skill added under flow-skills/, or framework skill placed only under docs/skills/ | Move to correct surface and update references |
| Mirror drift | Preflight/hash check finds mirror mismatch | Run mirror script and re-check |
| Role drift | PO writes production code via skill, or AI Developer changes product direction | Stop; apply role-discipline refusal and re-scope |
| Overlong skill | SKILL.md grows toward large reference-guide size | Split variant detail into references/ and keep SKILL.md procedural |
| Stale retrofit | retrofit-hygiene sweep finds a section still describing the pre-change trigger/gate | propagate in the same edit; re-sweep to 0 stale hits before mirroring |
| Trigger collision | matcher dry-run finds a keyword-absent own phrase, an unresolved description collision, or a claimed sibling phrase | rewrite description / Do-not-invoke boundary; re-run dry-run |
Escalation path
- If the operator wants a new framework skill but overlap is unclear, ask for approval in chat text with an options table: update existing skill, create new skill, or file project skill.
- If the skill changes hooks, policies, or workflow semantics, escalate to Architect review before implementation.
- If implementation touches provider mirrors or manifests, hand to AI Developer for canonical edit + mirror regeneration.
- If clean-room status cannot be established, stop and request a concept summary instead of using the source text.
Domain-expert skill mode
Use when the operator wants a skill that makes the agent an expert in a specific product area / industry (e.g. dental clinics, legal intake, fitness) so app work uses best-practice patterns and known market-solution categories instead of reinventing the wheel. The produced skill is project-local (lives under the project's own skill area, not Flow canonical flow-skills/, and is not mirrored or added to the Flow manifest) and is input-dependent — it needs the operator's domain + any research they supply.
| Step | Action |
| 1. Confirm need | A real, repeated domain — not a one-off ticket. One domain = one skill. |
| 2. Gather inputs | Operator's vision + research dropped at docs/<app>/research/. The agent does NOT invent domain facts. |
| 3. Scope the expertise | Domain vocabulary, standard workflows, common entities/data, regulatory/trust constraints, typical client-vs-internal needs. |
| 4. Market awareness | List the categories of established solutions so the agent reuses proven patterns — never copy competitor names, prose, code, or licensed assets (clean-room). |
| 5. Author | Follow templates/skill-template.md; description leads with the domain triggers; cite where each domain fact came from. |
| 6. Place (do NOT mirror) | Project-local domain skill, not Flow canonical. Do not run mirror-skills.sh for it; do not add it to audit/skill-mirror-manifest.txt. |
The authoring method here is generic (ships with Flow); the produced domain skill is project-specific and absent by default.
Anti-patterns
- Do not copy external skill prose, example blocks, or proprietary labels.
- Do not write directly to
.agents/skills/or.claude/skills/as the source of truth. - Do not promote CLI provider assets into canonical
flow-skills/without a separate clean-room proposal and non-overlap analysis. - Do not add a new skill when a narrow update to an existing skill covers the behavior.
- Do not use a skill for a one-off bug that belongs in the problem catalog.
- Do not make Product Owner sessions implement code or AI Developer sessions lock product decisions.
- Do not ask skill-authoring questions through popup / clickable menus; use chat text per FR-19.
- Do not leave mirrors, manifests, counts, or release docs stale after adding a framework skill.
- Do not change a skill's trigger/gate in one section and leave any other § Retrofit-hygiene sweep surface on the old gate — that section owns the ONLY surface list (never re-enumerate it elsewhere); run the sweep in the same edit or do not ship.
Clean-room note
Original Fusebase Flow content. Designed after reviewing public AI coding workflow patterns; no third-party code, prompts, skill files, or hook scripts are copied. See docs/source-map.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

