sdd-status
Skill36 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Explicit command-style skill for inspecting .ai/sdd state and recommending the next safe action. Use only when the user explicitly asks for SDD status, progress, blockers, readiness, or next action. Do not auto-load for general SDD work; do not create specs or implement code.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Use package-level templates/sdd-index.md as the dashboard reference when useful.
- Very specific: line 21
Treat .ai/strategy/handoff/strategy-brief.md as optional upstream context and .ai/sdd/handoff/sdd-brief.md as optional downstream handoff …
- Very specific: line 24
Check whether .ai/sdd/ exists.
- Very specific: line 25
Check .ai/sdd/INDEX.md if present.
- Very specific: line 27
Check .ai/strategy/handoff/strategy-brief.md if present and report it as an available upstream handoff.
- Very specific: line 28
Check .ai/sdd/handoff/sdd-brief.md if present and report its readiness/status summary.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not modify files.
- Distinctive: line 50
If an index or status appears stale, recommend an update instead of editing it.
- Distinctive: line 92
Prefer short dashboards over long commentary.
- Very specific: line 93
Do not infer approvals from file existence.
- Very specific: line 96
When a strategy handoff exists but no SDD artifacts exist, recommend /skill:sdd-plan or /skill:sdd-prd depending on scope.
- Very specific: line 97
When tasks are approved but sdd-brief.md is missing or stale, recommend refreshing the SDD handoff.
- Distinctive: line 101
Do not create, edit, or delete files in this skill.
- Distinctive: line 102
Do not approve drafts.
- Distinctive: line 103
Do not implement code.
- Distinctive: line 104
Do not run expensive verification commands unless the user explicitly asks for a health check.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SDD Status
Inspect the SDD workspace and report current progress, blockers, and next actions.
Purpose
STATUS gives operational visibility across .ai/sdd/ without changing artifacts. It helps the user understand what exists, what is approved, what is still draft, what is blocked, and what the next safe SDD step should be. Treat it as an explicit utility command, not as a semantic auto-loaded skill for ordinary SDD authoring.
Workflow
- Load the SDD reference.
- Read
../_shared/references/sdd-practical.md. - Apply the Language Policy: respond and write artifacts in the user's initial chat language while keeping skill instructions and templates in EN-US.
- Use package-level
templates/sdd-index.mdas the dashboard reference when useful. - Load relevant
.ai/steering/*.mdfiles only if they help explain project context; do not summarize steering unless useful. - Treat
.ai/strategy/handoff/strategy-brief.mdas optional upstream context and.ai/sdd/handoff/sdd-brief.mdas optional downstream handoff output.
- Read
- Inspect the workspace.
- Check whether
.ai/sdd/exists. - Check
.ai/sdd/INDEX.mdif present. - Check
.ai/sdd/PLAN.mdif present. - Check
.ai/strategy/handoff/strategy-brief.mdif present and report it as an available upstream handoff. - Check
.ai/sdd/handoff/sdd-brief.mdif present and report its readiness/status summary. - List
.ai/sdd/ideas/*.mdif present. - List
.ai/sdd/specs/*/directories. - For each spec directory, read
.statuswhen present. - For each spec directory, note presence of
requirements.md,design.md,tasks.md,review.md, anddecisions.md. - Compute the next feature ID from actual spec directories using the shared Feature Workspace Identity algorithm; report it as informational only.
- Flag duplicate numeric prefixes, non-canonical spec directory names, missing
.status, and invalid.statusvalues.
- Check whether
- Assess gates.
- Identify specs that are ready for PRD, SPEC, TASKS, EXEC, or REVIEW.
- Identify specs blocked by missing artifacts, draft statuses, or missing approvals.
- Identify implementation specs with incomplete tasks when
tasks.mdexists. - Identify specs whose
.statusconflicts with existing artifacts.
- Produce a concise dashboard.
- Group by Upstream Handoffs, Plan, Ideas, Specs, Handoff Output, In Progress, Review Ready, and Blocked.
- Include exact paths for important artifacts.
- Include the current
.statusvalue for each spec. - Recommend one or more next commands such as
/skill:sdd-prd,/skill:sdd-spec,/skill:sdd-tasks,/skill:sdd-exec, or/skill:sdd-review.
- Do not modify files.
- STATUS is read-only.
- If an index or status appears stale, recommend an update instead of editing it.
Output Format
SDD STATUS
Workspace: .ai/sdd
Steering: .ai/steering present/missing
Upstream Handoffs:
- .ai/strategy/handoff/strategy-brief.md: present/missing
Plan:
- [missing/draft/approved] .ai/sdd/PLAN.md
Ideas:
- 001-name — idea:captured — .ai/sdd/ideas/001-name.md
Specs:
- 001-feature — requirements:approved
Artifacts: requirements.md yes, design.md no, tasks.md no, review.md no
Next: /skill:sdd-spec
Feature Workspace:
- Next feature ID: 002
- Numbering source: filesystem `.ai/sdd/specs/*/`
- Issues: none / [duplicate prefix, invalid status, non-canonical directory]
Handoff Output:
- .ai/sdd/handoff/sdd-brief.md: present/missing/readiness
Blocked / Attention:
- [Path] [problem]
Recommended next action:
- [Specific next step]Quality Bar
- Be accurate and path-specific.
- Prefer short dashboards over long commentary.
- Do not infer approvals from file existence; use
.statusand artifact headers when available. - Flag missing or inconsistent status instead of silently normalizing it.
- Compute numbering from actual directories, never from memory or
INDEX.md. - When a strategy handoff exists but no SDD artifacts exist, recommend
/skill:sdd-planor/skill:sdd-prddepending on scope. - When tasks are approved but
sdd-brief.mdis missing or stale, recommend refreshing the SDD handoff.
Critical Rules
- Do not create, edit, or delete files in this skill.
- Do not approve drafts.
- Do not implement code.
- Do not run expensive verification commands unless the user explicitly asks for a health check.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

