brief
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Project-aware session briefing. Loads project-intel, decisions log, deferred actions, and known-issues files before any work, so Claude starts with project context instead of cold. Use at session start, before any task, or when the user says "/brief", "brief me", "what should I know", "catch me up".
78 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- serhiileniv/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- serhiileniv/ccstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fjwood69/moritheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cathyzhang0905/agent-cockpittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- grainulation/grainulatortheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use capture, strategy and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
toneron2Skillcapture
Capture thoughts to inbox with automatic classification
Also in 6 projects that use this
EpistatesSkillstrategy
Plan weekly or monthly X content strategy. Use when the user wants to plan their content calendar, set growth goals, build a content pipeline, or think strategically about their X presence.
Also in 4 projects that use this
aleksander-dytkoSkilldecision
Make a product decision with full context from the vault and available sources
Also in 3 projects that use this
dirienSkilldecide
Three-agent adversarial debate protocol for strategic decisions. Two advocates steelman opposing positions while a moderator identifies risks and synthesizes a binding consensus. Use when choosing between alternatives, evaluating tradeoffs, or making high-stakes decisions.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JaimeGBASkillingest
Digest an external source (article, paper, transcript, URL, book chapter) and integrate its content into the knowledge base
Also in 7 projects that use this
howellsSkillreconcile
Audit a project against current plugin conventions and offer to update structure.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions78 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 78
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- with-pebbly/aseprite-ai-artist★ 473same name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- github/lever★ 279same name
- dylanroscover/Embody★ 213same name
- yofine/skills★ 154same name
- grainulation/grainulator★ 86same name
- g2i-ai/agents★ 52same name
- gregmos/memoforge★ 38same name
68 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- battleSkill
- codex-writeSkill
- councilSkill
- crawlSkill
- deslopSkill
- evaluate-planSkill
- gmail-attachmentSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- model-scanSkill
- modeSkill
- namecheapSkill
- pair-sessionSkill
- planSkill
- salesforce-reportsSkill
- second-opinionSkill
- update-machineSkill
- week-aheadSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 71 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
If the project has .claude/llm-mode.json and its mode is "multi", delegate the heavy doc reading to a cheaper CLI (Antigravity CLI — agy, …
- Distinctive: line 82
If CWD is inside a known project directory → that's the project.
- Distinctive: line 83
If CWD is a workspace root with multiple projects → ask which one.
- Distinctive: line 84
If the user mentioned a project name → load that one.
- Very specific: line 157
If .claude/project-intel.md doesn't exist:
- Distinctive: line 160
Read CLAUDE.md for conventions.
- Very specific: line 161
Check docs/feedback/, docs/content-review/, docs/plans/.
- Very specific: line 162
Check .claude/skills/ to learn what the project can do.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 71 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/brief — Project-Aware Session Briefing
Build a synthesized briefing of the project so Claude knows what the project IS, how it works, and what to avoid before doing anything else.
Optional delegation mode
If the project has .claude/llm-mode.json and its mode is "multi", delegate the heavy
doc reading to a cheaper CLI (Antigravity CLI — agy, previously the Gemini CLI — is a
common pick). Only pull the result back to synthesize. If the file is absent or mode is
"single", run the standard path. If the delegated call fails, fall back to standard
silently.
Example delegated call:
# `agy` (Antigravity CLI) replaces the sunset Gemini CLI on consumer plans as of
# 2026-06-18; enterprise plans may still use the legacy `gemini` binary. The model
# identifier (`gemini-3-pro`) is unchanged.
#
# Note: piping into `agy` already provides stdin, so the `</dev/null` gotcha that
# applies to bare `agy -p "..."` doesn't bite here. For non-piped scripted calls
# elsewhere, always write `agy -p "<prompt>" </dev/null`.
echo "You are a research analyst. I am about to work on: $TASK.
Review the attached documentation and output a Pre-Task Briefing:
1. WATCH OUT — past mistakes, forbidden patterns, known issues
2. HARD CONSTRAINTS — non-negotiable rules
3. PROJECT CONTEXT — what this project IS, tech stack, capabilities
4. STRATEGIC CONTEXT — goals, audience, positioning
5. RELATED WORK — existing content, features, or code that overlaps
6. RECOMMENDATIONS — specific suggestions
Cite source file paths. Omit empty sections." | \
agy -m gemini-3-pro -p "" @.claude/project-intel.md @docs/ > .brief-temp.mdStandard load order
Execute these reads in parallel where possible:
Tier 1 — always load
- Project intel —
.claude/project-intel.mdin the project directory. If it's missing, flag it: "No project-intel.md — operating with limited project context." - Failure atlas / known issues — whatever the project uses (
docs/memory/failure-atlas.md,docs/known-issues.md, etc.). Skip silently if absent. - CLAUDE.md — project-level
.claude/CLAUDE.mdorCLAUDE.mdfor conventions. - Feedback files — anything loaded via a memory index in the project.
Tier 2 — project history
- Decisions log —
docs/decisions/log.md(last 10 entries). - Recent session topics —
docs/sessions/topics/*.mdif the project uses that pattern. - Deferred actions —
docs/deferred-actions.md.
Tier 3 — cross-project (only when the workspace contains multiple projects)
- Capabilities index — what each sibling project can do.
- Topic graph — shared topics, decisions, and capability pointers.
- Last-session marker — the timestamp of the previous session so the "since last session" section is accurate.
Project detection
- If CWD is inside a known project directory → that's the project.
- If CWD is a workspace root with multiple projects → ask which one.
- If the user mentioned a project name → load that one.
- Otherwise → ask.
Scoring (for ranking briefing items)
score(item) = utility × recency × relevance × (1 − suppression)| Item type | Utility |
| Mistake relevant to today's work | 1.0 |
| Decision made since last session | 0.9 |
| Deferred action due within 48h | 0.85 |
| Low-confidence topic for current project | 0.7 |
| Cross-project capability opportunity | 0.5 |
| Recency | Weight |
| Today | 1.0 |
| This week | 0.8 |
| This month | 0.5 |
| Older | 0.2 |
| Relevance | Weight |
| Current project | 1.0 |
| Any active project | 0.5 |
| Universal | 0.3 |
| Suppression (spaced repetition) | Weight |
| Surfaced last session | 0.8 |
| 2 sessions ago | 0.4 |
| 3+ sessions ago | 0.0 |
The point of suppression is to avoid repeating the same warning every session.
Output format
Generate a synthesized narrative. Do not dump raw file contents.
## Session briefing — YYYY-MM-DD
### Project: <name>
<one-line summary from project-intel: what it is, tech stack, current state>
### Mistakes to avoid
- <trigger> → <prevention rule> (from: <evidence>)
### Since last session
- <decision/change>: <what> because <why>
### Expiring soon
- <deferred action> due <date>: <description>
- Flag OVERDUE items prominently
### Confidence gaps
- <topic>: <what's uncertain and how to verify>
### Cross-project opportunities
- <project A> could use <capability> from <project B>
### Context
- <top 3 relevant session topic summaries>Return at most 10 items total across all sections. Omit empty sections. Always include the project-intel one-liner — that is how the briefing proves it knows the project.
Documentation discovery (when project-intel is missing)
If .claude/project-intel.md doesn't exist:
- Glob
docs/**/*.mdandcontent/**/*.md. - Read
CLAUDE.mdfor conventions. - Check
docs/feedback/,docs/content-review/,docs/plans/. - Check
.claude/skills/to learn what the project can do. - Flag the user: "This project is missing project-intel.md — consider creating one."
Known gotchas
- Dumping raw file contents instead of synthesizing. The whole point of /brief is to pre-digest the project state. If the output looks like cat'd files, the skill failed.
- Forgetting suppression. Without the spaced-repetition step, every session shows the same three warnings. Users tune the briefing out fast.
- Loading too much. Capping at 10 items keeps the briefing scannable. Anything longer competes with the actual task for attention.
Anti-patterns
- Generating a briefing without first checking that the project files exist. An empty briefing is more useful than a hallucinated one — flag the missing files.
- Treating every project the same. The Tier-2 file names are conventions; not every project has them. Skip what's missing instead of inventing it.
Validated patterns
- Briefings under 200 words get read. Briefings over 500 words get skimmed.
- The "since last session" section is the most-used part. Spend extra care making the diff accurate.
Self-improvement
This skill ships with a lightweight feedback loop. Adopt or ignore — the skill works without it.
Trigger a review when:
- The user explicitly corrects a briefing item (strongest signal — log immediately; 2–3 corrections on the same theme → promote to body).
- A golden case that previously passed starts failing.
- A novel input category recurs across sessions.
learnings.mdcrosses ~100 bullets (consolidation time).- The skill mis-triggers or fails to trigger.
- The Claude model version changes.
Consolidation pass (5–10 min, weekly or threshold-driven):
- Each entry gets one fate: apply, capture, or dismiss.
- Apply = merge into Known gotchas / Anti-patterns / Validated patterns.
- Capture = leave in
learnings.mdfor now. - Dismiss = delete.
- Bump
last-consolidated:in frontmatter.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

