release-roadmap-hygiene
Skill4 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Trigger: release hygiene, post-release issues, Kanban status, project column, merged to main. Keep GitHub issues and Project status aligned after merges and releases.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- brand-contextSkill
- content-ledgerSkill
- discord-approval-gateSkill
- discord-general-advisorSkill
- linkedin-weekly-plannerSkill
- on-demand-brief-plannerSkill
- openclaw-runtime-orchestratorSkill
- scoped-skill-resolverSkill
- strategy-plannerSkill
- x-queue-plannerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when closing shipped issues, moving GitHub Project/Kanban items, finishing a PR merge, promoting a release branch to main, …
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not use it for issue creation, PR authoring, or implementation planning unless project status must also be changed.
- Distinctive: line 23
Never claim live/private Discord, Engram, production, or public readiness unless the issue evidence explicitly proves it.
- Very specific: line 39
Update Project status using exact columns: Merged to develop, Merged to main, or Done only when justified.
- Distinctive: line 40
Add a concise comment when closing or deferring an issue, naming any no-overclaim boundary.
- Distinctive: line 42
Verify the final issue list and Project status after edits.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Activation Contract
Use this skill when closing shipped issues, moving GitHub Project/Kanban items, finishing a PR merge, promoting a release branch to main, or cleaning up a milestone after release.
Do not use it for issue creation, PR authoring, or implementation planning unless project status must also be changed.
Hard Rules
- Preserve release truth: project status must reflect where the work actually landed.
- PR merged to
developmeansMerged to develop, notDone. - Release promoted to
mainmeans the release issue and every included shipped issue move toMerged to main. Doneis only for non-merge administrative closure or work that intentionally has no branch/main promotion semantics.- Deferred issues remain open, keep their blocker/status labels, and move to the next milestone instead of being marked merged.
- Never claim live/private Discord, Engram, production, or public readiness unless the issue evidence explicitly proves it.
Decision Gates
| Situation | Action |
PR merged into develop | Close linked issue if appropriate and set Project status to Merged to develop. |
Release PR/promote to main completed | Set the release issue and included shipped issues to Merged to main. |
| Issue shipped only partially | Close only the shipped scope with an explicit no-overclaim comment, or keep open if acceptance remains central. |
| Issue deferred to next release | Move milestone, keep open/blocked, and comment the deferred gate. |
| Milestone still has open issues | Move/close each issue explicitly before closing the milestone. |
Execution Steps
- List milestone issues and Project statuses before making changes.
- Identify shipped, deferred, and administrative issues separately.
- Update Project status using exact columns:
Merged to develop,Merged to main, orDoneonly when justified. - Add a concise comment when closing or deferring an issue, naming any no-overclaim boundary.
- Close the milestone only after open issues are zero or explicitly moved out.
- Verify the final issue list and Project status after edits.
Output Contract
Return:
- Issues moved by number and final Project status.
- Issues closed, deferred, or left open.
- Milestone state after cleanup.
- Any no-overclaim caveats or remaining release risks.
References
.atl/skill-registry.md— generated skill index used by delegators.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

