geo-optimizer
Skill7 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze, implement, and verify technical SEO, GEO, AEO, AI-search visibility, citation-readiness, AI-question coverage, and repeatable visibility measurement for web projects. Use when creating a new website or web application; when the user asks to improve or measure visibility in ChatGPT Search, generative/AI answer engines, Google, Bing, SEO, GEO, or AEO; or when a code or content change may materially affect crawling, indexing, metadata, structured data, answer extraction, internal linking, analytics, or search-visible content. Do not invoke for unrelated changes that cannot affect public discovery or search presentation.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- F0rger123/CLAUDE-SEO-GOD-MODEtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- nowork-studio/notfair-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
- nowork-studio/topranktheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- liangdabiao/GEO-Content-Optimizer-Skilltheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
- huifer/claude-code-seotheir own version, first seen Jan 4, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- nowork-studio/toprank★ 4.1ksame name
- nowork-studio/notfair-plugin★ 4.1ksame name
- Auriti-Labs/geo-optimizer-skill★ 1.3ksame name
- liangdabiao/GEO-Content-Optimizer-Skill★ 183same name
- huifer/claude-code-seo★ 110same name
- F0rger123/CLAUDE-SEO-GOD-MODE★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository83 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accessibility-enforcerSkill
- access-policy-designerSkill
- adaptive-guardSkill
- agent-reviewerSkill
- anti-ai-slop-designSkill
- api-mock-designerSkill
- api-observability-plannerSkill
- app-store-reviewerSkill
- ask-first-act-laterSkill
- assumption-checkerSkill
- auth-flow-designerSkill
- b2b-founder-roadmapSkill
- brand-name-labSkill
- breaking-change-detectorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- checkpoint-guardianSkill
- claude-style-codingSkill
- claw-integration-designSkill
- context-compressorSkill
- contract-first-designerSkill
- coolify-orchestratorSkill
- crash-analystSkill
- data-lineage-tracerSkill
- data-maskerSkill
- deep-link-architectSkill
- design-intelligenceSkill
- design-md-enforcerSkill
- ecosystem-apiSkill
- ecosystem-databaseSkill
- ecosystem-mobileSkill
- ecosystem-orchestrationSkill
- ecosystem-productSkill
- ecosystem-reasoningSkill
- ecosystem-securitySkill
- ecosystem-webSkill
- error-recoverySkill
- fth-design-crafterSkill
- geo-auditorSkill
- index-advisorSkill
- jev-orchestratorSkill
- mastermind-loggerSkill
- memory-ledgerSkill
- migration-strategistSkill
- mobile-perf-auditorSkill
- mobile-security-auditorSkill
- multi-brain-debateSkill
- multi-brain-expertsSkill
- multi-brain-scoreSkill
- multi-brainSkill
- offline-sync-designerSkill
- onboarding-designerSkill
- output-criticSkill
- parallel-plannerSkill
- pgbouncer-architectSkill
- plan-hardenerSkill
- plan-implement-verify-recoverSkill
- proje-analizcisiSkill
- project-analyzerSkill
- project-focus-firstSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
18
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Ask only for missing facts that materially change implementation, such as target audience, market, language, product positioning, verified …
- Distinctive: line 16
Never invent prices, testimonials, credentials, statistics, locations, legal claims, customer counts, or product capabilities.
- Distinctive: line 18
Treat AI visibility as an extension of sound technical SEO, useful content, entity clarity, and external credibility—not as a separate …
- Distinctive: line 20
Avoid keyword stuffing, hidden text, doorway pages, fake FAQs, fabricated citations, schema spam, crawler cloaking, or instructions aimed …
- Distinctive: line 21
Do not claim success merely because files were added.
- Distinctive: line 28
Search and open their current official webmaster, crawler, structured-data, or publisher documentation.
- Distinctive: line 29
Prefer primary sources. Record the access date and the rules that affect the implementation.
- Distinctive: line 31
Do not copy stale bot names, IP ranges, directives, submission endpoints, or unsupported files from memory.
- Distinctive: line 33
If official sources cannot be reached, continue only with platform-neutral improvements.
- Distinctive: line 47
Read references/implementation-guide.md before auditing or implementing.
- Distinctive: line 51
Check whether CDN, WAF, authentication, rate limiting, or environment configuration can block legitimate crawlers.
- Distinctive: line 62
Prefer strengthening a coherent topic cluster and first-party evidence over publishing many generic pages.
- Distinctive: line 64
Keep backlink and external-visibility work as an ethical action plan.
- Distinctive: line 84
Run the narrowest relevant formatter, lint, type-check, unit tests, build, and framework route/static generation checks.
- Very specific: line 89
Use scripts/audit_url.py against a local or preview server when HTTP access is available.
- Distinctive: line 93
If a production or preview URL is available, inspect the live response, final URL, rendered content, robots file, sitemap, headers, and …
- Very specific: line 94
Check for deployment-only blocks such as WAF challenges, authentication, noindex, incorrect hostnames, or stale caches.
- Distinctive: line 95
Check that staging, preview, mirror, and legacy hosts are intentionally protected or consolidated and do not publish duplicate canonical …
- Distinctive: line 96
Do not make live verification a prerequisite when no live URL exists.
- Distinctive: line 100
Read references/report-template.md before presenting the result.
- Very specific: line 122
Use --json for machine-readable output.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI GEO Optimizer
CRITICAL LANGUAGE RULE: The instructions in this skill are written in English, but you MUST respond in the language of the user's request. All outputs, explanations, candidates, categories, and findings must be delivered in the user's language unless otherwise specified.
Improve a web project's discoverability in AI answer engines and conventional search without promising rankings, citations, traffic, or inclusion.
Operating rules
- Inspect the repository before asking questions. Infer the framework, rendering model, routes, content system, deployment clues, and existing search configuration.
- Ask only for missing facts that materially change implementation, such as target audience, market, language, product positioning, verified claims, or production URL.
- Never invent prices, testimonials, credentials, statistics, locations, legal claims, customer counts, or product capabilities.
- Preserve existing architecture, conventions, and unrelated user changes. Read and follow repository instructions.
- Treat AI visibility as an extension of sound technical SEO, useful content, entity clarity, and external credibility—not as a separate ranking trick.
- Optimize the full path from crawl eligibility to answer extraction, citation or mention, referral/exposure, and verified conversion. Keep those outcomes distinct.
- Avoid keyword stuffing, hidden text, doorway pages, fake FAQs, fabricated citations, schema spam, crawler cloaking, or instructions aimed at manipulating an AI model.
- Do not claim success merely because files were added. Verify observable behavior.
Required current-source gate
Before every implementation:
- Identify the search and AI platforms relevant to the request.
- Search and open their current official webmaster, crawler, structured-data, or publisher documentation.
- Prefer primary sources. Record the access date and the rules that affect the implementation.
- Distinguish confirmed platform requirements from general best practices and inferences.
- Do not copy stale bot names, IP ranges, directives, submission endpoints, or unsupported files from memory.
If official sources cannot be reached, continue only with platform-neutral improvements. Mark platform-specific work as unverified and leave exact follow-up checks. Do not describe the platform-specific portion as complete.
Workflow
1. Establish scope
- Determine whether the project is new, existing, or a targeted change.
- For a new public web project, include the search foundation automatically.
- For later changes, run this workflow only when public discovery, indexing, presentation, or answer extraction may be affected.
- Establish target audiences, regions, languages, conversion goals, and representative user questions from available evidence.
- Build a compact natural-language AI question map across applicable definition, how-to, comparison, alternative, recommendation, trust, commercial, local, and branded intents.
2. Audit before editing
Read references/implementation-guide.md before auditing or implementing.
- Inspect public routes, rendering behavior, robots controls, HTTP headers, sitemap generation, canonical handling, redirects, status codes, metadata, structured data, internal links, and content accessibility.
- Identify whether critical content exists in initial HTML or requires client-side execution.
- Check whether CDN, WAF, authentication, rate limiting, or environment configuration can block legitimate crawlers.
- Review entity, trust, authorship, freshness, source attribution, and answer-extraction signals.
- Establish a platform-by-query AI visibility baseline only when the actual platforms can be queried. Otherwise preserve the query set and mark the baseline unavailable.
- Classify every material finding as
Critical,High,Medium, orLow. Do not calculate a numeric score. - Separate observed defects from opportunities and external promotion ideas.
3. Plan the smallest complete change
- Prioritize crawl/index blockers and misleading signals before content expansion.
- Reuse framework-native metadata, sitemap, robots, routing, and structured-data facilities.
- Map each proposed page or section to a distinct user intent. Avoid near-duplicate pages.
- Prefer strengthening a coherent topic cluster and first-party evidence over publishing many generic pages.
- Explain any business fact that needs confirmation before coding it.
- Keep backlink and external-visibility work as an ethical action plan; do not contact people, create accounts, publish externally, or purchase links unless the user separately authorizes those actions.
4. Implement
Apply relevant changes across these layers:
- Discovery: robots rules, sitemap, indexability, canonical URLs, redirects, status codes, crawlable internal links, and crawler access.
- Search presentation: titles, descriptions, language/locale signals, social metadata when useful, and consistent public URLs.
- Entity and structured data: accurate JSON-LD that matches visible page content and the page's actual type.
- Answer readiness: focused headings, concise direct answers, comparison data, definitions, steps, dates, authorship, sources, and clear update signals where appropriate.
- Extractable knowledge: self-contained passages that retain the named subject, scope, conditions, date, evidence, and necessary context when quoted alone.
- Content coverage: intent-led landing pages, guides, FAQs only when genuine, and internal links connecting related questions to product or service pages.
- Trust: transparent organization, contact, policy, author, methodology, and evidence pages appropriate to the site.
- External visibility plan: relevant publications, directories, partnerships, expert contributions, digital PR, reference-worthy assets, and unlinked brand-mention opportunities. Never recommend spam or paid-link schemes as organic authority.
- Measurement: project-supported analytics for AI referrals, branded demand, citations or mentions gathered through controlled runs, and business conversions. Never invent a visibility rate from one answer.
Implement only what the repository and verified business information support.
5. Verify locally
- Run the narrowest relevant formatter, lint, type-check, unit tests, build, and framework route/static generation checks.
- Inspect generated or served HTML—not only source components—for titles, canonical links, robots directives, headings, structured data, and crawlable content.
- Validate JSON-LD syntax and ensure it matches visible claims.
- Confirm robots and sitemap routes return the intended content and URLs.
- Exercise redirects, missing pages, and important public routes where feasible.
- Use
scripts/audit_url.pyagainst a local or preview server when HTTP access is available.
6. Verify live when possible
- If a production or preview URL is available, inspect the live response, final URL, rendered content, robots file, sitemap, headers, and structured data.
- Check for deployment-only blocks such as WAF challenges, authentication,
noindex, incorrect hostnames, or stale caches. - Check that staging, preview, mirror, and legacy hosts are intentionally protected or consolidated and do not publish duplicate canonical entities or stale facts.
- Do not make live verification a prerequisite when no live URL exists. Complete local verification and provide a precise post-deployment checklist instead.
7. Report
Read references/report-template.md before presenting the result.
Always deliver:
- A concise summary of code and content changes.
- A GEO/SEO audit and verification report using only
Critical,High,Medium, andLowpriorities. - Content opportunities and representative target-user questions.
- The AI question map, visibility baseline when directly observable, and a repeatable measurement plan separating rank, mention, citation, referral, and conversion.
- A backlink and external-visibility action plan.
- A post-deployment checklist, including any live-only or officially unverified checks.
- Exact tests run, results, and limitations.
State explicitly that crawler access and optimization enable eligibility and improve clarity but do not guarantee indexing, ranking, recommendation, or citation.
Live audit helper
Run:
python3 scripts/audit_url.py https://example.comUse --json for machine-readable output. Treat its results as evidence for basic HTTP and HTML checks, not as a replacement for platform tools, rendered-page inspection, or current official documentation.
🔗 Next Steps & Handoffs
<!-- BEGIN GENERATED: handoffs (generated from the ecosystem workflow map by build_ecosystems.py — do not edit by hand) -->Ecosystem: @ecosystem-web — Web, Design & Delivery.
Workflows:
- Product Page Build Flow (
web-build-page, step 5 of 5): last step → once it passes, complete the workflow and report the outcome. - Search & AI Visibility Flow (
web-visibility, step 2 of 2): last step → once it passes, complete the workflow and report the outcome.
Handoff contract: pass results to the next skill through an inline Handoff block in your reply with the fields skill, workflow, created_at, inputs, summary, and next (the handoff contract of @ecosystem-web). If a next skill is not installed, continue with its step from the ecosystem map, or install it with npx skills add fatih-developer/fth-skills --skill <name> after the user agrees.
<!-- END GENERATED: handoffs -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

