write-issue
Skill2 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a rough idea into a well-structured GitLab issue with clear problem statement, root cause, and testable acceptance criteria
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- adhamhaithameid/write-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- saroj990/dockAItheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- bbvch-ai/aihub-coretheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- gigio1023/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- gigio1023/gigio-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- yamcodes/arkenvtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- tldraw/tldraw★ 51ksame name
- Agenta-AI/agenta★ 4.9ksame name
- yamcodes/arkenv★ 151same name
- bbvch-ai/aihub-core★ 16same name
- saroj990/dockAI★ 4same name
- gigio1023/agent-skills★ 2same name
- gigio1023/gigio-skills★ 2same name
- adhamhaithameid/write-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/analyze-issue.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/create-mr.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/eng-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/fix-issue.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/gitlab-config.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/pm-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/review-code.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/summarize-issue.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/triage-issue.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/write-issue.mdcCursor rule
- analyze-issueSkill
- create-mrSkill
- eng-workflowSkill
- fix-issueSkill
- gitlab-configSkill
- pm-workflowSkill
- review-codeSkill
- summarize-issueSkill
- triage-issueSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use when you have a rough idea, bug report, or feature request that needs to become a trackable GitLab issue.
- Distinctive: line 20
Before writing anything, ask:
- Distinctive: line 26
Don't start drafting until you can answer these.
- Distinctive: line 62
If not — improve the issue before creating it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Write Issue
Use when you have a rough idea, bug report, or feature request that needs to become a trackable GitLab issue.
Steps
1. Nail the problem first
Before writing anything, ask:
- What is actually broken or missing? (the symptom)
- Why does it happen? (the root cause — for bugs)
- Who is affected and how often?
- What does "fixed" look like?
Don't start drafting until you can answer these. A vague issue creates vague work.
2. Draft the issue
Title: Short, imperative, problem-focused.
- Bug:
Users cannot log in when email contains uppercase letters - Feature:
Add CSV export to the reports page - No
[Type]prefix — use labels for that.
Description:
## Problem
What is broken or missing? What is the root cause (for bugs)?
Be specific — include error messages, affected users, frequency.
## Expected behavior
What should happen instead?
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] <specific, testable outcome — not "it works">
- [ ] <regression test covers this case>
- [ ] <no related behavior is broken>
## Out of scope
What this issue does NOT cover. Prevents scope creep.Labels: bug / feature / improvement + area (backend, frontend, design)
3. Sanity check before submitting
Ask yourself:
- Could an engineer start working on this without asking you any questions?
- Are the acceptance criteria specific enough to verify with a test?
- Is the root cause identified (for bugs) or is it still a guess?
If not — improve the issue before creating it.
4. Create
# With glab
glab issue create --title "TITLE" --description "DESCRIPTION" --label "bug,backend"
# Without glab: copy the text and paste into GitLabDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

