aif-status
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Project health check and next-steps guide. Run this first after aiframework setup, or anytime to check what needs attention.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- aif-analyzeSkill
- aif-enhanceSkill
- aif-evolveSkill
- aif-feedbackSkill
- aif-ingestSkill
- aif-learnSkill
- aif-pulseSkill
- aiframework-learnSkill
- aiframework-reviewSkill
- aiframework-shipSkill
- aif-readySkill
- aif-researchSkill
- aif-reviewSkill
- aif-shipSkill
- retroSkill
- sheal-askSkill
- sheal-checkSkill
- sheal-driftSkill
- sheal-retroSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Read and verify these files exist.
- Very specific: line 41
Use Glob to check: /{CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md,.cursorrules} and .claude/rules/*.md and .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md
- Very specific: line 45
Read .aiframework/manifest.json and evaluate:
- Distinctive: line 124
If gaps were found, offer to fix them:
- Distinctive: line 134
Don't dump raw file contents — summarize
- Distinctive: line 135
If everything is green, say so: "All systems go.
- Distinctive: line 136
If there are gaps, prioritize: what gives the most value for least effort?
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/aif-status — Project Setup Status & Next Steps
You are checking the health of an aiframework-configured project and guiding the user on what to do next.
Step 0: Telemetry (silent, non-blocking)
aiframework-telemetry skill_invoked skill=aif-status 2>/dev/null || trueSteps
Step 1: Check Generated Files
Read and verify these files exist. For each, note if it's present, its line count, and whether it looks correct:
CLAUDE.md — Project brain (should be 80-150 lines)
AGENTS.md — Universal agent config (should be 30-80 lines)
.cursorrules — Cursor IDE config
.claude/rules/workflow.md — Workflow rules
.claude/rules/pipeline.md — 12-stage pipeline (moderate+ only)
.claude/rules/session-protocol.md — Session checklists (moderate+ only)
.claude/rules/invariants.md — Domain invariants (moderate+ only)
.claude/settings.json — Claude Code permissions
.claude/skills/ — Custom skills
.githooks/pre-push — Quality gate hook
.github/workflows/ci.yml — CI pipeline
docs/reference/architecture.md — Architecture reference (moderate+ only)
vault/memory/status.md — Session memory
tools/learnings/ — Learning capture
CHANGELOG.md — Release history
VERSION — Version trackingUse Glob to check: **/{CLAUDE.md,AGENTS.md,.cursorrules} and .claude/rules/*.md and .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md
Step 2: Check Manifest Quality
Read .aiframework/manifest.json and evaluate:
- Language: Is it correct? Does it match the actual primary language?
- Framework: Detected or "none"?
- Archetype: Does it make sense for this project?
- Commands: Are build/test/lint configured or NOT_CONFIGURED?
- Domains: Any detected? Are they accurate (not false positives)?
- Description: Is it a real description or HTML/empty?
- Complexity: simple/moderate/complex/enterprise — affects tier
Step 3: Check Code Index
Read .aiframework/code-index.json metadata:
jq '._meta' .aiframework/code-index.jsonReport: files indexed, symbols extracted, modules found. If 0 files: code index wasn't run (use aiframework index).
Step 4: Check Vault Health
vault/.vault/scripts/vault-tools.sh doctor 2>/dev/null || echo "Vault not initialized"Step 5: Check for Enhancement Opportunities
Identify gaps that /aif-enhance can fill:
- Framework detected but no framework-specific invariants? →
/aif-enhance - Commands NOT_CONFIGURED for build/test/lint? → User needs to add to package.json/Makefile
- No domains detected? → Project may need
/aif-enhanceto research conventions - Code index has 0 modules? → Run
aiframework index --target . - No learnings captured? → Start using
/aif-learnafter discoveries - CLAUDE.md over 200 lines? → Run
aiframework refreshto slim it down
Step 6: Generate Status Report
Output a clean table:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
aiframework Status — {project_name}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Stack: {language} / {framework}
Archetype: {archetype} ({maturity}, {complexity})
Tier: {tier}
┌─────────────────────────┬──────────┐
│ Component │ Status │
├─────────────────────────┼──────────┤
│ CLAUDE.md │ ✓ (N lines) │
│ AGENTS.md │ ✓ (N lines) │
│ .cursorrules │ ✓ / ✗ │
│ Extended rules │ ✓ N files │
│ Custom skills │ ✓ N skills │
│ Git hooks │ ✓ / ✗ │
│ CI workflow │ ✓ / ✗ │
│ Code index │ N files, N symbols │
│ Vault │ ✓ / ✗ │
│ Learnings │ N entries │
└─────────────────────────┴──────────┘
What to do next:
─────────────────
1. /aif-enhance ← Research your framework's conventions (run once)
2. /aif-analyze ← Find missing tests, circular deps (run once)
3. Start coding! ← aiframework is ready
Recurring:
4. /aif-learn "..." ← After discovering gotchas
5. /aif-evolve ← Weekly: improve rules from learnings
6. /aif-pulse ← Weekly: discover new Claude Code featuresStep 7: Offer Quick Actions
If gaps were found, offer to fix them:
- "I see your build command is NOT_CONFIGURED. Want me to detect it from your Makefile/package.json?"
- "No framework invariants found. Want me to run
/aif-enhanceto research your framework's best practices?" - "CLAUDE.md is 300 lines — want me to run
aiframework refreshto slim it down?" - "No learnings captured yet. After your next bug fix, run
/aif-learnto record what you learned."
Output Rules
- Be concise — status table + numbered next steps
- Don't dump raw file contents — summarize
- If everything is green, say so: "All systems go. Start coding."
- If there are gaps, prioritize: what gives the most value for least effort?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

