agentleFS
eduardo-sleduardo-sl/go-agent-skills/skills/(workflow)/go-refactoring/SKILL.md

go-refactoring

Skill85 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub

Safe refactoring workflow for Go: behavior-preserving steps, compiler-checked renames, extracting packages, breaking circular dependencies, and strangler migrations — always behind green tests. Use when: "refactor this", "rename across the codebase", "extract a package", "break this circular dependency", "split this god package", "migrate callers", "clean up without changing behavior". Not for: choosing the target architecture (go-architecture-review), adopting new language features (go-modernize), performance rewrites (go-performance-review).

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read a reference file only when the summary below is not enough.

    line 33
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop for the developer's approval before any cross-package move, exported API change, deletion, or change to code with no tests.

    line 43
  3. Very specific:

    Commit: Never mix a refactor commit with a behavior change — reviewers can skim a refactor: commit.

    line 57
  4. Distinctive:

    If step 3 fails and the fix isn't obvious in a minute, revert the step rather than debugging a half-applied transformation.

    line 62
  5. Very specific:

    After a rename, grep for the old name in struct tags, templates, SQL and anything reflection reads — gopls guards compilation, not those.

    line 77
  6. Very specific:

    Never rename an exported identifier of a published library without a deprecation cycle: add the new name, mark the old one // Deprecated: …

    line 81
  7. Very specific:

    Create the new package; move one type and its methods (gopls or cut/paste), leaving everything else.

    line 89
  8. Distinctive:

    Delete the aliases when no importer remains.

    line 94
  9. Very specific:

    Invert with an interface: if store calls back into service, define the callback interface IN store (consumer side) and let service …

    line 105
  10. Distinctive:

    Merge: if two packages can't be described without each other, they were one package all along.

    line 108
  11. Distinctive:

    Delete the old implementation in its own commit.

    line 147
  12. Very specific:

    When the same change lands at many sites, encode it once and let a tool apply it: gofmt -r for syntactic expressions, //go:fix inline + go …

    line 151
  13. Very specific:

    No new dependency cycles (go build ./...

    line 174

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Go Refactoring Workflow

A refactor changes structure, never behavior. The definition of done is mechanical: same tests pass before and after every step, and every step is small enough to revert alone.

Detailed reference material, loaded on demand:

  • references/bulk-rewrites.md — gofmt -r, //go:fix inline, eg, gopatch and custom analyzers, with the verification to run after.

Read a reference file only when the summary below is not enough.

0. Risk, Checkpoints, and When Not To

RiskTransformationsBefore you start
Lowgopls rename, extract/inline variable, organize importsGreen build and tests
MediumExtract function or method, inline a call across packages, add/remove a parameterTests that cover every changed call site
HighMove types across packages, split or merge packages, break cycles, change exported APIFull safety net, and the developer's sign-off

Stop for the developer's approval before any cross-package move, exported API change, deletion, or change to code with no tests. Question the refactor itself when the code is stable and nothing planned touches it, when it is critical and untested, or when no concrete next change gets easier.

1. The Loop

  1. Baseline: go build ./... && go test ./... must be green before touching anything. If tests are missing around the target code, write characterization tests FIRST — they pin current behavior, even if that behavior looks wrong.
  2. One transformation from the catalog below.
  3. Verify: build + tests + go vet ./....
  4. Commit. Never mix a refactor commit with a behavior change — reviewers can skim a refactor: commit; they must scrutinize a mixed one.
  5. Repeat.

If step 3 fails and the fix isn't obvious in a minute, revert the step rather than debugging a half-applied transformation.

2. Renames — Let Tools Do Them

# Preferred: gopls (understands types, interfaces, embedding)
gopls rename -w internal/service/user.go:#offset newName

# Module path or package import path changes:
# update go.mod, then rewrite imports mechanically
find . -name '*.go' -exec sed -i 's|github.com/acme/old|github.com/acme/new|g' {} +
go build ./...   # the compiler is the reviewer

After a rename, grep for the old name in struct tags, templates, SQL and anything reflection reads — gopls guards compilation, not those. Renaming a field silently desyncs it from its json/db tag.

Never rename an exported identifier of a published library without a deprecation cycle: add the new name, mark the old one // Deprecated: use NewName., delete in the next major version.

3. Extract Package

Moving code out of a god package, in compiler-checked steps:

  1. Create the new package; move one type and its methods (gopls or cut/paste), leaving everything else.
  2. In the old package, add type aliases so nothing breaks: type User = user.User (aliases, =, not definitions).
  3. Build. Migrate importers to the new path in batches; build each batch.
  4. Delete the aliases when no importer remains.

This keeps every commit green with an arbitrarily large caller base.

4. Break a Circular Dependency

Packages a → b and b → a won't compile; near-cycles show up as god packages. Three escapes, in order of preference:

  1. Extract the shared core: both a and b actually depend on a type — move it to a third package c that imports nothing.
  2. Invert with an interface: if store calls back into service, define the callback interface IN store (consumer side) and let service implement it. The arrow flips at compile time.
  3. Merge: if two packages can't be described without each other, they were one package all along.

5. Change a Function Signature Safely

For exported functions with many callers:

// Step 1 — add the new form alongside the old
func (s *Service) ProcessCtx(ctx context.Context, id string) error { ... }

// Step 2 — old form delegates; mark deprecated
// Deprecated: use ProcessCtx.
func (s *Service) Process(id string) error {
    return s.ProcessCtx(context.Background(), id)
}

// Step 3 — migrate callers batch by batch, building each batch
// Step 4 — delete the old form (same module) or keep until next major (library)

On Go 1.26+, add //go:fix inline above the deprecated wrapper and step 3 becomes go fix ./... — for your module now, and for every downstream module when it next runs go fix.

Inside a single module, prefer atomic signature changes when the compiler can find every caller for you: change it, then chase the build errors — that's the compiler enumerating your TODO list.

6. Strangler Migration for Subsystems

Replacing a subsystem (old store, legacy client) too big for one PR:

  1. Define the consumer-side interface the callers actually need.
  2. Make the OLD implementation satisfy it; wire callers to the interface.
  3. Build the new implementation behind the same interface; test both implementations against one shared conformance test suite.
  4. Switch the wiring in the composition root (one line, one commit, trivially revertible). Feature-flag it if risk warrants.
  5. Delete the old implementation in its own commit.

7. Bulk Mechanical Rewrites

When the same change lands at many sites, encode it once and let a tool apply it: gofmt -r for syntactic expressions, //go:fix inline + go fix for callers of your own APIs, eg for type-aware expression rewrites, gopatch for statements and imports, a go/analysis fixer for migrations you will run again. A tool's rewrite is reviewable and re-runnable; forty hand edits are neither. Examples: references/bulk-rewrites.md.

8. What Is NOT a Refactor

  • "While I'm here" bug fixes — separate commit before or after.
  • Reordering struct fields used with positional literals, changing exported error strings callers match on, changing JSON tags — these are behavior changes wearing refactor clothes.
  • Rewrites without tests. If you can't pin behavior first, you're not refactoring; you're gambling.

Verification Checklist

  1. Baseline build + tests green before the first change
  2. Characterization tests added where coverage was missing
  3. Each commit is one transformation; refactor: commits contain no behavior change
  4. Renames done via gopls/compiler, not find-and-replace on identifiers
  5. Package extractions used type aliases to stay green mid-flight
  6. No new dependency cycles (go build ./... proves it)
  7. Public API changes follow the deprecation cycle
  8. go vet ./... and the full test suite pass at every commit, not just the last
  9. git log reads as a sequence of safe, revertible steps
  10. High-risk steps approved by the developer before they start
  11. Struct tags, templates and SQL grepped after every rename

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.