performance-review
Skill7 starsChanged 23 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Find real performance problems using measurement instead of speculation. Use when performance is reported as an issue, the user asks for optimization, a review spots potentially expensive behavior, or a change is suspected of causing a measurable slowdown. Owns cross-stack methodology for caching, N+1 behavior, and resource leaks; use `frontend-review` for render performance and `database-review` for query cost.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Smaui94/ClaudeSkillCollectiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- flopperj/dotfiles-coretheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- nledford/engineering-review-boardtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- saypage-ai/saypage-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ci-cd-pipeline.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nanvixSkillci-cd-pipeline
Guide for Nanvix CI and GitHub Actions workflow behavior, including local pipeline execution and matrix coverage. Use this when asked about CI checks, workflow failures, or release flow.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- genspark-ai/genoffice★ 12ksame name
- microsoft/intelligent-terminal★ 2.2ksame name
- borgbase/vykar★ 722same name
- ShipSecAI/studio★ 380same name
- nledford/engineering-review-board★ 11same name
- bis-code/claude-toolkit★ 8same name
- Sagargupta16/agent-recipes★ 4same name
- vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai★ 4same name
- aiimpactagency/social-media-team★ 3same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/gentjin.mdcCursor rule
- api-designSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- backend-reviewSkill
- cleanupSkill
- compactionSkill
- database-reviewSkill
- dependency-reviewSkill
- deployment-readinessSkill
- frontend-reviewSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- integration-reviewSkill
- knowledge-vaultSkill
- project-conventionsSkill
- refactoring-migrationSkill
- reportingSkill
- requirements-reviewSkill
- review-orchestratorSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- skill-authoringSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-strategySkill
- work-in-progressSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.