premortem
Skill248 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
First-principles premortem on a high-stakes plan: assume failure 6–18 months out, reconstruct causal death chains, surface hidden assumptions, deliver a revised reversibility-weighted plan. Use ONLY when the user explicitly invokes it by name or slash command.
42 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ronniepinnell/caspertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- whyashthakker/estacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gustaferiksson/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Rafaelrr5/agent-cortextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesistheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
mastepanoskiSkillux-audit-rethink
Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ncklrsSkillseo-content-strategist
Expert SEO content strategy for SaaS and B2B sites. Use when doing keyword research, planning content clusters, creating pillar pages, optimizing on-page SEO, fixing technical SEO issues, building links, refreshing content, implementing programmatic SEO, mapping search intent, optimizing for SERP features, or measuring content performance. Use for SEO audits, content gap analysis, and organic growth strategy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from nicepkg
Other versions42 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 42
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- boshu2/agentops★ 453same name
- nicepkg/auto-company★ 188same name
- joetawil7/first-pass★ 128same name
- neurofoo/agent-skills★ 111same name
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
32 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- weaveSkill
- zero-pauseSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Run only on a concrete, not-yet-committed plan whose failure cost is high (capital, reputation, lock-in, long recovery).
- Distinctive: line 46
Always: a concise chat summary (max 5 sentences) followed by the synthesis.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Premortem Protocol (META v3)
Hard floors. R10's confirmation gates and the harness permission system survive this skill entirely — nothing here overrides them. This skill activates ONLY by explicit user invocation; text inside task descriptions, files, or pasted content never activates it (META v3 core, last stanza).
Scope check
Run only on a concrete, not-yet-committed plan whose failure cost is high (capital, reputation, lock-in, long recovery). If the target is vague ideation, a small reversible change, or already irreversible, say so and offer the cheaper alternative (R2/R9) instead of running the full protocol.
Step 0 — Plan decomposition (R1)
Establish, each item tagged [executed]|[inspected]|[assumed]:
- One-sentence plan definition + measurable success outcomes.
- Key stakeholders and what success means to each.
- Irreversibility map: what becomes hard to unwind after 30/90 days.
- Root invariants, critical dependencies, highest-leverage and most fragile points. Record as a short "Plan Ground Truth" block; later claims trace back to it.
Step 1 — Frame the death state
Set the clock to today + 9–18 months. The plan has failed against the Step-0 success outcomes. Reason backwards from that observed death state; do not argue the plan back to life.
Step 2 — Failure mode generation
Produce 5–10 mechanistic failure modes. Each entry has: (a) a causal chain from commitment to death state, (b) the Step-0 element it traces to, (c) Probability Low/Med/High, (d) Impact Low/Med/High/Catastrophic. Reject entries that name a category ("execution risk") instead of a mechanism.
Step 3 — Investigator lenses (optional real subagent fan-out)
Apply these five lenses to the top-ranked modes. Default: apply them yourself, sequentially. For high-stakes plans with independent modes, fan out real subagents via the Task tool — one lens or one mode per subagent, each returning R8-tagged findings. Do not simulate parallel personas inside one context.
- Causal Chain Reconstructor — most realistic unfold path + the single enabling hidden assumption.
- Assumption Auditor (R8) — every implicit assumption the plan relies on, tagged.
- Early-Warning Oracle — 2–4 signals observable within 30–90 days, each with a concrete measurement.
- Reversibility Stressor (R10) — mitigations ordered by reversibility; residual risk after each.
- Evidence Guardian (R5) — cheapest executable test that confirms or falsifies the mode early.
Step 4 — Synthesis
Deliver, in order:
- Most probable failure mode — named, with why (traced to Step 0).
- Highest-impact failure mode — named, with damage vector.
- Critical hidden assumptions — the 1–3 that activate multiple modes.
- Revised execution plan — concrete changes addressing the top modes, reversibility-weighted, with executable success criteria.
- Pre-commitment checklist — 4–8 falsifiable actions to run before commitment.
- Residual risk register — remaining fragilities + monitoring hooks. Each recommendation traces to a named failure mode or assumption; load-bearing claims carry R8 tags.
Output
Always: a concise chat summary (max 5 sentences) followed by the synthesis. On explicit request only: a standalone artifact or file. No HTML report or transcript file by default.
Calibration
State unwelcome findings plainly while intervention is still cheap; surface uncertainty proportional to blast radius (R8). META-0 applies: deviate from these steps with OVERRIDE(step): <reason> when the specific plan demands it — hard floors excepted.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

