testing-pyramid
Skill35 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when writing tests for a Symfony app — unit, integration (Kernel), and functional (WebTestCase) tests, the test database, fixtures/factories (Foundry), and what to mock. Use when the task mentions test, PHPUnit, WebTestCase, KernelTestCase, fixtures, or coverage.
- Reads credentials
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Abdox-menara/guard-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 24, 2026
- rrezartprebreza/spring-boot-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 7, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- rrezartprebreza/spring-boot-skills★ 344same name
- Abdox-menara/guard-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- api-platform-resourcesSkill
- bundle-organizationSkill
- console-commandsSkill
- doctrine-migrationsSkill
- doctrine-ormSkill
- doctrine-query-optimizationSkill
- domain-driven-designSkill
- dto-and-validationSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- jwt-authenticationSkill
- layered-architectureSkill
- messenger-asyncSkill
- problem-details-rfc9457Skill
- rest-controller-conventionsSkill
- security-authenticationSkill
- transactional-patternsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Test value objects, aggregates, and services with their collaborators mocked.
- Very specific: line 134
Prefer zenstruck/foundry factories over static fixture files — readable, overridable per test, no shared mutable state.
- Distinctive: line 159
Don't assert on private internals — test observable behavior.
- Distinctive: line 160
Keep functional tests few and focused on contracts.
- Very specific: line 161
No network calls in tests — mock HTTP clients (MockHttpClient).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Testing Pyramid (Symfony + PHPUnit)
The shape
╱╲ Functional (few) — WebTestCase: real HTTP kernel, real DB, full stack
╱──╲ Integration (some) — KernelTestCase: container + DB, no HTTP
╱────╲ Unit (many) — plain PHPUnit: pure PHP, no container, no DB
╱──────╲Most tests are fast unit tests of domain logic. A smaller layer of integration tests covers wiring + persistence. A thin top layer of functional tests covers the critical user-facing flows end-to-end. Don't invert it — a suite that's all WebTestCase is slow and brittle.
Unit tests — domain logic, no framework
Test value objects, aggregates, and services with their collaborators mocked. No container, no DB, milliseconds each.
final class OrderTest extends TestCase
{
public function test_confirming_an_empty_order_is_rejected(): void
{
$order = Order::place();
$this->expectException(\DomainException::class);
$order->confirm(); // invariant: can't confirm empty
}
public function test_adding_a_line_to_a_confirmed_order_is_rejected(): void
{
$order = Order::place();
$order->addItem(Uuid::v7(), 2);
$order->confirm();
$this->expectException(\DomainException::class);
$order->addItem(Uuid::v7(), 1);
}
}Mock only what you own and inject (ports/repositories). Don't mock value objects or the framework.
// ✅ mock the repository PORT
$orders = $this->createMock(OrderRepository::class);
$orders->method('ofId')->willReturn($existingOrder);
$service = new CancelOrderHandler($orders);Integration tests — wiring + persistence
KernelTestCase boots the container; pull real services and hit a real (test) database. Use it to verify repository queries, Doctrine mapping, and service wiring.
final class OrderRepositoryTest extends KernelTestCase
{
private EntityManagerInterface $em;
private OrderRepository $repo;
protected function setUp(): void
{
self::bootKernel();
$this->em = self::getContainer()->get(EntityManagerInterface::class);
$this->repo = self::getContainer()->get(OrderRepository::class);
}
public function test_find_active_by_customer_returns_only_active(): void
{
OrderFactory::createOne(['customerEmail' => 'a@x.io', 'status' => OrderStatus::Active]);
OrderFactory::createOne(['customerEmail' => 'a@x.io', 'status' => OrderStatus::Cancelled]);
$result = $this->repo->findActiveByCustomer('a@x.io');
self::assertCount(1, $result);
}
}Functional tests — the real HTTP stack
WebTestCase sends a real request through the kernel. Reserve it for critical flows and contract checks (status codes, problem+json shape, auth).
final class CreateOrderTest extends WebTestCase
{
public function test_post_orders_returns_201_with_location(): void
{
$client = static::createClient();
$client->request('POST', '/api/orders', server: [
'CONTENT_TYPE' => 'application/json',
], content: json_encode([
'customerEmail' => 'buyer@example.com',
'items' => [['productId' => Uuid::v7()->toRfc4122(), 'quantity' => 2]],
]));
self::assertResponseStatusCodeSame(201);
self::assertResponseHasHeader('Location');
}
public function test_invalid_payload_returns_422_problem_json(): void
{
$client = static::createClient();
$client->request('POST', '/api/orders', content: json_encode(['customerEmail' => 'not-an-email']));
self::assertResponseStatusCodeSame(422);
self::assertResponseHeaderSame('Content-Type', 'application/problem+json');
}
}The test database
- A separate DB for
test(.env.test/DATABASE_URL); never run tests against dev/prod data. - Reset state between tests with DAMA\DoctrineTestBundle (wraps each test in a transaction and rolls back) — far faster than truncating.
- Build schema from migrations in CI so tests catch migration drift.
php bin/console --env=test doctrine:database:create
php bin/console --env=test doctrine:migrations:migrate --no-interactionFixtures via factories (Foundry / Zenstruck)
Prefer zenstruck/foundry factories over static fixture files — readable, overridable per test, no shared mutable state.
final class OrderFactory extends PersistentProxyObjectFactory
{
public static function class(): string { return Order::class; }
protected function defaults(): array
{
return [
'customerEmail' => self::faker()->email(),
'status' => OrderStatus::Pending,
];
}
}
// In a test
$order = OrderFactory::createOne(['status' => OrderStatus::Active]);
OrderFactory::createMany(5);Conventions
- Name tests by behavior:
test_confirming_an_empty_order_is_rejected, nottestConfirm. - Arrange / Act / Assert structure; one logical assertion target per test.
- Don't assert on private internals — test observable behavior.
- Keep functional tests few and focused on contracts; push logic coverage down to unit tests.
- No network calls in tests — mock HTTP clients (
MockHttpClient).
Gotchas
- Agent writes everything as
WebTestCase— invert back to a pyramid: most logic in fast unit tests. - Agent mocks the entity / value object under test — only mock injected ports/collaborators.
- Agent hits dev/prod DB or shares state across tests — use a
testDB + DAMA transaction rollback. - Agent builds the test schema with
schema:update— run migrations so tests catch drift. - Agent makes real HTTP/API calls in tests — use
MockHttpClient. - Agent writes brittle assertions on serialized internals — assert status codes, headers, and visible fields.
- Agent uses static SQL fixture dumps — use Foundry factories for readable, isolated data.
- Agent forgets to assert the
application/problem+jsoncontent type on error-path tests.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

