lead-generation
Skill67 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate enriched lead lists using Exa Agent. Finds companies matching an ICP, enriches with signals/news/scores, and outputs CSV. Use when generating leads, building prospect lists, finding companies to sell to, doing outbound research, or ICP-based company discovery. Triggers on "leads", "lead gen", "prospect list", "find companies", "ICP", "outbound list".
- Reads credentials
5 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cliedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- bedomax/webdesigner-agenttheir own version, first seen Jul 22, 2026
- BlackBlazeXXX/claude-skills-marketingtheir own version, first seen Mar 31, 2026
- nirholas/XActionstheir own version, first seen Feb 24, 2026
- PHY041/claude-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 20, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli★ 3359% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- nirholas/XActions★ 648same name
- PHY041/claude-agent-skills★ 18same name
- bedomax/webdesigner-agent★ 1same name
- BlackBlazeXXX/claude-skills-marketing★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- build-with-exaSkill
- company-researchSkill
- exa-contentsSkill
- exa-searchSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
If the Agent tools are not available, tell the user:
- Very specific: line 25
Use agent_run, plus Write and Bash (for CSV output).
- Distinctive: line 40
When the user says something like "Make a list of 200 leads for [company]", first establish the Ideal Customer Profile.
- Distinctive: line 78
Add enrichment fields tailored to the campaign (funding stage, headcount range, headquarters, hiring signals, etc.).
- Very specific: line 129
If the run is still running, call agent_run with its runId until outputReady is true or the run reaches a terminal status (failed or …
- Very specific: line 130
Read the companies from output.structured, citations from output.grounding, and the run cost from costDollars in the agent_run result.
- Distinctive: line 132
Do not paste the full raw output into the conversation — go straight to CSV.
- Very specific: line 136
Write output.structured.companies to {target_company}_leads_{YYYY-MM-DD}.csv, sorted by icp_fit_score descending.
- Distinctive: line 152
If the user wants more leads than one run returned:
- Very specific: line 154
Create a new follow-up run with previousRunId set to the completed run's ID, asking for additional companies
- Very specific: line 155
Put the company records already collected into input.exclusion so the new run avoids them
- Very specific: line 162
If a run ends failed, read the error from the agent_run result, adjust the query or schema, and retry once with different wording
- Distinctive: line 164
If results are consistently below the requested count, narrow the ICP into 2-3 sub-vertical runs instead of one broad run
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lead Generation with Exa Agent
Generate enriched lead lists using the Exa Agent API. An Agent run is an asynchronous, multi-step web research task: you describe the list you want plus an output schema, and Exa handles query decomposition, searching, verification, enrichment, and structured output internally. You do NOT need to orchestrate parallel searches, subagents, or manual deduplication.
For very large or continuously maintained lead lists with per-item verification, consider Exa Websets instead: https://exa.ai/docs/websets/quickstart
Prerequisites
This skill requires the Exa MCP server with the Agent tool enabled. Use the agent_tools URL selection alias to enable agent_run.
If the Agent tools are not available, tell the user:
You need the Exa MCP server installed with the Agent tools and your API key. Instructions: https://exa.ai/docs/get-started/exa-mcp
Then stop.
Tool Restriction
Use agent_run, plus Write and Bash (for CSV output). Do NOT use generic web search for the lead list itself.
Workflow
1. Confirm the ICP with the user (one small Agent run if research is needed)
2. Call `agent_run` with an outputSchema
3. If the result is still running, call `agent_run` again with its `runId`
4. Read `output.structured` from the `agent_run` result
5. Write the CSV
6. Optional: expand with follow-up runs (previousRunId + input.exclusion)Step 1: Understand the ICP
When the user says something like "Make a list of 200 leads for [company]", first establish the Ideal Customer Profile. If the user already described the ICP, confirm it. If not, run one small Agent run to research it:
agent_run {
"query": "Research {company_name}: what they sell, who their existing customers are, and what their ideal customer profile is.",
"effort": "low",
"outputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"company_description": { "type": "string", "description": "What the company does in 2 sentences or less" },
"icp_description": { "type": "string", "description": "Concise ICP description that clearly defines target companies" },
"sub_verticals": { "type": "array", "maxItems": 10, "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Sub-verticals breaking down the ICP" },
"useful_enrichments": { "type": "array", "maxItems": 8, "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Enrichment columns useful for filtering high-signal companies" }
},
"required": ["company_description", "icp_description", "sub_verticals", "useful_enrichments"]
}
}Present the ICP to the user and confirm:
- Is the ICP description accurate?
- Any companies to exclude (competitors, existing customers)?
- How many leads do they want? (default 200)
- Any specific enrichment columns they care about?
Step 2: Create the Lead-Gen Run
Design an outputSchema with a bounded companies array. Keep schemas small, flat, and explicit; always bound arrays with maxItems.
Core fields to always include:
company_name(string)website(string)product_description(string, "in 12 words or less")icp_fit_score(integer, 1-10)icp_fit_reasoning(string, "compelling one-liner in 20 words or less")
Add enrichment fields tailored to the campaign (funding stage, headcount range, headquarters, hiring signals, etc.). Give string fields a length hint in their description to keep CSV output clean.
Set these run inputs:
query— describe the list: the ICP, geography, stage, and how many companies you wantoutputSchema— the exact structure back, withmaxItemsbounding the companies arraysystemPrompt— scoring rules, source preferences, dedup/exclusion emphasisinput.exclusion— companies to avoid (competitors, existing customers, results from earlier runs)effort—"low"by default;"auto","high", or"xhigh"for large or hard lists
Example:
agent_run {
"query": "Find 100 companies matching this ICP: {icp_description}. Prioritize {sub_verticals}. For each company, score ICP fit 1-10 for {user_company}.",
"effort": "low",
"systemPrompt": "Prefer official company sites and recent funding announcements. Do not include duplicates or subsidiaries of the same parent company.",
"input": {
"exclusion": [
{ "company_name": "{competitor_1}" },
{ "company_name": "{existing_customer_1}" }
]
},
"outputSchema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"companies": {
"type": "array",
"maxItems": 100,
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"company_name": { "type": "string" },
"website": { "type": "string", "format": "uri" },
"product_description": { "type": "string", "description": "in 12 words or less" },
"icp_fit_score": { "type": "integer", "description": "1-10" },
"icp_fit_reasoning": { "type": "string", "description": "one-liner in 20 words or less" }
},
"required": ["company_name", "website", "product_description", "icp_fit_score", "icp_fit_reasoning"]
}
}
},
"required": ["companies"]
}
}agent_run returns the completed result when possible. If it returns status: "running" with an agent_run_... ID, save the ID and continue with agent_run using only runId.
Step 3: Wait and Read Output
- If the run is still running, call
agent_runwith itsrunIduntiloutputReadyis true or the run reaches a terminal status (failedorcancelled). - Read the companies from
output.structured, citations fromoutput.grounding, and the run cost fromcostDollarsin theagent_runresult.
Do not paste the full raw output into the conversation — go straight to CSV.
Step 4: Write the CSV
Write output.structured.companies to {target_company}_leads_{YYYY-MM-DD}.csv, sorted by icp_fit_score descending. Join any array fields with " | ". Use Python's csv.writer (handles quoting/escaping) via Bash, or Write directly for small lists.
Print a summary:
## Lead Generation Complete
- Total leads: {count}
- ICP score distribution: 8-10: {N} | 5-7: {N} | 1-4: {N}
- Run ID: {agent_run_id}
- Cost: ${costDollars}
- Output: {filename}Step 5: Expanding the List
If the user wants more leads than one run returned:
- Create a new follow-up run with
previousRunIdset to the completed run's ID, asking for additional companies - Put the company records already collected into
input.exclusionso the new run avoids them - Append the new results to the CSV and re-deduplicate by normalized company name (strip "Inc"/"Ltd"/etc., case-insensitive)
For lists in the many hundreds, run a few runs sequentially this way rather than one giant run, and confirm scope with the user first: "This will require ~{N} Agent runs. Proceed?"
Handling Failures
- If a run ends
failed, read the error from theagent_runresult, adjust the query or schema, and retry once with different wording - Aborting an in-progress
agent_runcall does not cancel the run - If results are consistently below the requested count, narrow the ICP into 2-3 sub-vertical runs instead of one broad run
MCP Configuration
Requires an Exa API key. Get yours at https://dashboard.exa.ai/api-keys
{
"servers": {
"exa": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.exa.ai/mcp?tools=agent_tools",
"headers": {
"x-api-key": "YOUR_EXA_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}References
- Exa Agent guide: https://exa.ai/docs/agent/quickstart
- Exa MCP setup: https://exa.ai/docs/get-started/exa-mcp
- Websets (verified list-building at scale): https://exa.ai/docs/websets/quickstart
- Full docs for LLMs: https://exa.ai/docs/llms.txt
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

