conjoint
Skill25 starsChanged 34 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Design, analyze, and write up conjoint experiments in both traditions: as randomized experiments identifying average marginal component effects, and as preference-measurement instruments (hierarchical Bayes partworths, WTP, choice-share simulation), with measurement-error correction, multiple-testing correction, and a claims firewall on preference talk. TRIGGER on "conjoint", "AMCE", "marginal means", "AMIE", "choice-based conjoint", "CBC", "paired profiles", "attribute randomization", "partworth", "willingness to pay from choice data", "WTP space", "hierarchical Bayes conjoint", "pAMCE", "DCE", "mixed logit", "cjbart", "vignette experiment" (fully randomized factorial vignettes only), "IRR correction", "projoint", "cjoint", "factorEx", "bayesm", "choice share simulation". Text or image profiles whose treatment components are latent inside the stimulus are out of scope: the component needs a design of its own.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bibcheckSkill
- causal-designSkill
- compile-latexSkill
- councilSkill
- course-siteSkill
- didSkill
- field-experimentSkill
- ivSkill
- litreviewSkill
- rddSkill
- reading-papersSkill
- referee-responseSkill
- replication-packageSkill
- research-talkSkill
- review-paperSkill
- slide-reviewSkill
- synthetic-controlSkill
- teaching-lectureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.