agent-introspection
Skill20 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Loop-breaking self-diagnosis. Use when 3+ consecutive failures occur, circular retries persist, or context overwhelms the session.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- qwwiwi/agentos-skills-publictheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- qwwiwi/agentos-skills-public★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- benchmarkSkill
- auditSkill
- commitSkill
- contextSkill
- councilSkill
- _criticSkill
- debugSkill
- discoverSkill
- _dispatchSkill
- documentSkill
- evalSkill
- evolveSkill
- goSkill
- orbitSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- perfSkill
- reflectSkill
- secureSkill
- shipSkill
- simplifySkill
- specSkill
- tddSkill
- teamSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- triageSkill
- verifySkill
- vuln-scanSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
NO UNSUPPORTED SELF-HEALING CLAIMS.
- Distinctive: line 21
Stop immediately and record:
- Distinctive: line 85
Not recording the failure pattern in memory
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Introspection — Systematic Self-Diagnosis
Iron Law
NO UNSUPPORTED SELF-HEALING CLAIMS. Only assert recovery actions you can actually perform with available tools.
When to Trigger
- 3+ consecutive failures on the same task
- Repeating the same approach with different parameters (loop detection)
- Context window exceeds 70% without resolution
- Error messages repeat with no progress
- User explicitly says "you're stuck" or "try a different approach"
Process
1. Failure Capture
Stop immediately and record:
- Error type: syntax_error / type_error / test_fail / lint_fail / build_fail / runtime_error / permission_denied / not_found
- Last 3 tool calls: what was attempted and what failed
- Context pressure: approximate context usage percentage
- What changed: what was the last successful state
2. Root Cause Diagnosis
Match against known patterns:
| Pattern | Symptoms | Root Cause |
| Loop trap | Same error 3+ times | Wrong approach, not wrong parameters |
| Context overflow | Increasingly confused responses | Too much information, need compaction |
| Environment drift | "Works locally" failures | Missing env var, different tool version |
| Cascade failure | Fix A breaks B | Underlying assumption is wrong |
| Tool mismatch | Wrong tool for the job | Need a different approach entirely |
3. Controlled Recovery
Execute ONLY the smallest safe action:
- Loop trap → Abandon current approach entirely. Try a fundamentally different strategy.
- Context overflow → Run
/compactor summarize current state, then continue. - Environment drift → Verify environment with explicit checks (
which,--version). - Cascade failure → Revert to last known good state. Re-analyze assumptions.
- Tool mismatch → Switch tools. If
Editfails 3 times, tryWrite. IfBashfails, tryReadfirst.
4. Introspection Report
Generate a structured report:
## Introspection Report
- **Failure type**: [type]
- **Root cause**: [diagnosis]
- **Recovery action**: [what was done]
- **Confidence**: [high/medium/low]
- **Next step**: [what to do if this happens again]Save to memory:
epic mem add \
--title "Self-diagnosis: {error_type} in {file}" \
--type error \
--body "Pattern: ...\nRoot cause: ...\nRecovery: ...\n"Anti-Rationalization
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead |
| "One more try might work" | 3 failures means the approach is wrong, not unlucky. | Stop and run the full 4-step introspection process. |
| "I just need to tweak the parameters" | Tweaking a failing approach is not debugging. Step back and reassess. | Abandon the current approach and try a fundamentally different strategy. |
| "I can fix this myself" | Asking for help is not weakness. Escalation saves everyone time. | Escalate to the user with a clear summary of what was tried and what failed. |
| "The error is clear, I know the fix" | You said that 3 times already. Prove it with a different approach. | Run the introspection report and verify the fix with a test before claiming success. |
Evidence Required
- Failure type classified correctly
- Root cause matched to known pattern
- Recovery action is the smallest safe action
- Introspection report generated
- Failure pattern recorded in memory
Red Flags
- Trying the same command more than 3 times with minor variations
- Claiming "fixed!" without running the actual test
- Not recording the failure pattern in memory
- Continuing after 70% context usage without compacting
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

