did
Skill25 starsChanged 34 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Design, estimate, validate, and write up a difference-in-differences analysis, using the post-2018 heterogeneity-robust toolkit with an explicit statement of which parallel-trends assumption is imposed. TRIGGER on "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "TWFE", "event study", "staggered adoption", "staggered rollout", "parallel trends", "pre-trends", "Callaway-Sant'Anna", "Sun-Abraham", "imputation estimator", "Goodman-Bacon", "stacked DiD", "not-yet-treated", "repeated cross-section", "HonestDiD", "triple differences", "Poisson DiD", "nonlinear DiD", or any panel or repeated-cross-section setting where units become treated over time (policy rollout, staggered feature launch, state law changes). One or a few treated aggregate units: synthetic-control. No design chosen yet: causal-design.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bibcheckSkill
- causal-designSkill
- compile-latexSkill
- conjointSkill
- councilSkill
- course-siteSkill
- field-experimentSkill
- ivSkill
- litreviewSkill
- rddSkill
- reading-papersSkill
- referee-responseSkill
- replication-packageSkill
- research-talkSkill
- review-paperSkill
- slide-reviewSkill
- synthetic-controlSkill
- teaching-lectureSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.