address-github-pr-comments
Skill9 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Address review comments on the current GitHub PR
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gologo13/agent-skillsedited, first seen Feb 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- gologo13/agent-skills★ 086% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditSkill
- add-documentationSkill
- add-error-handlingSkill
- agent-risk-reviewSkill
- agent-work-receiptSkill
- automation-roi-auditSkill
- blind-spot-passSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commit-changes-mainSkill
- commit-same-branchSkill
- commitSkill
- create-pr-mainSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- decision-auditSkill
- define-agent-goalSkill
- design-agent-loopSkill
- fix-compile-errorsSkill
- fix-git-issuesSkill
- gauntlet-loopSkill
- generate-api-docsSkill
- generate-pr-descriptionSkill
- git-sync-workspaceSkill
- instruction-ablationSkill
- light-review-existing-diffsSkill
- lint-fixSkill
- lint-suiteSkill
- merge-open-prsSkill
- optimize-performanceSkill
- pathfinderSkill
- prompt-eval-debugSkill
- refactor-codeSkill
- requirement-to-implementationSkill
- run-all-tests-and-fixSkill
- scoped-auditSkill
- security-auditSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- setup-new-featureSkill
- structure-promptSkill
- tddSkill
- thermo-nuclear-code-quality-reviewSkill
- update-memory-bankSkill
- update-readmeSkill
- write-unit-testsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 23
Run relevant tests or linters after impactful changes
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not dismiss valid security feedback.
- Distinctive: line 43
Do not commit, push, merge, or run production scripts without consent.
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not print, log, or commit secrets or credentials.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Overview
Process outstanding reviewer feedback, apply required fixes, and draft clear responses for each GitHub pull-request comment.
Steps
- Sync and audit comments
- Pull the latest branch changes
- Open the PR conversation view and read every unresolved comment
- Group comments by affected files or themes
- Plan resolutions
- List the requested code edits for each thread
- Identify clarifications or additional context you must provide
- Note any dependencies or blockers before implementing changes
- Implement fixes
- Apply targeted updates addressing one comment thread at a time
- Run relevant tests or linters after impactful changes
- Stage changes with commits that reference the addressed feedback
- Draft responses
- Summarize the action taken or reasoning provided for each comment
- Link to commits or lines when clarification helps reviewers verify
- Highlight any remaining questions or follow-up needs
Response Checklist
- All reviewer comments acknowledged
- Required code changes implemented and tested
- Clarifying explanations prepared for nuanced threads
- Follow-up items documented or escalated
- PR status updated for reviewers
Guardrails
- Push only when the user asks; do not push review fixes unrequested.
- Do not dismiss valid security feedback; address it or justify with evidence first.
- Address one comment thread at a time and run tests after impactful changes.
- Do not commit, push, merge, or run production scripts without consent; wait for an explicit request before any destructive git action.
- Do not print, log, or commit secrets or credentials; flag any exposed secret instead of including it in a commit or comment.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

