agentleFS
dmzoneilldmzoneill/skills/compare-options/SKILL.md

compare-options

Skill2 starsChanged 19 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Compare multiple approaches, libraries, or patterns. Searches codebase for existing usage, checks memory for past experiences, creates comparison matrix. Use when deciding between approaches before implementation.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Compare Options

Compares options with codebase usage and memory context.

Inputs

InputTypeDefaultPurpose
questionstringrequiredDecision to make (e.g., "Which caching solution?")
optionsstringrequiredComma-separated options (e.g., "Redis, Memcached, Django cache")
criteriastring-Comma-separated criteria (default: complexity, performance, maintainability, existing usage)
projectstringautoProject context

Workflow

1. Parse Inputs

  • Split options into list
  • Split criteria or use defaults: complexity, performance, maintainability, existing usage

2. Detect Project

  • Infer from cwd; default automation-analytics-backend

3. Search Each Option in Codebase

  • For each option (up to 3): code_search(query=option, project=project, limit=5)
  • Count occurrences, collect file paths

4. Check Memory

  • memory_read("learned/patterns") — past experiences with these options

5. Analyze Results

  • Per option: usage_count, usage_files, in_codebase (yes/no)

6. Build Comparison

Output markdown with:

  • Options Overview: table (Option | In Codebase | Usage Count | Files)
  • Detailed Analysis: per option, pros/cons placeholders
  • Evaluation Matrix: criteria × options (1–5 ratings)
  • Recommendation: placeholder for recommended option and rationale
  • Next Steps: WebSearch for pros/cons, explain_code for existing usage, plan_implementation

7. Log

  • memory_session_log("Compared options: {options}", "Question: {question}")

Key MCP Tools

  • code_search — existing usage per option
  • memory_read — learned patterns
  • memory_session_log — session logging
  • WebSearch — external pros/cons (optional)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.