agentleFS
edwinidrusedwinidrus/dragonhoard/skills/explore/SKILL.md

explore

Skill2 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub

Resolve an open implementation choice with evidence: cheap parallel retrieval (haiku scouts), up to 3 parallel throwaway spikes in isolated worktrees (sonnet spikers), a frontier-model comparison (opus judge), then the owner picks and the decision is logged. Use inside /dragonhoard:next when a pack lists Open options, or when the user says "explore options", "spike these", "which approach works", or invokes /dragonhoard:explore.

67 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use agent-context-isolation, agentica-infrastructure and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 58 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write down three things:

    line 19
  2. Very specific:

    Run dragonhoard.py role scout and follow what it prints, one scout per factual question.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    If only one option survives, skip to step 5 and present it, with the facts that eliminated the others.

    line 35
  4. Very specific:

    Run dragonhoard.py role spiker and follow what it prints: one spiker per surviving option, at most 3, each in its own isolated worktree.

    line 40
  5. Very specific:

    Run dragonhoard.py role judge and follow what it prints.

    line 53
  6. Very specific:

    Ask the owner and wait for the answer (in Claude Code, use AskUserQuestion with the evidence in each option's preview).

    line 61
  7. Very specific:

    Add an Explored: line to the task's journal attempt, listing each option, its verdict and its criterion output.

    line 72

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 58 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

dragonhoard explore

CLI: python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dragonhoard.py" (called dragonhoard.py below). Input: $ARGUMENTS. That is the open choice, or empty (then take it from the current pack's Open options).

1. Frame the choice

Write down three things:

  • the question;
  • 2 or 3 candidate options;
  • one success criterion per option, as a command whose output decides pass or fail.

You may also add a cost ceiling, such as "no new runtime dependency". Check <root>/DIGEST.md first: if an option.chosen event already answers this question, stop and cite it.

2. Retrieve (cheap, parallel)

Run dragonhoard.py role scout and follow what it prints, one scout per factual question. Where the host has scout subagents, launch them together so they run in parallel. Typical questions: does the library support X in our version; how the codebase already does Y; what an API returns. Drop options the facts rule out.

If only one option survives, skip to step 5 and present it, with the facts that eliminated the others.

3. Spike (parallel, isolated, bounded)

Run dragonhoard.py role spiker and follow what it prints: one spiker per surviving option, at most 3, each in its own isolated worktree. They run in parallel where the host has spiker subagents, and one at a time inline otherwise. Give each spiker:

  • the option;
  • its success criterion command;
  • the files it may touch;
  • a timebox of about 15 tool calls;
  • the relevant pack excerpt.

Spikes are evidence, not delivery. Their code is never merged.

4. Judge

Run dragonhoard.py role judge and follow what it prints. If it says PAUSE, do exactly what it says: ask the owner to switch models before judging, or (external judge) stop and hand the judge request to the orchestrator. Give the judge the question, the criteria and every spiker report. It verifies the reports, then returns a comparison table, a recommendation and warnings.

5. Owner picks

Ask the owner and wait for the answer (in Claude Code, use AskUserQuestion with the evidence in each option's preview). Put the judge's recommendation first, labelled "(Recommended)". For each option, give its verdict, its criterion result and its cost. The owner may also answer "none — rethink".

6. Record

dragonhoard.py log <task> option.chosen "<question>: <choice> — <decisive evidence>" --ref tasks/<task>.journal.md

Add an Explored: line to the task's journal attempt, listing each option, its verdict and its criterion output.

List the spike worktrees that still exist (git worktree list). Ask the owner before removing them; do not delete them yourself.

Return to the Verify step of /dragonhoard:next. Build the chosen option properly there, test first, inside the pack's file list. Do not copy the spike.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.