explore
Skill2 starsChanged 9 days agoMITView on GitHub
Resolve an open implementation choice with evidence: cheap parallel retrieval (haiku scouts), up to 3 parallel throwaway spikes in isolated worktrees (sonnet spikers), a frontier-model comparison (opus judge), then the owner picks and the decision is logged. Use inside /dragonhoard:next when a pack lists Open options, or when the user says "explore options", "spike these", "which approach works", or invokes /dragonhoard:explore.
67 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jskswamy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NemesLaszlo/claude-code-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yuri-xyz/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- matthewwong525/WongStacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lumpcode/lumpcodetheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- renzrollon/interlocktheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use agent-context-isolation, agentica-infrastructure and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagentica-infrastructure
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from parcadei
Other versions67 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 67
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- JordanCoin/codemap★ 710same name
- ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 585same name
- strands-agents/box★ 503same name
- andreasmolnardev/dashwise-next★ 465same name
- ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst★ 304same name
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudios★ 118same name
- exmergo/dex★ 116same name
57 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 58 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Write down three things:
- Very specific: line 30
Run dragonhoard.py role scout and follow what it prints, one scout per factual question.
- Distinctive: line 35
If only one option survives, skip to step 5 and present it, with the facts that eliminated the others.
- Very specific: line 40
Run dragonhoard.py role spiker and follow what it prints: one spiker per surviving option, at most 3, each in its own isolated worktree.
- Very specific: line 53
Run dragonhoard.py role judge and follow what it prints.
- Very specific: line 61
Ask the owner and wait for the answer (in Claude Code, use AskUserQuestion with the evidence in each option's preview).
- Very specific: line 72
Add an Explored: line to the task's journal attempt, listing each option, its verdict and its criterion output.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 58 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
dragonhoard explore
CLI: python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/dragonhoard.py" (called dragonhoard.py below).
Input: $ARGUMENTS. That is the open choice, or empty (then take it from the current pack's Open
options).
1. Frame the choice
Write down three things:
- the question;
- 2 or 3 candidate options;
- one success criterion per option, as a command whose output decides pass or fail.
You may also add a cost ceiling, such as "no new runtime dependency". Check
<root>/DIGEST.md first: if an option.chosen event already answers this question, stop and
cite it.
2. Retrieve (cheap, parallel)
Run dragonhoard.py role scout and follow what it prints, one scout per factual question. Where
the host has scout subagents, launch them together so they run in parallel. Typical questions:
does the library support X in our version; how the codebase already does Y; what an API returns.
Drop options the facts rule out.
If only one option survives, skip to step 5 and present it, with the facts that eliminated the others.
3. Spike (parallel, isolated, bounded)
Run dragonhoard.py role spiker and follow what it prints: one spiker per surviving option, at most
3, each in its own isolated worktree. They run in parallel where the host has spiker subagents,
and one at a time inline otherwise. Give each spiker:
- the option;
- its success criterion command;
- the files it may touch;
- a timebox of about 15 tool calls;
- the relevant pack excerpt.
Spikes are evidence, not delivery. Their code is never merged.
4. Judge
Run dragonhoard.py role judge and follow what it prints. If it says PAUSE, do exactly what it
says: ask the owner to switch models before judging, or (external judge) stop and hand the judge
request to the orchestrator. Give the judge the question, the criteria and every
spiker report. It verifies the reports, then returns a comparison table, a recommendation and
warnings.
5. Owner picks
Ask the owner and wait for the answer (in Claude Code, use AskUserQuestion with the evidence in
each option's preview). Put the judge's recommendation first, labelled "(Recommended)". For
each option, give its verdict, its criterion result and its cost. The owner may also answer
"none — rethink".
6. Record
dragonhoard.py log <task> option.chosen "<question>: <choice> — <decisive evidence>" --ref tasks/<task>.journal.mdAdd an Explored: line to the task's journal attempt, listing each option, its verdict and its
criterion output.
List the spike worktrees that still exist (git worktree list). Ask the owner before removing
them; do not delete them yourself.
Return to the Verify step of /dragonhoard:next. Build the chosen option properly there, test
first, inside the pack's file list. Do not copy the spike.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

