ketchup
Skill1 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Catch the user up on changes in the current chat and every decision or action still waiting on them. Manual invocation only; use when the user explicitly invokes ketchup or requests this catch-up workflow. Read-only; distinguish verified state from reports and unknowns.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Run only after an explicit request.
- Distinctive: line 16
Keep this turn read-only. Use the current conversation, work already performed, available agent reports, and existing artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 40
Keep the progress story short and spend words on the decisions.
- Distinctive: line 52
Use existing captured screenshots and videos.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ketchup
Catch the user up on what changed since their last message before this invocation. Assume they remember that message and nothing after it. Then explain every outstanding call they own well enough to decide from this reply alone.
Run only after an explicit request. Notifications, tool output, and agent reports are not user messages. If the baseline or earlier context is missing, state that limit rather than claiming a complete account.
Gather evidence without changing state
Keep this turn read-only. Use the current conversation, work already performed, available agent reports, and existing artifacts. Do not change files, start apps or jobs, launch agents, post messages, or take an action on the user's behalf.
Check the current state of PRs, checks, or agents this chat touched when authorized read-only access is available. Otherwise label the information as last reported or unknown. Do not search unrelated projects or old conversations, obtain new access, or imply a status check ran when it did not. Recheck numbers against their evidence and explicitly identify any correction to a previously reported number. Do not expose secrets or sensitive personal data.
Include outstanding user-owned calls even when they were raised before the catch-up baseline. A call is a decision or action only the user can take: a product choice, approval, missing access, or an irreversible step awaiting permission. Work the assistant can still do is not a user action item. Do not invent optional work to fill the list.
For every item, collect:
- its recognizable name and existing link or identifier, when needed to act;
- what it changes for the user;
- the evidence and recommendation;
- its risk, prerequisites, and any irreversible consequence;
- any decision-critical unknown.
Write the catch-up
Use plain words and short sentences, like one person catching up another. Say what changed for the user, not how the agent worked. Prefer “the tests pass” to “CI is green.” Keep paths, commands, hashes, and counts only when needed to understand or act. Use names the user recognizes.
- Open with one short sentence naming what waits on the user, or saying nothing does. If nothing changed and nothing waits, say so and stop.
- Show existing screenshots or videos inline when supported and useful. Add a small diagram only when a relationship or before-and-after is clearer as a picture.
- Summarize each requested outcome briefly: what changed and whether it is finished, running, failed, or not checked. Include relevant bugs found and fixed. Do not call something finished while it awaits the user, or repeat details covered by the action items.
- Name any remaining work the assistant can do in one short line.
- List every outstanding user-owned call with a recommendation and the evidence needed to decide.
Keep the progress story short and spend words on the decisions. Never replace a list of items with a count, hide details behind links, or drop items to meet a word limit.
Make the decisions self-contained
For one item, give the call, your pick, user impact, evidence, and risk together.
When several items share a call, state the call and recommendation once, then list each item separately, highest risk first. Give each item's name or link, impact, evidence, and risk, even when risk is low. Note a different recommendation where it applies. Mention the cost of waiting only when it is more than delay, such as a missed deadline or lost data.
For a choice between options, include every option actually weighed, what each gains and costs, and its known current state. Do not manufacture alternatives. Put prerequisites and irreversible consequences before the recommendation's action. Say “unknown” when missing evidence matters; do not turn a partial report into a confident approval.
Visuals without extra work
Use existing captured screenshots and videos; never fabricate a screen or claim a capture exists. For a visible change without a capture, say “No screenshot yet” and describe what changed. Link only artifacts that exist.
A small supported Mermaid or text diagram may explain connections, dependencies, or options using known facts. Keep labels plain and the diagram readable at a glance. Do not draw a status list, decorate action items, repeat the same facts across text and pictures, or require a renderer, image generator, or another skill. If the host cannot display a useful visual, explain the relationship briefly in words.
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- instructure/canvas-lms★ 6.9ksame name
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.3ksame name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- dsebban/skills★ 71same name
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 18same name
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 17same name
- mariusflorescu/pstack-t3★ 13same name
- adjohn/pstack★ 9same name
- alexnthnz/keel★ 5same name
- anis-dr/skills★ 3same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use ketchup-video, maintain-formal-verification-skill and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
3metaJunSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /ketchup, with a short subtitled video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /ketchup-video.
Also in 10 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillmaintain-formal-verification-skill
Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.
Also in 13 projects that use this
TheOnlyFusionCubeSkillcreate-formal-verification-skill
Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, \"model-check this race\", \"prove this invariant\", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.
Also in 15 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 10 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 17 projects that use this
Xia-AtaraxiaSkillbenchmark-checklist
Vets performance measurements for the limiter, tuning, physical limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and proof that timed work happened. It applies to 'check this benchmark', 'report this speedup', measured regressions, and choosing a library or configuration from numbers. It reports spread and gaps before drawing a conclusion. Not for general testing policy or choosing test oracles - use principle-testing.
Also in 19 projects that use this
- +1 more from TheOnlyFusionCube
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- brainstormSkill
- broSkill
- clarifySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debug-errorSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- execution-verificationSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- java-coderSkill
- owasp-securitySkill
- pdfSkill
- pretty-mermaidSkill
- refactor-codeSkill
- reflectSkill
- sharpenSkill
- skill-hunterSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- technical-writingSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- typesafe-aiSkill
- typescript-coderSkill
- unslopSkill
- write-testsSkill
- wrongSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

