agentleFS
evergonlabsevergonlabs/aiframework/.claude/skills/retro/SKILL.md

retro

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a deep session retrospective analyzing the most recent AI coding session. Uses Entire.io session data + static analysis, then the agent reviews its own work to extract learnings and generate rules.

193 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use plan-tune, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    pair-agent

    Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Saqlain-811
  • +2 more from ShreyRavi

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the static analysis first.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Should any health checks be added to sheal check?

    line 48
  3. Distinctive:

    After presenting the report, ask the user if they want to apply any of the suggested rules.

    line 81
  4. Distinctive:

    Don't generate rules for one-off issues that won't recur

    line 103
  5. Distinctive:

    Consider whether the issue is project-specific or universal

    line 104

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Session Retrospective Skill

You are performing a deep retrospective analysis of a completed AI coding session. This is the self-healing loop: you're reviewing what happened and generating actionable rules to improve future sessions.

Step 1: Gather Data

Run the static analysis first. If a checkpoint ID was provided as an argument, use it. Otherwise, use the latest checkpoint.

sheal retro --format json [-c CHECKPOINT_ID]

Also load the session details to see the Entire.io summary:

sheal sessions --format json [-c CHECKPOINT_ID]

Step 2: Deep Analysis

With the static analysis and session data loaded, analyze the session deeply. Consider:

Failure Patterns

  • For each failure loop or Bash failure: why did it happen? Was it a wrong approach, missing context, environment issue, or normal iteration?
  • Could a pre-check have prevented it?
  • Was the agent stuck or making progress?

Effort Quality

  • Was the file churn productive iteration or wasted effort?
  • Were the right tools used? (e.g., using Bash when Read/Grep would have been better)
  • Was research done before implementation, or was the approach trial-and-error?

Missing Context

  • What information was missing at the start that caused problems later?
  • What should have been in CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, or project documentation?
  • Were there assumptions that turned out wrong?

Workflow Improvements

  • What would make the next session smoother?
  • Are there recurring patterns that should become rules?
  • Should any health checks be added to sheal check?

Step 3: Generate Output

Present your analysis as a structured retrospective report:

Report Format

## Session Retrospective: [checkpoint-id]

### Summary
[1-2 sentence summary of what happened and how it went]

### Health Score: [X/100]
[Explain why this score, what went well, what didn't]

### Key Findings

#### What Went Well
- [thing 1]
- [thing 2]

#### What Could Be Improved
- [issue 1]: [why it happened] -> [what to do differently]
- [issue 2]: [why it happened] -> [what to do differently]

### Suggested Rules
[List specific rules that should be added to agent config files]

Step 4: Apply Learnings (with user confirmation)

After presenting the report, ask the user if they want to apply any of the suggested rules. If yes:

  1. For Claude Code: append rules to CLAUDE.md in the project root
  2. For Cursor: append to .cursorrules
  3. For Gemini: append to .gemini/GEMINI.md
  4. For general: append to AGENTS.md

Format rules as clear, actionable instructions. For example:

## Learnings from session [date]

- Before writing parsers for external data formats, inspect real data samples first (`git show branch:path/to/file | head -20`). Don't assume formats from documentation alone.
- When a CLI tool fails with "connection refused", check if its required server process is running before retrying the same command.
- Run `sheal check` at session start to catch environment issues early.

Important Notes

  • Be honest about what went well — not every session has problems
  • Focus on actionable, specific learnings, not generic advice
  • Rules should be phrased as instructions to a future AI agent
  • Don't generate rules for one-off issues that won't recur
  • Consider whether the issue is project-specific or universal

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.