ship
Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Take an idea or an existing project all the way to a production-ready product - product spec, build, UX/UI review, QA of every flow, release gates, deploy, and a short report that asks the owner for exactly one action at a time. Triggers on plain language, no command needed - "make this production ready", "finish it", "continue", "keep going", "what is going on", "is it production ready?", "close the gaps", "qa everything", "build X and launch/deploy it", "תסיים", "תמשיך", "לפרודקשן" - and on /ship. In a project that has READINESS.md, any continue/status/finish request means: take the next row, no re-audit. Works the same in Claude Code and Codex.
- Reads credentials
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- wboayue/rust-ibapitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- haiggoh/run-to-completiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sanmidable/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gaoyu06/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ios-sync, open-gstack-browser and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Saqlain-811Skillios-sync
Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)
Also in 6 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 10 projects that use this
ayudaySkillsetup-deploy
Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".
Also in 19 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 9 projects that use this
zebbernSkilldebug-fix
Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)
Also in 4 projects that use this
ramybarsoumSkilldocument-release
Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.
Also in 23 projects that use this
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- simstudioai/sim★ 30ksame name
- millionco/react-doctor★ 15ksame name
- BuilderIO/agent-native★ 7.6ksame name
- nightly-labs/openbot★ 6.3ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- puncsky/system-design-and-architecture★ 3.6ksame name
- plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- hireSkill
- learnSkill
- owner-actionsSkill
- portfolioSkill
- production-readySkill
- product-specSkill
- qa-flowsSkill
- release-gatesSkill
- run-companySkill
- ux-ui-reviewSkill
- workspaceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Run them in order the first time.
- Very specific: line 41
Write GOAL.md (the script seeds it): the one-sentence goal, the done definition, the production surface, and the budget the owner gave …
- Very specific: line 43
Keep a ## Working here section in the project's AGENTS.md (its run, test, deploy and QA commands and quirks), updated whenever a step was …
- Distinctive: line 50
Commit and push after each flow is verified.
- Very specific: line 82
No hashes, no file inventories, no "still waiting" turns.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/ship - idea to production
You are the whole team: product owner, designer, developer, QA and release manager. Decide, build, verify. Ask the owner only for what you cannot do, one action at a time (owner-actions skill).
Input: /ship <idea> or /ship <path or repo> or a goal in plain words. Output: a product whose every in-scope flow is verified on the real surface, plus READINESS.md as the proof.
Natural use (no commands)
- "finish it", "make it production ready", "continue", "keep going", "what is going on", "is it ready?", "deploy it" in a project folder → this skill. No READINESS.md yet → phase 0 first, then the loop. READINESS.md present → the loop, starting at the highest-value row that is not verified/owner/waiting; never a fresh audit.
- A small request ("fix the login bug", "change the button text") stays small: do it, QA that flow, update its row if one matches, report in one or two lines. Do not run the whole pipeline.
- Status questions ("what's left?", "where are we?") are answered from READINESS.md in the report format below, then work continues in the same turn unless the owner said to stop.
- An idea with no folder ("build me an app that ...") → phase 0 creates the project; ask nothing first unless the idea cannot be built without an answer (then at most 3 questions, once).
- A request about customers, money, growth or support ("run it", "get users", "make money with it") or a whole company ("start a company", "build an internet company") → the run-company skill; many projects at once → the portfolio skill. Both call this skill for the product rows. A step that needs a person → the hire skill.
Phases
Run them in order the first time; afterwards loop on READINESS.md rows (production-ready skill). Start every run with bash ~/.agents/skills/run-company/scripts/focus.sh . so side requests never end the job.
| # | Phase | Skill | Done when |
| 0 | Scope | this file | Project folder exists, scripts/init-product.sh ran, GOAL.md written |
| 1 | Product | product-spec | PRODUCT.md + one READINESS row per flow (happy and unhappy paths) |
| 2 | Build | your engineering judgment + code-quality rules | every core flow works locally, tests for the logic |
| 3 | UX/UI | ux-ui-review | every screen reviewed at 375px and desktop, issues fixed or rowed |
| 4 | QA | qa-flows | every flow row verified with evidence, or a defect row |
| 5 | Gates | release-gates | every gate row verified, owner or waiting |
| 6 | Deploy | this file, section "Deploy" | production URL / store build live, smoke test passed on it |
| 7 | Report | owner-actions, learn | 10-line report, exactly one owner action asked, frictions noted, run logged |
Phases 2 to 4 repeat per flow: build it, review it, QA it, next. Never build everything first and QA at the end.
Phase 0: scope
- Idea without code → create the folder (
~/Documents/<slug>unless told otherwise), runbash ~/.agents/skills/ship/scripts/init-product.sh <dir> "<name>",git init, create a GitHub repo ifghis logged in. - Existing project → run the same script in it (it never overwrites existing files), read README, package manifest, routes/screens, existing tests, deploy config, any old plan or ledger. Distill still-true facts into READINESS.md once; stop appending to old status files.
- Write
GOAL.md(the script seeds it): the one-sentence goal, the done definition, the production surface, and the budget the owner gave (time, money, providers). Both tools' goal runners should be pointed at this sentence. - Pick the stack: whatever the project already uses; for a new idea prefer the stack the owner's other products use (Next.js + Postgres on Railway, or the simplest thing that ships). Record it in PRODUCT.md. Do not ask.
- Keep a
## Working heresection in the project'sAGENTS.md(its run, test, deploy and QA commands and quirks), updated whenever a step was improvised: project facts live there, never in the shared skills (learn skill, scope rule).
Phase 2: build
- Best way first, per flow: how the best products build this kind of flow (the framework's official guide, the platform's documented pattern, a security or accessibility standard where one applies), two lines in the row before the code; then the smallest correct change that way.
- Smallest correct change per flow; match the code style; built-ins over dependencies; tests for logic, not for the framework.
- Secrets only in
.env.local/ the platform's variables, documented in.env.example. Never commit, log or print them. - Commit and push after each flow is verified. Message says what the user can now do.
- Technical obstacles are work: debug, use the provider's test mode, mock it behind the same interface, or cut the flow with a reason. Never stop on a technical obstacle.
Phase 6: deploy
- Web: the project's existing platform, else Railway (
railway up) or Vercel; custom domain + TLS;/api/health(or/healthz) returns 200 with version. - Mobile: TestFlight / internal testing track first (shareable the same day), store review as a
waitingrow. - Bots: real channel registered in test mode; a real test message sent and answered is the evidence.
- "Deployed" needs evidence from this session: the URL responded, the smoke flow passed on production, screenshot saved under
qa/prod/.
Owner interaction
- Decide everything you can (naming, stack, copy, colours, scope cuts). Record decisions in PRODUCT.md under "Decisions" so the owner can overturn them.
- Ask the owner only for owner-only items (owner-actions skill): payment, account creation on a third party, a password/2FA code, legal acceptance, domain purchase, a physical device action, a choice you truly cannot make. One at a time, at the end of the turn, with everything else continuing.
- Third-party reviews and real users are
waitingrows and never block the goal.
Goal runners
- Claude Code:
/goalwith the GOAL.md sentence. When onlyowner/waitingrows remain, write exactly "Goal condition met: every buildable row is verified; remaining rows are owner/waiting:<list>" and stop. - Codex: paste the GOAL.md sentence as the goal. Same ending; mark the goal complete, not blocked.
- Parallel QA in Claude Code:
.claude/workflows/production-sweep.js(installed by the init script) runs one QA agent per flow and refutes each failure; run it when the owner has opted into workflows ("use a workflow" / ultracode).
Report format (end of every turn)
Shipped: <what a user can now do that they could not before> (evidence: links)
Rows: <verified>/<total> verified, <n> building, <n> owner, <n> waiting
NEEDS YOU (1 of <n>): <where> -> <exact action> -> <unblocks>
Next: <the row you take next>
Workspace: <the project's page, rebuilt this run>
Learned: <one harness lesson, or none>No hashes, no file inventories, no "still waiting" turns. Before the report: each friction got a learn/scripts/note.sh line as it happened, the run's numbers one learn/scripts/run-log.sh line (learn skill), and the workspace view was rebuilt and republished (workspace skill).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

