meeting-prep
Skill346 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Meeting prep skill for Claude Code and Codex: generate a 30-minute pre-call brief for any target account with headline signals, attendee profiles, ranked talking points, discovery questions, and what NOT to do. Pulls real-time firmographics, hiring signals, technographics, funding, and business events for each prospect. Use for account research before sales calls, QBR preparation, and renewal meetings. Triggers on 'prep me for a meeting with', 'build a call brief for', 'I have a call with', 'pre-meeting research on'. Works in Claude Code, Codex, Hermes-Agent, and Claude Cowork.
53 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sammollaei/law-firm-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- microsoft/cat-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ShawhinT/non-coding-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sehgalmayank001/virtual-cortextheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- ARCASSystems/FounderOStheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- chacosoldier/compabobtheir own version, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use email-digest, meeting-followup and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
QuixiAISkillemail-digest
Digest and ingest emails into memory, surfacing important threads and action items
Also in 3 projects that use this
yakatotechSkillmeeting-followup
Create meeting minutes and follow-up email from meeting notes in one workflow. Execute all post-meeting tasks at once
Also in 3 projects that use this
vivy-yiSkillsocial-listening
Use when needing to understand audience needs, monitor brand mentions, track competitor activities, discover trends, or gather market intelligence from Xiaohongshu conversations
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinbox-triage
Use this skill whenever the user asks to clean up, triage, declutter, or archive low-value Outlook inbox mail - "clean up my inbox", "triage my mail", "declutter my inbox", "sort out newsletters", "archive old resolved threads", "/inbox-triage" - to group only newsletters, auto-notifications, past-event meeting logistics, resolved threads, and redundant duplicates into reviewable move-proposals presented for per-bucket approval before any message moves. Do not use for reading mail, drafting or sending replies, deleting mail, executing moves without explicit per-bucket approval, or acting on messages from the user's manager, direct reports, active threads, flagged mail, or labelled/HR/Legal/Finance/Security senders.
Also in 8 projects that use this
refly-aiSkillzoom
Integrate with Zoom for video meetings. Use when you need to: (1) schedule Zoom meetings, (2) create instant meetings, or (3) manage meeting details and invitations programmatically.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vijpatel7Skillcold-outreach
Write highly effective cold emails and LinkedIn messages to recruiters, hiring managers, founders, and engineers at target companies. Based on Ben Lang's proven cold outreach framework (Next Play). Use when the user wants to: (1) write a cold email to someone at a company they want to work for, (2) craft LinkedIn messages or InMail to recruiters or hiring managers, (3) reach out about unadvertised positions, (4) follow up on outreach or applications, (5) network with founders or executives for job opportunities, (6) prepare an outreach campaign to multiple companies. Triggers on: cold email, outreach, reach out to, contact recruiter, email founder, write to hiring manager, job email, networking email, LinkedIn message, InMail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions53 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
Wrote their own version · 52
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- gnekt/My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew★ 3.9ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
- QuixiAI/agi-memory★ 623same name
- QuixiAI/Hexis★ 623same name
- davekilleen/Dex★ 509same name
- glebis/claude-skills★ 410same name
- sonichi/sutando★ 396same name
- mgonto/executive-assistant-skills★ 118same name
- microsoft/cat-agent-skills★ 101same name
42 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- abm-campaignSkill
- account-contact-shortlistSkill
- account-fit-rankSkill
- account-researchSkill
- browser-extension-builderSkill
- clean-dataSkill
- cold-email-lemlistSkill
- competitor-researchSkill
- contact-researchSkill
- decision-makers-mapSkill
- enrich-companySkill
- enrich-contactSkill
- hubspot-enrichment-scoringSkill
- lead-gen-tool-builderSkill
- list-builderSkill
- lookalike-accountsSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- personalize-emailSkill
- score-leadsSkill
- talent-mappingSkill
- talent-sourcingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
If the identifier is ambiguous: a string with a dot or known TLD is a domain.
- Distinctive: line 28
Write the TL;DR last, framed by the meeting purpose and desired outcome.
- Distinctive: line 46
No native CRM relationship history or deal-stage data.
- Distinctive: line 47
No executive-move event enum.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Meeting Prep
Pull the company, signal, and attendee evidence the calling agent needs to write a tight, decision-ready brief for a ~30-minute meeting.
Input
- Account identifier (required): an Explorium business_id (preferred), or a company name or domain.
- Attendees (recommended): names and/or emails. Without attendees the brief is necessarily generic.
- Meeting context (strongly recommended): free-form description of purpose, stakes, prior discussions, deal stage, walk-out goals, known tensions, competitive context, the offering in play, hypotheses to test, and pitfalls. Flat enums produce flat briefs.
If the identifier is ambiguous: a string with a dot or known TLD is a domain; otherwise treat it as a name.
Workflow
Parallelize aggressively. Company enrichment fans out from the resolved account; per attendee, resolve and enrich profile evidence in parallel.
- Anchor on purpose. Restate the meeting context in 1-2 sentences. If missing, ask once; if the user declines, default to general prep and state that assumption. Derive purpose (1 line), desired outcome, 3-5 priority topics, named risks or hypotheses. These drive insight focus, attendee framing, talking-point ranking, and the suggested agenda.
- Match the business. If a business_id was supplied, use it directly. Otherwise resolve by name or domain. If no confident match, surface the ambiguity rather than guessing. Domain-variant sanity check: if firmographics show a major brand but headcount is 1-50 and the entity looks like a registered-agent shell, retry with the alternate domain (.so vs .com) or the company-name string.
- Enrich the business broadly: firmographics and technographics, funding and acquisitions, strategic insights and stated challenges, hiring direction and workforce trends, competitive landscape and company hierarchies, recent LinkedIn posts, website changes. Gather broadly now; decide relevance during synthesis.
- Fetch business events on a 30-90 day window. Treat events as raw signal to triage in step 6. Event-attribution sanity check: tie every event to the matched business; do not blend across the parent / subsidiary tree silently.
- Match and enrich attendees in parallel. Resolve each by email when available, otherwise by full name plus the resolved company. If an attendee cannot be resolved, note it; do not fabricate. Enrich each resolved person for profile (seniority, department, tenure, prior roles). Pull contacts only when the user intends to send outreach: default email-only (cheaper), switch to email + phone only when phone is required (SDR dialer flows). Per-prospect post history is a current gap; pull the employer's recent posts for voice instead.
- Hand back raw evidence for synthesis. The calling agent writes the narrative brief. Organize so the calling agent can: triage events and posts (keep items tied to purpose, deal stage, attendees, priority topics; drop generic press); classify per-attendee posture from employment history and recent voice (Cold, Warm-but-dormant with significant past tenure at a relevant prior employer, Active, Hostile); rank 3-5 talking points by relevance to the desired outcome, each tied to a specific surfaced fact and ideally a named attendee; mark each named hypothesis confirmed, contradicted, or unresolved; tag claims by source category; flag any past-dated milestone for verification rather than dropping silently.
- Write the TL;DR last, framed by the meeting purpose and desired outcome.
Output Format
- TL;DR: meeting purpose / desired outcome in one line (or "general meeting prep (no context supplied)" if defaulted); top 3 to know walking in, each tied to the outcome; hypothesis check one line each (confirmed / contradicted / unresolved); "Open with" a single recommended opening line, verbatim, calibrated to attendee posture.
- Company Snapshot: industry, size bucket, revenue range, HQ, website, business model. One paragraph weaving in strategic priorities and current challenges.
- Signals Worth Raising: grouped by category (funding and M&A, hiring direction, tech stack overlap or gaps, recent business events, voice on LinkedIn or site changes, competitive context, parent / subsidiary). For any past date inline: "Verify; date is in the past."
- Attendees: per attendee, name and title, department (fallback "Unattributed" when null), canonical seniority display (c-suite, vice president, director, manager), email, phone, LinkedIn, time in role, posture (Cold / Warm-but-dormant / Active / Hostile). "Why they matter for THIS meeting": 2 lines max. Talking points for them: 1-2 specific. If profile data is thin: "Profile data restricted; verify externally."
- Talking Points (3-5): ranked by impact, tagged for audience, each referencing a supporting data point with its source category tag. Prioritize items that show homework, connect to the offering, surface competitive angles, or hit a specific persona.
- Discovery Questions (3-5): specific, anchored in concrete facts. Tag each for an attendee or the group.
- Suggested Agenda (~30 min): (0-5) Open with the calibrated line; (5-15) Explore with the top talking point and 2 questions; (15-25) Develop with the secondary point, demo, or proposal; (25-30) Close on the specific desired next step.
- What NOT to Do: 1-3 specific failure modes for THIS meeting. Concrete, not generic.
Limitations
- Strategic insights and stated challenges are sourced from SEC 10-K filings: for private companies these will be all-null, and for public companies they can be 12-18 months stale. Use business events, funding, workforce trends, and recent posts for current-state signals.
- Business event fetching supports a date floor but no upper bound; window the upper edge client-side.
- Company size and revenue are bucketed. State buckets verbatim; do not interpolate exact figures.
- No native CRM relationship history or deal-stage data. Posture must be inferred from profile history and post voice, plus user-supplied context.
- No executive-move event enum. New-hire / departure signals must be inferred from workforce trends and profile changes, not fetched as a typed event.
- Past-dated milestones must be verified externally; treat them as prompts to check, not ground truth.
- Attendees who cannot be matched should be listed as unresolved. Do not synthesize their roles.
- Department is null for many cross-functional senior roles (Chief X Officer, President, Founder). Group these under "Unattributed".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

