migrate
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Migrate a published Webflow site to Sanity. Use when the user asks to migrate a site by URL or resume an existing migration.
65 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nazmirket/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- tuist/agent-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jwm-axoni/claude-workbenchtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraphtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use incident, sdd and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JkudjoSkillincident
Production incident response — structured triage, hypothesis tree, safe remediation, incident record
Also in 4 projects that use this
liatrio-labsSkillsdd
Execute the Liatrio Spec-Driven Development (SDD) workflow when explicitly invoked by the user. NOTE: this skill is NOT intended to be dynamically loaded or automatically triggered; it should only ever be explicitly called by the user.
Also in 4 projects that use this
BerryKuipersSkillscaffold
Detect project stack, apply architecture patterns, wire quality gates, and scaffold features. Use when bootstrapping a project, adding a vertical slice, wiring CI/CD, adding Docker compose, or setting up quality gates.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinit
Also in 8 projects that use this
agenticnotetakingSkillupgrade
Apply plugin knowledge base updates to an existing generated system. Consults the Ars Contexta research graph for methodology improvements, proposes skill upgrades with research justification. Never auto-implements. Triggers on "/upgrade", "upgrade skills", "check for improvements", "update methodology".
Also in 3 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillcheckpoint
Save a checkpoint of task status, decisions, active files, and next steps
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions65 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- focusreactive/framer-to-payload-migration★ 097% same
- focusreactive/framer-to-sanity-migration★ 098% same
Wrote their own version · 63
- garrytan/gbrain★ 33ksame name
- tuist/tuist★ 5.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- dsifry/metaswarm★ 432same name
- pipecat-ai/gradient-bang★ 420same name
- govctl-org/govctl★ 276same name
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84same name
53 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 51 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
If a script fails, the fix is another script run with better input — never a hand-edit of project files.
- Very specific: line 66
Read manifest.steps ({ [stepId]: { status, error?
- Very specific: line 73
When every applicable step is done, the pipeline is complete.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 51 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/migrate
This skill drives the migration pipeline directly: it resolves project
state by reading .migration/, then runs each stage's script in a fixed order.
Hard rule: scripts own writes, the skill owns orchestration
- The skill reads state directly with the Read tool:
.migration/manifest.json,.migration/run-config.json, and.migration/artifacts/*.json. These are the source of truth. - The skill never writes under
.migration/by hand. Every state change runs a real script (src/scripts/**/index.ts) via Bash. - If a script fails, the fix is another script run with better input — never a hand-edit of project files. See the read-only rule below.
Hard rule: the tool repo is read-only, and the run is yours to finish
A migration run never modifies this repository. Not src/, not tests/,
not configs (package.json, migrate.config.json, playwright-mcp.json,
.mcp.json), not docs/, not this skill. No edits, no new files, no git
subcommand that touches the tree (add, commit, stash, checkout,
reset, clean, restore). Read the tool source as much as you like —
write nothing outside <projectPath>.
Hit a problem? Solve it yourself, inside the run. A failing script, a
rejected payload, a stuck lane, a tool bug you just diagnosed — none of these
is a reason to patch the repo, and none is a reason to stop and hand the
problem back to the user. Find the way forward with what the pipeline already
gives you: re-read the failing script's own error list and author a corrected
payload; re-run the step; narrow or widen scope; restart replay/harness or
take a free MCP lane; or record what is still open, mark it for review and move
on. Then keep going to the next step.
Found a real tool bug? Write it down and route around it. Collect such findings and report them once the run is finished — fixing the tool is separate work, in a separate session, on a clean tree.
The pipeline
Phases, in the order the skill runs them:
| phase | link |
init-project | phases/init-project/PHASE.md |
probe | phases/probe/PHASE.md |
detect | phases/detect/PHASE.md |
inventory | phases/inventory/PHASE.md |
snapshot | phases/snapshot/PHASE.md |
assets | phases/assets/PHASE.md |
design-tokens | phases/design-tokens/PHASE.md |
discovery | phases/discovery/PHASE.md |
synth | phases/synth/PHASE.md |
layout | phases/layout/PHASE.md |
generate | phases/generate/PHASE.md |
Determining the next step
One thing is not a manifest step: init-project --prepare, which computes the
RunConfig.
Read manifest.steps ({ [stepId]: { status, error? } }, status one of
pending/running/done/failed). Walk "The pipeline" table in order; the
first step not done is the next one — failed means it failed before (warn,
then retry), running means it was interrupted (retry). Open that step's phase
doc and follow it; the phase doc owns its own step ids, commands, --force
semantics and internal loops. Never plan a step from this file alone.
When every applicable step is done, the pipeline is complete.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

