go
Skill20 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Go phase. Reads the approved SPEC file, maps Requirements to tasks (plan), executes via TDD (build), and integrates results verifying all Acceptance Criteria.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- benchmarkSkill
- agent-introspectionSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- contextSkill
- councilSkill
- _criticSkill
- debugSkill
- discoverSkill
- _dispatchSkill
- documentSkill
- evalSkill
- evolveSkill
- orbitSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- perfSkill
- reflectSkill
- secureSkill
- shipSkill
- simplifySkill
- specSkill
- tddSkill
- teamSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- triageSkill
- verifySkill
- vuln-scanSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
CRITICAL: Run HARNESS_DIR=$(epic-harness path) first.
- Very specific: line 30
Read the file. Confirm frontmatter has status: approved.
- Distinctive: line 45
Don't plan more than 8 tasks — if bigger, split into phases
- Distinctive: line 76
Read the task description carefully
- Distinctive: line 78
Red: Write the test(s) — confirm they fail
- Distinctive: line 79
Green: Write the minimum code to pass
- Distinctive: line 81
Run tests — confirm they pass
- Distinctive: line 105
If stuck 3+ times → invoke agent-introspection skill.
- Distinctive: line 122
After all tasks complete:
- Distinctive: line 127
Run the full test suite
- Distinctive: line 128
Verify each Acceptance Criterion (AC1, AC2, ...) is demonstrably met
- Distinctive: line 129
If anything fails, dispatch a fix and re-verify
- Distinctive: line 149
tdd: Every subagent follows red-green-refactor
- Distinctive: line 151
verify: Before marking any task complete
- Distinctive: line 152
simplify: If any file exceeds 200 lines
- Distinctive: line 176
Not verifying the full suite after integration
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Go — Build It
CRITICAL: Run HARNESS_DIR=$(epic-harness path) first. NEVER use .harness/ in the project directory.
Execution Modes
This skill has 3 internal modes that run sequentially:
- go:plan — Decompose requirements into ordered, parallelizable tasks
- go:build — Execute each task using TDD (Red→Green→Refactor)
- go:integrate — Merge results, verify all ACs, fix failures
Mode: go:plan (Plan)
Decompose the spec into an execution plan.
Process
- Load the spec:
Read the file. Confirm frontmatter hasls -t $HARNESS_DIR/specs/SPEC-*.md | head -1status: approved. If not, invoke the spec skill first. - Survey the codebase: Identify relevant files, modules, patterns for each requirement.
Decompose: Map each Requirement → one or more Tasks. Every task must reference its source requirement:
Task 1: [description] — satisfies: R1 — depends on: none — modifies: [file list] Task 2: [description] — satisfies: R2 — depends on: Task 1 — modifies: [file list] Task 3: [description] — satisfies: R1,R2 (integration) — depends on: Task 1,2 — modifies: [file list]- Conflict analysis:
- Tasks modifying same files → serialize or use worktree isolation
- Tasks modifying different files → safe to parallelize
- Don't plan more than 8 tasks — if bigger, split into phases
- Include "verify integration" as final task if 3+ tasks
- Show the plan. Get user confirmation (or auto-proceed if in
/orbit). - Identify risks: For each task, list potential failure modes:
### Risks - {risk}: {mitigation} - Create feature branch (standalone invocation only —
/orbithandles this in Step 3):git checkout -b feature/{goal_slug}
Execution Order Format
- Batch 1 (parallel): Task 1, Task 3
- Batch 2 (sequential): Task 2Mode: go:build (Execute TDD)
For each task, follow this TDD cycle:
Builder Protocol
- Read the task description carefully
- Identify what file(s) to create or modify
- Red: Write the test(s) — confirm they fail
- Green: Write the minimum code to pass
- Refactor: Clean up if needed — no behavior changes
- Run tests — confirm they pass
- Report: what was built, what tests pass
Parallel Execution
Launch sub-agents with these rules:
run_in_background: truefor independent tasks (parallel execution)isolation: "worktree"if and only if parallel tasks modify overlapping files
| Scenario | Parallel? | Same Files? | Isolation? |
| Task A, B sequential | No | Any | No |
| Task A, B parallel | Yes | No overlap | No |
| Task A, B parallel | Yes | Overlap exists | Yes |
Subagent Result States
| State | Meaning | Follow-up |
| DONE | Task completed, all tests pass | Proceed |
| DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | Completed but has warnings | Review. Escalate security/data/breaking issues. |
| NEEDS_CONTEXT | Cannot proceed without user input | Prompt user with specific questions |
| BLOCKED | Unresolvable error | Try one alternative. If still blocked, report. |
If stuck 3+ times → invoke agent-introspection skill.
Subagent Output Format
## Status: [DONE|DONE_WITH_CONCERNS|NEEDS_CONTEXT|BLOCKED]
## Summary: [1-2 sentences]
## Evidence: [test output, file changes]
## Concerns: [only for DONE_WITH_CONCERNS]
## Questions: [only for NEEDS_CONTEXT]
## Blocker: [only for BLOCKED]Mode: go:integrate (Integrate)
After all tasks complete:
- Categorize each task result by state (DONE/CONCERNS/NEEDS_CONTEXT/BLOCKED)
- Resolve NEEDS_CONTEXT tasks before integration
- Attempt alternatives for BLOCKED tasks, exclude from "satisfied" count
- Run the full test suite
- Verify each Acceptance Criterion (AC1, AC2, ...) is demonstrably met
- If anything fails, dispatch a fix and re-verify
- Append to the spec file's
## Implementation Notes: decisions the spec left open and how they were made, files touched outside the plan, surprises (a test that lied, a dependency that behaved differently). Append only; never edit the sections above it. This is the record/auditand the next session read instead of re-deriving.
Go Report
## Go Report
- Spec: SPEC-{timestamp} ({goal_slug})
- Branch: {branch}
- Requirements satisfied: R1 ✅, R2 ✅, ...
- AC verified: AC1 ✅, AC2 ✅, ...
- Tests: X/Y passing
- Subagent states: X DONE, Y CONCERNS, Z BLOCKED
- Remaining issues: none / [list]Tell the user: "Build complete. Run /audit to verify before shipping."
Skills Auto-Triggered
- tdd: Every subagent follows red-green-refactor
- debug: On any test failure or error
- verify: Before marking any task complete
- simplify: If any file exceeds 200 lines
Anti-Rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead |
| "I'll just implement it all in one go" | No plan = no accountability | Plan tasks, map to requirements |
| "Tests slow me down" | Debugging takes longer than testing | Write test first, always |
| "I'll skip the plan, it's obvious" | "Obvious" hides assumptions | Plan even for simple changes |
| "I can modify files outside my task" | Scope creep introduces bugs | Stay within task boundaries |
Evidence Required
- Plan exists with tasks mapped to Requirements
- Spec's
## Implementation Notesappended (or an explicit- noneline if nothing was learned) - Each task has test(s) that pass
- All Acceptance Criteria verified
- Full test suite passes
- No uncommitted changes in worktree
Red Flags
- Implementing without a plan
- Skipping tests "to save time"
- Not verifying the full suite after integration
- Implementing everything in a single file
- Starting without a
status: approvedspec
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

