quick
Skill2 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Small fix or change without milestones or packs: one quick task (Q<nn>) through the same evidence loop, with approved lessons loaded, a failing test first, every check and a journal, then stop. Use when the user says "quick fix", "small change", "just fix X", or invokes /dragonhoard:quick "<what>". Hands off to /dragonhoard:shape when the change turns out bigger.
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fab-codes/agent-workflow-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AlleyBo55/no-overthinktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- notque/vexjoy-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- buildomator/buildomatortheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- joetawil7/first-passtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- 0kim0bos/yamtheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use plant-seed, discuss and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
notqueSkillplant-seed
Capture forward-looking idea as a seed for future feature design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
markmdevSkilldiscuss
Discuss a problem with other AI agents before implementing. Spawns one or more autonomous claude -p conversations with different perspectives (architect, critic, domain expert), runs multi-round discussions, and synthesizes findings. Use when facing design decisions, architecture tradeoffs, knowledge organization questions, or any problem that benefits from multiple viewpoints before committing to an approach. Also use proactively when you're uncertain about a direction.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 6 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- notque/claude-code-toolkit★ 448same name
- notque/vexjoy-agent★ 448same name
- govctl-org/govctl★ 276same name
- joetawil7/first-pass★ 128same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
- rizukirr/vibekit★ 20same name
- jamillazarev/multica-ops★ 11same name
- codebycorey/delta-spec★ 4same name
- Yafan-Yang/ai-trading★ 4same name
- AlleyBo55/no-overthink★ 3same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
Read <root>/LESSONS.md and apply every approved lesson that fits.
- Distinctive: line 42
Run every standard check and record the counts.
- Distinctive: line 44
Write the focused test first, run it, and confirm it fails for the expected reason.
- Very specific: line 56
Run the focused test, then every standard check.
- Very specific: line 70
Write a journal attempt with Outcome BLOCKED, then run dragonhoard.py log Q<nn> task.blocked "<reason.
- Very specific: line 76
If the journal shows a FAIL→PASS story or a surprising root cause, offer /dragonhoard:learn (provenance Q<nn>#<attempt>).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
dragonhoard quick
CLI: python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dragonhoard.py" (called dragonhoard.py below).
<root> is the root in dragonhoard.json; the standard checks are its checks.
Quick tasks live outside the milestones: they are not in STATUS.md or PROGRESS.md, and next
never picks them. They still leave evidence and feed lessons. In hybrid mode, quick runs in this
session and does not delegate.
0. Fit
Quick is for a change that touches about three files or fewer, needs no design choice between
options and adds no dependency. If the request is bigger, say so, suggest /dragonhoard:shape
(or /dragonhoard:explore for an open choice), and stop.
No dragonhoard.json: run /dragonhoard:init first.
1. Start
dragonhoard.py quick "<one-line title>" # prints the ID (Q<nn>) and its journal pathRead <root>/LESSONS.md and apply every approved lesson that fits. Read only the files the change
touches.
2. Plan
Restate the goal, the files and the acceptance in three lines or fewer.
3. Verify (before building)
- Run every standard check and record the counts. If one is red before your change, record BLOCKED (section 6); do not fix unrelated breakage.
- Write the focused test first, run it, and confirm it fails for the expected reason. If the change cannot be tested (docs, configuration), write that in the journal and name the check that proves it instead.
4. Build
Make the smallest change that meets the acceptance, in the files you named. If it needs more
files or a design decision appears, stop: record BLOCKED with "grew beyond quick: <why>; owner:
/dragonhoard:shape".
5. Test and record
Run the focused test, then every standard check. Append an attempt block to the journal in the
format in <root>/README.md, with the real commands and the shortest decisive output line. A
failed run is an attempt with Outcome FAIL and its root cause. Two failed bounded attempts at
the same issue means BLOCKED.
When it passes:
dragonhoard.py log Q<nn> task.done "<one line: what now works>" --ref quick/<journal file>
dragonhoard.py digest6. BLOCKED
Write a journal attempt with Outcome BLOCKED, then run
dragonhoard.py log Q<nn> task.blocked "<reason; owner action>" and dragonhoard.py digest.
7. Stop
Report what was done and the evidence. Commits are an owner action; do not commit unless asked.
If the journal shows a FAIL→PASS story or a surprising root cause, offer /dragonhoard:learn
(provenance Q<nn>#<attempt>).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

