agentleFS
fusebase-devfusebase-dev/fusebase-flow/.agents/skills/dev-debug-logs/SKILL.md

dev-debug-logs

Skill9 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when debugging an app through `fusebase dev start`, or when you need to inspect browser logs, proxied API traffic, frontend dev server output, or backend output captured by the local CLI. Explains where logs are written and which file to inspect for each symptom. This is for LOCAL DEVELOPMENT only - for deployed apps, use the remote-logs skill instead.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

25 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 17 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 17

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When an app is run through:

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when debugging the local app runtime.

    line 29
  3. Distinctive:

    If the app defines a dedicated backend dev command, the CLI captures that process directly

    line 75
  4. Very specific:

    If frontend and backend are started together from one dev.command using tools like concurrently, the CLI attempts to capture the backend …

    line 76
  5. Very specific:

    Use requestId to correlate request and response records for one /api call

    line 98
  6. Very specific:

    If the app uses a dedicated backend via app.backend.dev.command, this file contains the app dev server output directly

    line 117
  7. Very specific:

    If frontend and backend are started together from one dev.command using tools like concurrently, the CLI attempts to exclude the detected …

    line 118
  8. Very specific:

    If the browser error looks related to Vite, module resolution, HMR, or frontend dev proxying, check frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl

    line 126
  9. Very specific:

    If the browser error came from a failed /api call, inspect access-logs.jsonl and then check backend-logs.jsonl around the same time if a …

    line 127
  10. Very specific:

    Start with browser-logs.jsonl to confirm the browser-visible symptom

    line 131
  11. Very specific:

    Check access-logs.jsonl to correlate the request and response or a proxy error

    line 132
  12. Very specific:

    Check frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl if the frontend dev server may be failing to proxy or compile

    line 133
  13. Distinctive:

    Check whether the backend printed startup errors, missing env vars, port conflicts, or stack traces

    line 139
  14. Very specific:

    If the browser is only showing a generic fetch failure, confirm the browser-visible symptom in browser-logs.jsonl

    line 140
  15. Distinctive:

    When a PostgreSQL-backed feature fails early, use this order before changing code:

    line 144
  16. Very specific:

    check browser-logs.jsonl and access-logs.jsonl

    line 148
  17. Very specific:

    call GET /v4/api/proxy/gate-service/v1/me with the current x-app-feature-token

    line 150
  18. Distinctive:

    verify identity, scopes, and effective permissions

    line 151
  19. Very specific:

    call listIsolatedStores for the current orgId

    line 153
  20. Very specific:

    if the store is app-scoped, verify the exact clientId / source scope match

    line 154
  21. Very specific:

    Use fusebase dev start; do not bypass the CLI with direct npm run dev if you need these logs

    line 165
  22. Very specific:

    Read the latest session directory under the selected app directory's logs/dev-<timestamp>/ for the current run

    line 166
  23. Very specific:

    Vite watch: Add server.watch.ignored: ['/logs/'] to the app's vite.config.ts so log writes don't trigger HMR reloads (see skill …

    line 167
  24. Distinctive:

    Treat logs as debug artifacts, not as a source of truth for business data

    line 168
  25. Distinctive:

    Do not assume secrets are fully removed.

    line 169

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Dev Debug Logs

Important: This skill is for local development only. For logs from deployed app backends, use the remote-logs skill with fusebase remote-logs command.

When an app is run through:

fusebase dev start FEATURE_PATH

the CLI creates a per-session log directory inside the selected app directory:

<app-dir>/logs/dev-<timestamp>/

with these files:

  • browser-logs.jsonl
  • access-logs.jsonl
  • backend-logs.jsonl
  • frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl

Use this skill when debugging the local app runtime. These logs are local development artifacts only.

Which Log File To Read

browser-logs.jsonl

Use for:

  • console.log / console.error output from the browser
  • uncaught browser errors
  • unhandled promise rejections
  • navigation/lifecycle events from the app page

Important:

  • It only works when the app is opened through the CLI proxy started by fusebase dev start
  • The CLI injects a browser debug script into proxied HTML pages automatically
  • Records are JSON Lines; each line is one event

Typical fields:

  • timestamp
  • type
  • level
  • message
  • args
  • error
  • url
  • pathname

backend-logs.jsonl

Use for:

  • backend stdout/stderr captured during fusebase dev start
  • runtime errors printed by an app backend
  • startup messages like port binding, env/config issues, and stack traces

Typical fields:

  • timestamp
  • appId
  • line

Important:

  • If the app defines a dedicated backend dev command, the CLI captures that process directly
  • If frontend and backend are started together from one dev.command using tools like concurrently, the CLI attempts to capture the backend lane into this file as well
  • This file is line-based output, not structured request logs

access-logs.jsonl

Use for:

  • requests made to /api through the local proxy
  • request/response headers
  • request/response bodies for small JSON/text payloads
  • proxy failures between the CLI and the app/frontend dev server

Typical record types:

  • request
  • response
  • proxy-error

Important:

  • Records include requestId
  • The same request ID is also forwarded as x-fusebase-dev-request-id
  • Use requestId to correlate request and response records for one /api call
  • Headers and obvious secrets are redacted before writing

frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl

Use for:

  • frontend dev server stdout/stderr captured during fusebase dev start
  • Vite startup errors, port-binding issues, and plugin/build diagnostics printed by the frontend dev server
  • frontend-side dev proxy messages emitted by the app dev server

Typical fields:

  • timestamp
  • appId
  • line

Important:

  • If the app uses a dedicated backend via app.backend.dev.command, this file contains the app dev server output directly
  • If frontend and backend are started together from one dev.command using tools like concurrently, the CLI attempts to exclude the detected backend lane from this file
  • This file is line-based output, not structured browser events

How To Use These Logs Together

For frontend/UI issues:

  • Start with browser-logs.jsonl
  • If the browser error looks related to Vite, module resolution, HMR, or frontend dev proxying, check frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl
  • If the browser error came from a failed /api call, inspect access-logs.jsonl and then check backend-logs.jsonl around the same time if a backend exists

For /api failures seen in the UI:

  • Start with browser-logs.jsonl to confirm the browser-visible symptom
  • Check access-logs.jsonl to correlate the request and response or a proxy error
  • Check frontend-dev-server-logs.jsonl if the frontend dev server may be failing to proxy or compile
  • Then inspect backend-logs.jsonl for the corresponding backend-side error or startup issue

For backend startup failures:

  • Start with backend-logs.jsonl
  • Check whether the backend printed startup errors, missing env vars, port conflicts, or stack traces
  • If the browser is only showing a generic fetch failure, confirm the browser-visible symptom in browser-logs.jsonl

Quick runbook: CORS vs NotFound for Gate/PostgreSQL flows

When a PostgreSQL-backed feature fails early, use this order before changing code:

  1. Preflight / OPTIONS
    • confirm whether the browser is failing on CORS/preflight before the real request
    • check browser-logs.jsonl and access-logs.jsonl
  2. Gate /me token context
    • call GET /v4/api/proxy/gate-service/v1/me with the current x-app-feature-token
    • verify identity, scopes, and effective permissions
  3. Store discovery
    • call listIsolatedStores for the current orgId
    • if the store is app-scoped, verify the exact clientId / source scope match
  4. Only then change app code

Heuristic:

  • preflight/CORS failure -> host/origin/config issue
  • valid /me + empty store list -> org/source-scope/config issue
  • valid /me + visible store + failing data call -> then inspect feature code / SDK args

Rules

  • Use fusebase dev start; do not bypass the CLI with direct npm run dev if you need these logs
  • Read the latest session directory under the selected app directory's logs/dev-<timestamp>/ for the current run
  • Vite watch: Add server.watch.ignored: ['**/logs/**'] to the app's vite.config.ts so log writes don't trigger HMR reloads (see skill app-dev-practices)
  • Treat logs as debug artifacts, not as a source of truth for business data
  • Do not assume secrets are fully removed; redaction is best-effort

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.